Cargando…

Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam

This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Chenhao, Liang, Chen, He, Ziyang, Ji, Weixi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172
_version_ 1783485552387948544
author Qian, Chenhao
Liang, Chen
He, Ziyang
Ji, Weixi
author_facet Qian, Chenhao
Liang, Chen
He, Ziyang
Ji, Weixi
author_sort Qian, Chenhao
collection PubMed
description This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% small spheres (S) with different structures from two layers to five layers. The impact response and energy absorption were investigated by drop-weight impact tests. Under static loading, more layers led to higher yield stress and lower energy absorption. There were three types of progressive failures of layered syntactic form under impact loading. The failure propagation was examined and found to be dependent on the layer number and impact energy. Interestingly, layered syntactic foam absorbed more energy than both of its components in terms of ductility. The ductility of layered syntactic foam decreased with the increase in layer number. The peak stress of layered syntactic foam increased with the increase in layer number. Two-layered syntactic foam LS had the highest ductility under 60 J/g impact, as well as an energy absorption of 35 J/g, compared to other layered syntactic foams. Specifically, its component L had a ductility under 70 J/g and an energy absorption of 25 J/g, while component S had a ductility under 10 J/g and an energy absorption of 10 J/g.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69474442020-01-13 Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam Qian, Chenhao Liang, Chen He, Ziyang Ji, Weixi Materials (Basel) Article This work experimentally investigates the effect of layered structure on the static and impact response of a new layered syntactic foam developed for impact energy absorption. The layered syntactic foam had the same density of 1.6 g/cm(3) and the same components of 50% large spheres (L) and 50% small spheres (S) with different structures from two layers to five layers. The impact response and energy absorption were investigated by drop-weight impact tests. Under static loading, more layers led to higher yield stress and lower energy absorption. There were three types of progressive failures of layered syntactic form under impact loading. The failure propagation was examined and found to be dependent on the layer number and impact energy. Interestingly, layered syntactic foam absorbed more energy than both of its components in terms of ductility. The ductility of layered syntactic foam decreased with the increase in layer number. The peak stress of layered syntactic foam increased with the increase in layer number. Two-layered syntactic foam LS had the highest ductility under 60 J/g impact, as well as an energy absorption of 35 J/g, compared to other layered syntactic foams. Specifically, its component L had a ductility under 70 J/g and an energy absorption of 25 J/g, while component S had a ductility under 10 J/g and an energy absorption of 10 J/g. MDPI 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6947444/ /pubmed/31842303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Qian, Chenhao
Liang, Chen
He, Ziyang
Ji, Weixi
Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title_full Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title_fullStr Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title_short Effect of Layer Thickness in Layered Aluminum Matrix Syntactic Foam
title_sort effect of layer thickness in layered aluminum matrix syntactic foam
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12244172
work_keys_str_mv AT qianchenhao effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam
AT liangchen effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam
AT heziyang effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam
AT jiweixi effectoflayerthicknessinlayeredaluminummatrixsyntacticfoam