Cargando…
Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% smal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172 |
_version_ | 1783485552387948544 |
---|---|
author | Qian, Chenhao Liang, Chen He, Ziyang Ji, Weixi |
author_facet | Qian, Chenhao Liang, Chen He, Ziyang Ji, Weixi |
author_sort | Qian, Chenhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% small spheres (S) with different structures from two layers to five layers. The impact response and energy absorption were investigated by drop-weight impact tests. Under static loading, more layers led to higher yield stress and lower energy absorption. There were three types of progressive failures of layered syntactic form under impact loading. The failure propagation was examined and found to be dependent on the layer number and impact energy. Interestingly, layered syntactic foam absorbed more energy than both of its components in terms of ductility. The ductility of layered syntactic foam decreased with the increase in layer number. The peak stress of layered syntactic foam increased with the increase in layer number. Two-layered syntactic foam LS had the highest ductility under 60 J/g impact, as well as an energy absorption of 35 J/g, compared to other layered syntactic foams. Specifically, its component L had a ductility under 70 J/g and an energy absorption of 25 J/g, while component S had a ductility under 10 J/g and an energy absorption of 10 J/g. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69474442020-01-13 Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam Qian, Chenhao Liang, Chen He, Ziyang Ji, Weixi Materials (Basel) Article This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% small spheres (S) with different structures from two layers to five layers. The impact response and energy absorption were investigated by drop-weight impact tests. Under static loading, more layers led to higher yield stress and lower energy absorption. There were three types of progressive failures of layered syntactic form under impact loading. The failure propagation was examined and found to be dependent on the layer number and impact energy. Interestingly, layered syntactic foam absorbed more energy than both of its components in terms of ductility. The ductility of layered syntactic foam decreased with the increase in layer number. The peak stress of layered syntactic foam increased with the increase in layer number. Two-layered syntactic foam LS had the highest ductility under 60 J/g impact, as well as an energy absorption of 35 J/g, compared to other layered syntactic foams. Specifically, its component L had a ductility under 70 J/g and an energy absorption of 25 J/g, while component S had a ductility under 10 J/g and an energy absorption of 10 J/g. MDPI 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6947444/ /pubmed/31842303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Qian, Chenhao Liang, Chen He, Ziyang Ji, Weixi Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title | Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title_full | Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title_fullStr | Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title_short | Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam |
title_sort | effect of layer thickness in layered aluminum matrix syntactic foam |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qianchenhao effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam AT liangchen effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam AT heziyang effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam AT jiweixi effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam |