Cargando…

Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kwang-No, Choi, Jong-Il, Kim, Yun Gi, Boo, Ki Yung, Kim, Do Young, Choi, Yun Young, Choi, Ha Young, Kim, Dong-Hyeok, Lee, Dae In, Roh, Seung-Young, Shim, Jaemin, Kim, Jin Seok, Kim, Young-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034
_version_ 1783485554982125568
author Lee, Kwang-No
Choi, Jong-Il
Kim, Yun Gi
Boo, Ki Yung
Kim, Do Young
Choi, Yun Young
Choi, Ha Young
Kim, Dong-Hyeok
Lee, Dae In
Roh, Seung-Young
Shim, Jaemin
Kim, Jin Seok
Kim, Young-Hoon
author_facet Lee, Kwang-No
Choi, Jong-Il
Kim, Yun Gi
Boo, Ki Yung
Kim, Do Young
Choi, Yun Young
Choi, Ha Young
Kim, Dong-Hyeok
Lee, Dae In
Roh, Seung-Young
Shim, Jaemin
Kim, Jin Seok
Kim, Young-Hoon
author_sort Lee, Kwang-No
collection PubMed
description The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity of the CG formula with that of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae for dosing DOACs. A total of 6268 consecutive patients on anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) were retrospectively investigated. Among underweight and elderly patients, the CG formula underestimated renal function compared with the non-CG formulae. However, the concordant rate of drug indications between the CG and the non-CG formulae was approximately 94%. On-label uses under the three formulae were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (but not thromboembolism) compared to warfarin. Although we found differences in estimating renal function and the proportions of drug indications between the CG and non-CG formulae, the risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding were similar to those with warfarin regardless of which formula was used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69474552020-01-13 Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Lee, Kwang-No Choi, Jong-Il Kim, Yun Gi Boo, Ki Yung Kim, Do Young Choi, Yun Young Choi, Ha Young Kim, Dong-Hyeok Lee, Dae In Roh, Seung-Young Shim, Jaemin Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Young-Hoon J Clin Med Article The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is recommended to guide clinicians in the choice of the appropriate dosage for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the performance of the CG formula varies depending on the patient’s age, weight, and degree of renal function. We aimed to compare the validity of the CG formula with that of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae for dosing DOACs. A total of 6268 consecutive patients on anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) were retrospectively investigated. Among underweight and elderly patients, the CG formula underestimated renal function compared with the non-CG formulae. However, the concordant rate of drug indications between the CG and the non-CG formulae was approximately 94%. On-label uses under the three formulae were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (but not thromboembolism) compared to warfarin. Although we found differences in estimating renal function and the proportions of drug indications between the CG and non-CG formulae, the risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding were similar to those with warfarin regardless of which formula was used. MDPI 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6947455/ /pubmed/31766393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Kwang-No
Choi, Jong-Il
Kim, Yun Gi
Boo, Ki Yung
Kim, Do Young
Choi, Yun Young
Choi, Ha Young
Kim, Dong-Hyeok
Lee, Dae In
Roh, Seung-Young
Shim, Jaemin
Kim, Jin Seok
Kim, Young-Hoon
Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Comparison of Renal Function Estimation Formulae for Dosing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort comparison of renal function estimation formulae for dosing direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122034
work_keys_str_mv AT leekwangno comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT choijongil comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kimyungi comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT bookiyung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kimdoyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT choiyunyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT choihayoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kimdonghyeok comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT leedaein comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT rohseungyoung comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT shimjaemin comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kimjinseok comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kimyounghoon comparisonofrenalfunctionestimationformulaefordosingdirectoralanticoagulantsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation