Cargando…

Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?

Nonunions represent one of the major indications for clinical settings with stem cell-based therapies. The objective of this research was to systematically assess the current evidence for the efficacy of bone marrow-derived cell-based approaches associated or not with bone scaffolds for the treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palombella, Silvia, Lopa, Silvia, Gianola, Silvia, Zagra, Luigi, Moretti, Matteo, Lovati, Arianna B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3715964
_version_ 1783485722438664192
author Palombella, Silvia
Lopa, Silvia
Gianola, Silvia
Zagra, Luigi
Moretti, Matteo
Lovati, Arianna B.
author_facet Palombella, Silvia
Lopa, Silvia
Gianola, Silvia
Zagra, Luigi
Moretti, Matteo
Lovati, Arianna B.
author_sort Palombella, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Nonunions represent one of the major indications for clinical settings with stem cell-based therapies. The objective of this research was to systematically assess the current evidence for the efficacy of bone marrow-derived cell-based approaches associated or not with bone scaffolds for the treatment of nonunions. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and CENTRAL up to July 2019 for clinical studies focused on the use of cell-based therapies and bone marrow derivatives to treat bone nonunions. Three investigators independently extracted the data and appraised the risk of bias. We analysed 27 studies including a total number of 347 participants exposed to four interventions: bone marrow concentrate (BMAC), BMAC combined with scaffold (BMAC/Scaffold), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), and BMSC combined with scaffold (BMSC/Scaffold). Two controlled studies showed a positive trend in bone healing in favour of BMAC/Scaffold or BMSC/Scaffold treatment against bone autograft, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.11, 95% CI -0.05; 0.28). Among single cohort studies, the highest mean pooled proportion of healing rate was reported for BMAC (77%; 95% CI 63%-89%; 107 cases, n = 8) and BMAC/Scaffold treatments with (71%; 95% CI 50%-89%; 117 cases, n = 8) at 6 months of follow-up. At 12 months of follow-up, an increasing proportion of bone healing was observed in all the treatment groups, ranging from 81% to 100%. These results indicate that BMAC or BMAC/Scaffold might be considered as the primary choice to treat nonunions with a successful healing rate at a midterm follow-up. Moreover, this meta-analysis highlighted that the presence of a scaffold positively influences the healing rate at a long-term follow-up. More case-control studies are still needed to support the clinical improvement of cell-based therapies against autografts, up to now considered as the gold standard for the treatment of nonunions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6948316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69483162020-01-16 Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment? Palombella, Silvia Lopa, Silvia Gianola, Silvia Zagra, Luigi Moretti, Matteo Lovati, Arianna B. Stem Cells Int Review Article Nonunions represent one of the major indications for clinical settings with stem cell-based therapies. The objective of this research was to systematically assess the current evidence for the efficacy of bone marrow-derived cell-based approaches associated or not with bone scaffolds for the treatment of nonunions. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and CENTRAL up to July 2019 for clinical studies focused on the use of cell-based therapies and bone marrow derivatives to treat bone nonunions. Three investigators independently extracted the data and appraised the risk of bias. We analysed 27 studies including a total number of 347 participants exposed to four interventions: bone marrow concentrate (BMAC), BMAC combined with scaffold (BMAC/Scaffold), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), and BMSC combined with scaffold (BMSC/Scaffold). Two controlled studies showed a positive trend in bone healing in favour of BMAC/Scaffold or BMSC/Scaffold treatment against bone autograft, although the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.11, 95% CI -0.05; 0.28). Among single cohort studies, the highest mean pooled proportion of healing rate was reported for BMAC (77%; 95% CI 63%-89%; 107 cases, n = 8) and BMAC/Scaffold treatments with (71%; 95% CI 50%-89%; 117 cases, n = 8) at 6 months of follow-up. At 12 months of follow-up, an increasing proportion of bone healing was observed in all the treatment groups, ranging from 81% to 100%. These results indicate that BMAC or BMAC/Scaffold might be considered as the primary choice to treat nonunions with a successful healing rate at a midterm follow-up. Moreover, this meta-analysis highlighted that the presence of a scaffold positively influences the healing rate at a long-term follow-up. More case-control studies are still needed to support the clinical improvement of cell-based therapies against autografts, up to now considered as the gold standard for the treatment of nonunions. Hindawi 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6948316/ /pubmed/31949437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3715964 Text en Copyright © 2019 Silvia Palombella et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Palombella, Silvia
Lopa, Silvia
Gianola, Silvia
Zagra, Luigi
Moretti, Matteo
Lovati, Arianna B.
Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title_full Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title_fullStr Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title_full_unstemmed Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title_short Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapies to Heal Long-Bone Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis—Which Is the Best Available Treatment?
title_sort bone marrow-derived cell therapies to heal long-bone nonunions: a systematic review and meta-analysis—which is the best available treatment?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3715964
work_keys_str_mv AT palombellasilvia bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment
AT lopasilvia bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment
AT gianolasilvia bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment
AT zagraluigi bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment
AT morettimatteo bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment
AT lovatiariannab bonemarrowderivedcelltherapiestoheallongbonenonunionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswhichisthebestavailabletreatment