Cargando…
Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far?
There is now significant evidence to support an independent causal role for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations are predominantly determined by genetic factors. However, research into Lp(a) has been hampered by incomplete un...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122073 |
_version_ | 1783485495063347200 |
---|---|
author | Ward, Natalie C. Kostner, Karam M. Sullivan, David R. Nestel, Paul Watts, Gerald F. |
author_facet | Ward, Natalie C. Kostner, Karam M. Sullivan, David R. Nestel, Paul Watts, Gerald F. |
author_sort | Ward, Natalie C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is now significant evidence to support an independent causal role for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations are predominantly determined by genetic factors. However, research into Lp(a) has been hampered by incomplete understanding of its metabolism and proatherogeneic properties and by a lack of suitable animal models. Furthermore, a lack of standardized assays to measure Lp(a) and no universal consensus on optimal plasma levels remain significant obstacles. In addition, there are currently no approved specific therapies that target and lower elevated plasma Lp(a), although there are recent but limited clinical outcome data suggesting benefits of such reduction. Despite this, international guidelines now recognize elevated Lp(a) as a risk enhancing factor for risk reclassification. This review summarises the current literature on Lp(a), including its discovery and recognition as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor, attempts to standardise analytical measurement, interpopulation studies, and emerging therapies for lowering elevated Lp(a) levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69472012020-01-13 Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? Ward, Natalie C. Kostner, Karam M. Sullivan, David R. Nestel, Paul Watts, Gerald F. J Clin Med Review There is now significant evidence to support an independent causal role for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations are predominantly determined by genetic factors. However, research into Lp(a) has been hampered by incomplete understanding of its metabolism and proatherogeneic properties and by a lack of suitable animal models. Furthermore, a lack of standardized assays to measure Lp(a) and no universal consensus on optimal plasma levels remain significant obstacles. In addition, there are currently no approved specific therapies that target and lower elevated plasma Lp(a), although there are recent but limited clinical outcome data suggesting benefits of such reduction. Despite this, international guidelines now recognize elevated Lp(a) as a risk enhancing factor for risk reclassification. This review summarises the current literature on Lp(a), including its discovery and recognition as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor, attempts to standardise analytical measurement, interpopulation studies, and emerging therapies for lowering elevated Lp(a) levels. MDPI 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6947201/ /pubmed/31783529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122073 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ward, Natalie C. Kostner, Karam M. Sullivan, David R. Nestel, Paul Watts, Gerald F. Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title | Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title_full | Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title_fullStr | Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title_short | Molecular, Population, and Clinical Aspects of Lipoprotein(a): A Bridge Too Far? |
title_sort | molecular, population, and clinical aspects of lipoprotein(a): a bridge too far? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardnataliec molecularpopulationandclinicalaspectsoflipoproteinaabridgetoofar AT kostnerkaramm molecularpopulationandclinicalaspectsoflipoproteinaabridgetoofar AT sullivandavidr molecularpopulationandclinicalaspectsoflipoproteinaabridgetoofar AT nestelpaul molecularpopulationandclinicalaspectsoflipoproteinaabridgetoofar AT wattsgeraldf molecularpopulationandclinicalaspectsoflipoproteinaabridgetoofar |