Cargando…

Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study

Aim: To analyze the accuracy capability of two computer-aided navigation procedures for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 dental implants were selected, which were randomly distributed into two study groups, namely, group A, consisting of those implants that were placed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso, Riad Deglow, Elena, Zubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro, Agustín-Panadero, Rubén, Hernández Montero, Sofía
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122123
_version_ 1783485568701693952
author Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso
Riad Deglow, Elena
Zubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Hernández Montero, Sofía
author_facet Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso
Riad Deglow, Elena
Zubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Hernández Montero, Sofía
author_sort Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso
collection PubMed
description Aim: To analyze the accuracy capability of two computer-aided navigation procedures for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 dental implants were selected, which were randomly distributed into two study groups, namely, group A, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided static navigation system (n = 20) (guided implant (GI)) and group B, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)). The placement of the implants from group A was performed using surgical templates that were designed using 3D implant-planning software based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D extraoral surface scan, and the placement of group B implants was planned and performed using the dynamic navigation system. After placing the dental implants, a second CBCT was performed and the degree of accuracy of the planning and placement of the implants was analyzed using therapeutic planning software and Student’s t-test. Results: The paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between GI and NI at the coronal (p = 0.6535) and apical (p = 0.9081) levels; however, statistically significant differences were observed between the angular deviations of GI and NI (p = 0.0272). Conclusion: Both computer-aided static and dynamic navigation procedures allow accurate implant placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69475132020-01-13 Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso Riad Deglow, Elena Zubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro Agustín-Panadero, Rubén Hernández Montero, Sofía J Clin Med Article Aim: To analyze the accuracy capability of two computer-aided navigation procedures for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 dental implants were selected, which were randomly distributed into two study groups, namely, group A, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided static navigation system (n = 20) (guided implant (GI)) and group B, consisting of those implants that were placed using a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)). The placement of the implants from group A was performed using surgical templates that were designed using 3D implant-planning software based on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D extraoral surface scan, and the placement of group B implants was planned and performed using the dynamic navigation system. After placing the dental implants, a second CBCT was performed and the degree of accuracy of the planning and placement of the implants was analyzed using therapeutic planning software and Student’s t-test. Results: The paired t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between GI and NI at the coronal (p = 0.6535) and apical (p = 0.9081) levels; however, statistically significant differences were observed between the angular deviations of GI and NI (p = 0.0272). Conclusion: Both computer-aided static and dynamic navigation procedures allow accurate implant placement. MDPI 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6947513/ /pubmed/31810351 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122123 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mediavilla Guzmán, Alfonso
Riad Deglow, Elena
Zubizarreta-Macho, Álvaro
Agustín-Panadero, Rubén
Hernández Montero, Sofía
Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title_full Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title_short Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study
title_sort accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static navigation for dental implant placement: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122123
work_keys_str_mv AT mediavillaguzmanalfonso accuracyofcomputeraideddynamicnavigationcomparedtocomputeraidedstaticnavigationfordentalimplantplacementaninvitrostudy
AT riaddeglowelena accuracyofcomputeraideddynamicnavigationcomparedtocomputeraidedstaticnavigationfordentalimplantplacementaninvitrostudy
AT zubizarretamachoalvaro accuracyofcomputeraideddynamicnavigationcomparedtocomputeraidedstaticnavigationfordentalimplantplacementaninvitrostudy
AT agustinpanaderoruben accuracyofcomputeraideddynamicnavigationcomparedtocomputeraidedstaticnavigationfordentalimplantplacementaninvitrostudy
AT hernandezmonterosofia accuracyofcomputeraideddynamicnavigationcomparedtocomputeraidedstaticnavigationfordentalimplantplacementaninvitrostudy