Cargando…
Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034 |
_version_ | 1783485554982125568 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kwang-No Choi, Jong-Il Kim, Yun Gi Boo, Ki Yung Kim, Do Young Choi, Yun Young Choi, Ha Young Kim, Dong-Hyeok Lee, Dae In Roh, Seung-Young Shim, Jaemin Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Young-Hoon |
author_facet | Lee, Kwang-No Choi, Jong-Il Kim, Yun Gi Boo, Ki Yung Kim, Do Young Choi, Yun Young Choi, Ha Young Kim, Dong-Hyeok Lee, Dae In Roh, Seung-Young Shim, Jaemin Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Young-Hoon |
author_sort | Lee, Kwang-No |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity of the CG formula with that of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae for dosing DOACs. A total of 6268 consecutive patients on anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) were retrospectively investigated. Among underweight and elderly patients, the CG formula underestimated renal function compared with the non-CG formulae. However, the concordant rate of drug indications between the CG and the non-CG formulae was approximately 94%. On-label uses under the three formulae were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (but not thromboembolism) compared to warfarin. Although we found differences in estimating renal function and the proportions of drug indications between the CG and non-CG formulae, the risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding were similar to those with warfarin regardless of which formula was used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69474552020-01-13 Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Lee, Kwang-No Choi, Jong-Il Kim, Yun Gi Boo, Ki Yung Kim, Do Young Choi, Yun Young Choi, Ha Young Kim, Dong-Hyeok Lee, Dae In Roh, Seung-Young Shim, Jaemin Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Young-Hoon J Clin Med Article The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity of the CG formula with that of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae for dosing DOACs. A total of 6268 consecutive patients on anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) were retrospectively investigated. Among underweight and elderly patients, the CG formula underestimated renal function compared with the non-CG formulae. However, the concordant rate of drug indications between the CG and the non-CG formulae was approximately 94%. On-label uses under the three formulae were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (but not thromboembolism) compared to warfarin. Although we found differences in estimating renal function and the proportions of drug indications between the CG and non-CG formulae, the risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding were similar to those with warfarin regardless of which formula was used. MDPI 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6947455/ /pubmed/31766393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Kwang-No Choi, Jong-Il Kim, Yun Gi Boo, Ki Yung Kim, Do Young Choi, Yun Young Choi, Ha Young Kim, Dong-Hyeok Lee, Dae In Roh, Seung-Young Shim, Jaemin Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Young-Hoon Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title | Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full | Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title_short | Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation |
title_sort | comparison of renal function estimation formulae for dosing direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekwangno comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT choijongil comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT kimyungi comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT bookiyung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT kimdoyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT choiyunyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT choihayoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT kimdonghyeok comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT leedaein comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT rohseungyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT shimjaemin comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT kimjinseok comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT kimyounghoon comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation |