Cargando…

Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients

Background: Cesarean deliveries represent a large percentage of deliveries worldwide. Patients undergoing repeat cesarean deliveries are known to have increased risks for surgical complications. However, little is known regarding potential differences in pain. We sought to compare postoperative opio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Amanda, Pasca, Ioana, Alschuler, Matthew, Lee, Jay, Woodfin, Michelle, Pugh, Justin, Austin, Briahnna, Ringer, Mark, Ramsingh, Davinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122221
_version_ 1783485550031798272
author Chao, Amanda
Pasca, Ioana
Alschuler, Matthew
Lee, Jay
Woodfin, Michelle
Pugh, Justin
Austin, Briahnna
Ringer, Mark
Ramsingh, Davinder
author_facet Chao, Amanda
Pasca, Ioana
Alschuler, Matthew
Lee, Jay
Woodfin, Michelle
Pugh, Justin
Austin, Briahnna
Ringer, Mark
Ramsingh, Davinder
author_sort Chao, Amanda
collection PubMed
description Background: Cesarean deliveries represent a large percentage of deliveries worldwide. Patients undergoing repeat cesarean deliveries are known to have increased risks for surgical complications. However, little is known regarding potential differences in pain. We sought to compare postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in opioid naïve patients undergoing primary versus repeat non-emergent cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patient inclusion criteria included: having a non-emergent cesarean delivery, receiving a spinal procedure for surgical anesthesia without general anesthesia, and following the same postoperative pain management protocols. Exclusion criteria included: history of opioid tolerance, illicit drug use, or prior, non-obstetric, major abdominal surgery. The primary outcome marker was total morphine equivalents consumed 0–72 h post-procedure compared between the primary versus repeat cesarean delivery groups. Secondary outcome markers were opioid consumption and pain scores in 24-h period increments for the first 72 h postoperatively. Results: 1617 patients were screened. 217 primary and 377 repeat cesarean deliveries met criteria for comparison. Reduced opioid consumption was demonstrated for the total opioid consumption 0–72 h for the repeat cesarean delivery group (median = 35) compared to the primary cesarean delivery group (median = 58), p = 0.0005. When divided into 24-h periods, differences were demonstrated for the 24–48 and 48–72 h periods but not the 0–24 h period. Pain scores did not differ statistically. Conclusion: Opioid naïve obstetric patients who undergo non-emergent repeat cesarean delivery demonstrate lower opioid consumption in the postoperative period. Providers should be aware of this potential difference in order to better educate patients and provide adequate pain management. Highlights: The study reviewed differences in opioid consumption between primary and repeat cesarean deliveries. All patients received the same protocol for spinal dosage and pain management. Repeat cesarean deliveries were associated with lower opioid consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69474342020-01-13 Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients Chao, Amanda Pasca, Ioana Alschuler, Matthew Lee, Jay Woodfin, Michelle Pugh, Justin Austin, Briahnna Ringer, Mark Ramsingh, Davinder J Clin Med Article Background: Cesarean deliveries represent a large percentage of deliveries worldwide. Patients undergoing repeat cesarean deliveries are known to have increased risks for surgical complications. However, little is known regarding potential differences in pain. We sought to compare postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in opioid naïve patients undergoing primary versus repeat non-emergent cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patient inclusion criteria included: having a non-emergent cesarean delivery, receiving a spinal procedure for surgical anesthesia without general anesthesia, and following the same postoperative pain management protocols. Exclusion criteria included: history of opioid tolerance, illicit drug use, or prior, non-obstetric, major abdominal surgery. The primary outcome marker was total morphine equivalents consumed 0–72 h post-procedure compared between the primary versus repeat cesarean delivery groups. Secondary outcome markers were opioid consumption and pain scores in 24-h period increments for the first 72 h postoperatively. Results: 1617 patients were screened. 217 primary and 377 repeat cesarean deliveries met criteria for comparison. Reduced opioid consumption was demonstrated for the total opioid consumption 0–72 h for the repeat cesarean delivery group (median = 35) compared to the primary cesarean delivery group (median = 58), p = 0.0005. When divided into 24-h periods, differences were demonstrated for the 24–48 and 48–72 h periods but not the 0–24 h period. Pain scores did not differ statistically. Conclusion: Opioid naïve obstetric patients who undergo non-emergent repeat cesarean delivery demonstrate lower opioid consumption in the postoperative period. Providers should be aware of this potential difference in order to better educate patients and provide adequate pain management. Highlights: The study reviewed differences in opioid consumption between primary and repeat cesarean deliveries. All patients received the same protocol for spinal dosage and pain management. Repeat cesarean deliveries were associated with lower opioid consumption. MDPI 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6947434/ /pubmed/31888170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122221 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chao, Amanda
Pasca, Ioana
Alschuler, Matthew
Lee, Jay
Woodfin, Michelle
Pugh, Justin
Austin, Briahnna
Ringer, Mark
Ramsingh, Davinder
Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title_full Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title_short Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Pain Scores in Primary Versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Opioid Naïve Patients
title_sort comparison of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in primary versus repeat cesarean delivery in opioid naïve patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31888170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122221
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoamanda comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT pascaioana comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT alschulermatthew comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT leejay comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT woodfinmichelle comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT pughjustin comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT austinbriahnna comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT ringermark comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients
AT ramsinghdavinder comparisonofpostoperativeopioidconsumptionandpainscoresinprimaryversusrepeatcesareandeliveryinopioidnaivepatients