Cargando…

Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal‐setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics. DESIGN: Randomized controlled tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodard, LeChauncy, Kamdar, Nipa, Hundt, Natalie, Gordon, Howard S., Hertz, Brian, Amspoker, Amber B., Kiefer, Lea, Mehta, Praveen, Odom, Edward, Rajan, Suja, Stone, Elizabeth, Jones, Lindsey, Naik, Aanand D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.99
_version_ 1783485606273220608
author Woodard, LeChauncy
Kamdar, Nipa
Hundt, Natalie
Gordon, Howard S.
Hertz, Brian
Amspoker, Amber B.
Kiefer, Lea
Mehta, Praveen
Odom, Edward
Rajan, Suja
Stone, Elizabeth
Jones, Lindsey
Naik, Aanand D.
author_facet Woodard, LeChauncy
Kamdar, Nipa
Hundt, Natalie
Gordon, Howard S.
Hertz, Brian
Amspoker, Amber B.
Kiefer, Lea
Mehta, Praveen
Odom, Edward
Rajan, Suja
Stone, Elizabeth
Jones, Lindsey
Naik, Aanand D.
author_sort Woodard, LeChauncy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal‐setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the EPIC intervention with enhanced usual care (EUC) at five clinic sites located in the greater Chicago and Houston areas. We will measure differences in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and diabetes distress scale scores among study arms at post‐intervention and maintenance (6 months post‐intervention). We will evaluate implementation of the intervention across sites using the RE‐AIM framework. We will evaluate reach by comparing the per cent and characteristics of enrolled study participants among all potentially eligible participants in the given clinic population. Adoption is reflected by the characteristics of the involved providers and the number of intervention sessions conducted. Implementation of EPIC will be evaluated by number of sessions delivered, participants' evaluation of group sessions, and evaluation of quality of goal‐setting. PATIENTS: We randomized 280 participants with equal allocation to EPIC and enhanced usual care (EUC). RESULTS: At baseline, the groups were similar with the exception that EUC participants were more likely to have prior diabetes education. At baseline, participants were predominately older men who have poorly controlled diabetes (mean HbA(1c) = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%]) and moderate levels of diabetes distress (mean DDS = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid effectiveness‐implementation protocol is designed to accelerate the translation of a patient‐centred diabetes care intervention from research to clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69476902020-01-09 Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial Woodard, LeChauncy Kamdar, Nipa Hundt, Natalie Gordon, Howard S. Hertz, Brian Amspoker, Amber B. Kiefer, Lea Mehta, Praveen Odom, Edward Rajan, Suja Stone, Elizabeth Jones, Lindsey Naik, Aanand D. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative goal‐setting intervention (Empowering Patients in Chronic Care [EPIC]) to improve glycaemic control and diabetesrelated distress, and implementation into routine care across multiple primary care clinics. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of the EPIC intervention with enhanced usual care (EUC) at five clinic sites located in the greater Chicago and Houston areas. We will measure differences in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and diabetes distress scale scores among study arms at post‐intervention and maintenance (6 months post‐intervention). We will evaluate implementation of the intervention across sites using the RE‐AIM framework. We will evaluate reach by comparing the per cent and characteristics of enrolled study participants among all potentially eligible participants in the given clinic population. Adoption is reflected by the characteristics of the involved providers and the number of intervention sessions conducted. Implementation of EPIC will be evaluated by number of sessions delivered, participants' evaluation of group sessions, and evaluation of quality of goal‐setting. PATIENTS: We randomized 280 participants with equal allocation to EPIC and enhanced usual care (EUC). RESULTS: At baseline, the groups were similar with the exception that EUC participants were more likely to have prior diabetes education. At baseline, participants were predominately older men who have poorly controlled diabetes (mean HbA(1c) = 76 mmol/mol [9.1%]) and moderate levels of diabetes distress (mean DDS = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid effectiveness‐implementation protocol is designed to accelerate the translation of a patient‐centred diabetes care intervention from research to clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6947690/ /pubmed/31922026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.99 Text en Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Woodard, LeChauncy
Kamdar, Nipa
Hundt, Natalie
Gordon, Howard S.
Hertz, Brian
Amspoker, Amber B.
Kiefer, Lea
Mehta, Praveen
Odom, Edward
Rajan, Suja
Stone, Elizabeth
Jones, Lindsey
Naik, Aanand D.
Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title_full Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title_fullStr Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title_short Empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: Protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
title_sort empowering patients in chronic care to improve diabetes distress and glycaemic control: protocol for a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.99
work_keys_str_mv AT woodardlechauncy empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT kamdarnipa empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT hundtnatalie empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT gordonhowards empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT hertzbrian empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT amspokeramberb empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT kieferlea empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT mehtapraveen empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT odomedward empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT rajansuja empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT stoneelizabeth empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT joneslindsey empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT naikaanandd empoweringpatientsinchroniccaretoimprovediabetesdistressandglycaemiccontrolprotocolforahybridimplementationeffectivenessclinicaltrial