Cargando…
Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery
STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVES: A narrative review of the literature on the current advances and limitations in quality and safety improvement initiatives in spine surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE focusing on 3 preidentified concepts: (1)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219839699 |
_version_ | 1783485603625566208 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Fan Wilson, Jamie R. F. Badhiwala, Jetan H. Santaguida, Carlo Weber, Michael H. Wilson, Jefferson R. Fehlings, Michael G. |
author_facet | Jiang, Fan Wilson, Jamie R. F. Badhiwala, Jetan H. Santaguida, Carlo Weber, Michael H. Wilson, Jefferson R. Fehlings, Michael G. |
author_sort | Jiang, Fan |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVES: A narrative review of the literature on the current advances and limitations in quality and safety improvement initiatives in spine surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE focusing on 3 preidentified concepts: (1) quality and safety improvement, (2) reporting of outcomes and adverse events, and (3) prediction model and practice guidelines. The search was conducted under appropriate subject headings and using relevant text words. Articles were screened, and manuscripts relevant to this discussion were included in the narrative review. RESULTS: Quality and safety improvement remains a major research focus attracting investigators from the global spine community. Multiple databases and registries have been developed for the purpose of generating data and monitoring the progress of quality and safety improvement initiatives. The development of various prediction models and clinical practice guidelines has helped shape the care of spine patients in the modern era. With the reported success of exemplary programs initiated by the Northwestern and Seattle Spine Team, other quality and safety improvement initiatives are anticipated to follow. However, despite these advancements, the reporting metrics for outcomes and adverse events remain heterogeneous in the literature. CONCLUSION: Constant surveillance and continuous improvement of the quality and safety of spine treatments is imperative in modern health care. Although great advancement has been made, issues with reporting outcomes and adverse events persist, and improvement in this regard is certainly needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69476762020-01-13 Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery Jiang, Fan Wilson, Jamie R. F. Badhiwala, Jetan H. Santaguida, Carlo Weber, Michael H. Wilson, Jefferson R. Fehlings, Michael G. Global Spine J Overview STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVES: A narrative review of the literature on the current advances and limitations in quality and safety improvement initiatives in spine surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE focusing on 3 preidentified concepts: (1) quality and safety improvement, (2) reporting of outcomes and adverse events, and (3) prediction model and practice guidelines. The search was conducted under appropriate subject headings and using relevant text words. Articles were screened, and manuscripts relevant to this discussion were included in the narrative review. RESULTS: Quality and safety improvement remains a major research focus attracting investigators from the global spine community. Multiple databases and registries have been developed for the purpose of generating data and monitoring the progress of quality and safety improvement initiatives. The development of various prediction models and clinical practice guidelines has helped shape the care of spine patients in the modern era. With the reported success of exemplary programs initiated by the Northwestern and Seattle Spine Team, other quality and safety improvement initiatives are anticipated to follow. However, despite these advancements, the reporting metrics for outcomes and adverse events remain heterogeneous in the literature. CONCLUSION: Constant surveillance and continuous improvement of the quality and safety of spine treatments is imperative in modern health care. Although great advancement has been made, issues with reporting outcomes and adverse events persist, and improvement in this regard is certainly needed. SAGE Publications 2020-01-06 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6947676/ /pubmed/31934516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219839699 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Overview Jiang, Fan Wilson, Jamie R. F. Badhiwala, Jetan H. Santaguida, Carlo Weber, Michael H. Wilson, Jefferson R. Fehlings, Michael G. Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title | Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title_full | Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title_fullStr | Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title_short | Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery |
title_sort | quality and safety improvement in spine surgery |
topic | Overview |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219839699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangfan qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT wilsonjamierf qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT badhiwalajetanh qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT santaguidacarlo qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT webermichaelh qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT wilsonjeffersonr qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery AT fehlingsmichaelg qualityandsafetyimprovementinspinesurgery |