Cargando…

Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate if a laryngeal mask could improve respiratory condition during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for atrial fibrillation were divided into two groups (Facemask group; n = 10, L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koyama, Takashi, Kobayashi, Masanori, Ichikawa, Tomohide, Wakabayashi, Yasushi, Toma, Daiki, Abe, Hidetoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0924-2
_version_ 1783485643366596608
author Koyama, Takashi
Kobayashi, Masanori
Ichikawa, Tomohide
Wakabayashi, Yasushi
Toma, Daiki
Abe, Hidetoshi
author_facet Koyama, Takashi
Kobayashi, Masanori
Ichikawa, Tomohide
Wakabayashi, Yasushi
Toma, Daiki
Abe, Hidetoshi
author_sort Koyama, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate if a laryngeal mask could improve respiratory condition during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for atrial fibrillation were divided into two groups (Facemask group; n = 10, Laryngeal mask group; n = 14). All patients were completely sedated under intravenous anesthesia and fitted with artificial respirators during the RFCA. The capnography waveforms and their differential coefficients were analyzed to evaluate the changes of end-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) values, respiratory intervals, expiratory durations, and inspiratory durations. RESULTS: During the RFCA, ETCO(2) values of the laryngeal mask group were higher than those of the facemask group (36.0 vs. 29.2 mmHg, p = 0.005). The respiratory interval was significantly longer in the laryngeal mask group than those in the facemask group (4.28 s vs.5.25 s, p < 0.001). In both expiratory and inspiratory phases, the mean of the maximum and minimum values of CO(2) was significantly higher when using a laryngeal mask than when using a facemask. The inspiratory-expiratory ratio of the laryngeal mask group was significantly larger than that of the facemask group (1.59 vs. 1.27, p < 0.001). The total procedure duration, fluoroscopic duration and the ablation energy were significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the facemask group. The ETCO(2) value is the most influential parameter on the fluoroscopic duration during the RFCA procedure (β = − 0.477, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a laryngeal mask could stabilize respiration during intravenous anesthesia, which could improve the efficiency of RFCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6947869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69478692020-01-09 Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation Koyama, Takashi Kobayashi, Masanori Ichikawa, Tomohide Wakabayashi, Yasushi Toma, Daiki Abe, Hidetoshi BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate if a laryngeal mask could improve respiratory condition during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for atrial fibrillation were divided into two groups (Facemask group; n = 10, Laryngeal mask group; n = 14). All patients were completely sedated under intravenous anesthesia and fitted with artificial respirators during the RFCA. The capnography waveforms and their differential coefficients were analyzed to evaluate the changes of end-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) values, respiratory intervals, expiratory durations, and inspiratory durations. RESULTS: During the RFCA, ETCO(2) values of the laryngeal mask group were higher than those of the facemask group (36.0 vs. 29.2 mmHg, p = 0.005). The respiratory interval was significantly longer in the laryngeal mask group than those in the facemask group (4.28 s vs.5.25 s, p < 0.001). In both expiratory and inspiratory phases, the mean of the maximum and minimum values of CO(2) was significantly higher when using a laryngeal mask than when using a facemask. The inspiratory-expiratory ratio of the laryngeal mask group was significantly larger than that of the facemask group (1.59 vs. 1.27, p < 0.001). The total procedure duration, fluoroscopic duration and the ablation energy were significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the facemask group. The ETCO(2) value is the most influential parameter on the fluoroscopic duration during the RFCA procedure (β = − 0.477, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a laryngeal mask could stabilize respiration during intravenous anesthesia, which could improve the efficiency of RFCA. BioMed Central 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6947869/ /pubmed/31910797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0924-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koyama, Takashi
Kobayashi, Masanori
Ichikawa, Tomohide
Wakabayashi, Yasushi
Toma, Daiki
Abe, Hidetoshi
Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title_full Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title_fullStr Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title_short Laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
title_sort laryngeal mask versus facemask in the respiratory management during catheter ablation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6947869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31910797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0924-2
work_keys_str_mv AT koyamatakashi laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation
AT kobayashimasanori laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation
AT ichikawatomohide laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation
AT wakabayashiyasushi laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation
AT tomadaiki laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation
AT abehidetoshi laryngealmaskversusfacemaskintherespiratorymanagementduringcatheterablation