Cargando…

Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šipula, David, Kozák, Milan, Šipula, Jaroslav, Homza, Miroslav, Plášek, Jiří
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111
_version_ 1783485623297900544
author Šipula, David
Kozák, Milan
Šipula, Jaroslav
Homza, Miroslav
Plášek, Jiří
author_facet Šipula, David
Kozák, Milan
Šipula, Jaroslav
Homza, Miroslav
Plášek, Jiří
author_sort Šipula, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS: 30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology. CONCLUSIONS: AV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69477622020-01-13 Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study Šipula, David Kozák, Milan Šipula, Jaroslav Homza, Miroslav Plášek, Jiří Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy – Defibrillators (CRT-D). The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for cardiac strain speckle tracking to optimize the performance of CRT-D in non-responding patients. METHODS: 30 patients not responding to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators after 3 months were randomly divided into control and intervention groups. Atrioventricular interval was adjusted so that E and A waves did not overlap, the interventricular interval was subsequently optimized to yield maximum improvement of the sum of longitudinal+radial+circumferential strains. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA improvement 3 months after optimization were evaluated and use of other strain combinations assessed. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the (combined) strain change and LVEF improvement was detected (p<0.01). 75% of patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure who did not respond to the original CRT-D reacted favorably with significant LVEF and NYHA improvement. The area strain was the best predictor of LVEF/NYHA improvement in those patients. No significant improvement was recorded in patients with ischemic etiology. CONCLUSIONS: AV and VV optimization based on speckle tracking is a very promising method potentially leading to a significant improvement of the outcome of CRT-D, especially in patients with non-ischemic etiology of heart failure. De Gruyter 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6947762/ /pubmed/31934639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111 Text en © 2019 David Šipula et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Šipula, David
Kozák, Milan
Šipula, Jaroslav
Homza, Miroslav
Plášek, Jiří
Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title_full Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title_fullStr Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title_short Cardiac Strains As a Tool for Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-responders: a Pilot Study
title_sort cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31934639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0111
work_keys_str_mv AT sipuladavid cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy
AT kozakmilan cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy
AT sipulajaroslav cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy
AT homzamiroslav cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy
AT plasekjiri cardiacstrainsasatoolforoptimizationofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyinnonrespondersapilotstudy