Cargando…

Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery

Background: Monopolar electrocautery (EC) is the surgical cutting and haemostatic tool most commonly used for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare EC efficacy in the treatment of patients affected by T1 or T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic squamous c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benazzo, Marco, Canzi, Pietro, Mauramati, Simone, Sovardi, Fabio, Occhini, Antonio, Maiorano, Eugenia, Trisolini, Giuseppe, Morbini, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122166
_version_ 1783485582505148416
author Benazzo, Marco
Canzi, Pietro
Mauramati, Simone
Sovardi, Fabio
Occhini, Antonio
Maiorano, Eugenia
Trisolini, Giuseppe
Morbini, Patrizia
author_facet Benazzo, Marco
Canzi, Pietro
Mauramati, Simone
Sovardi, Fabio
Occhini, Antonio
Maiorano, Eugenia
Trisolini, Giuseppe
Morbini, Patrizia
author_sort Benazzo, Marco
collection PubMed
description Background: Monopolar electrocautery (EC) is the surgical cutting and haemostatic tool most commonly used for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare EC efficacy in the treatment of patients affected by T1 or T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas with the more recently introduced laser fibres. Methods: We considered all TORS patients admitted to our department from January 2010 to June 2019. The outcomes of patients treated with Thulium: yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser (TY-TORS), CO(2) laser (CO(2)-TORS) and EC (EC-TORS) were analysed in order to assess surgical performances, functional outcomes and postoperative complications. Results: Twenty patients satisfied the enrolling criteria, of which nine underwent laser-TORS, and the remaining 11 underwent EC-TORS. In all candidates, TORS procedures were completed without the need for microscopic/open conversion. Close or positive margins were significantly more frequent in EC-TORS (p = 0.028). A considerable difference was found in overall functional parameters: times of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy removal and time of hospital discharge were significantly shorter in laser-TORS (p = 0.04, p = 0.05, p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: Laser-TORS showed better results in comparison with EC-TORS in term of tumour resection margins and patient functional outcomes. Our findings can be justified with the greater tissue thermal damage caused by EC-TORS, despite prospective randomized trials and increased patient numbers being needed to confirm these preliminary conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69475772020-01-13 Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery Benazzo, Marco Canzi, Pietro Mauramati, Simone Sovardi, Fabio Occhini, Antonio Maiorano, Eugenia Trisolini, Giuseppe Morbini, Patrizia J Clin Med Article Background: Monopolar electrocautery (EC) is the surgical cutting and haemostatic tool most commonly used for transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare EC efficacy in the treatment of patients affected by T1 or T2 oropharyngeal and supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas with the more recently introduced laser fibres. Methods: We considered all TORS patients admitted to our department from January 2010 to June 2019. The outcomes of patients treated with Thulium: yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) laser (TY-TORS), CO(2) laser (CO(2)-TORS) and EC (EC-TORS) were analysed in order to assess surgical performances, functional outcomes and postoperative complications. Results: Twenty patients satisfied the enrolling criteria, of which nine underwent laser-TORS, and the remaining 11 underwent EC-TORS. In all candidates, TORS procedures were completed without the need for microscopic/open conversion. Close or positive margins were significantly more frequent in EC-TORS (p = 0.028). A considerable difference was found in overall functional parameters: times of nasogastric tube and tracheostomy removal and time of hospital discharge were significantly shorter in laser-TORS (p = 0.04, p = 0.05, p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: Laser-TORS showed better results in comparison with EC-TORS in term of tumour resection margins and patient functional outcomes. Our findings can be justified with the greater tissue thermal damage caused by EC-TORS, despite prospective randomized trials and increased patient numbers being needed to confirm these preliminary conclusions. MDPI 2019-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6947577/ /pubmed/31817848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122166 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Benazzo, Marco
Canzi, Pietro
Mauramati, Simone
Sovardi, Fabio
Occhini, Antonio
Maiorano, Eugenia
Trisolini, Giuseppe
Morbini, Patrizia
Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title_full Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title_fullStr Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title_full_unstemmed Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title_short Transoral Robot-Assisted Surgery in Supraglottic and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Laser Versus Monopolar Electrocautery
title_sort transoral robot-assisted surgery in supraglottic and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: laser versus monopolar electrocautery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122166
work_keys_str_mv AT benazzomarco transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT canzipietro transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT mauramatisimone transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT sovardifabio transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT occhiniantonio transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT maioranoeugenia transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT trisolinigiuseppe transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery
AT morbinipatrizia transoralrobotassistedsurgeryinsupraglotticandoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomalaserversusmonopolarelectrocautery