Cargando…
Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111 |
_version_ | 1783485623297900544 |
---|---|
author | Šipula, David Kozák, Milan Šipula, Jaroslav Homza, Miroslav Plášek, Jiří |
author_facet | Šipula, David Kozák, Milan Šipula, Jaroslav Homza, Miroslav Plášek, Jiří |
author_sort | Šipula, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS: 30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology. CONCLUSIONS: AV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6947762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69477622020-01-13 Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study Šipula, David Kozák, Milan Šipula, Jaroslav Homza, Miroslav Plášek, Jiří Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS: 30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology. CONCLUSIONS: AV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure. De Gruyter 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6947762/ /pubmed/31934639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111 Text en © 2019 David Šipula et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Šipula, David Kozák, Milan Šipula, Jaroslav Homza, Miroslav Plášek, Jiří Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title | Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title_full | Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title_short | Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study |
title_sort | cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sipuladavid cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy AT kozakmilan cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy AT sipulajaroslav cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy AT homzamiroslav cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy AT plasekjiri cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy |