Cargando…
Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease
OBJECTIVE: To study the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and visual electrophysiology testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A cross-sectional, hospital-based study: 25 AD subjects and 25 controls were recruited. Candidates who fulfil the criteria with normal ocul...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6248185 |
_version_ | 1783485730259992576 |
---|---|
author | Ngoo, Qi Zhe Wan Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Ab Razak, Asrenee |
author_facet | Ngoo, Qi Zhe Wan Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Ab Razak, Asrenee |
author_sort | Ngoo, Qi Zhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and visual electrophysiology testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A cross-sectional, hospital-based study: 25 AD subjects and 25 controls were recruited. Candidates who fulfil the criteria with normal ocular examinations were made to proceed with scanning laser polarimetry, pattern electroretinogram (PERG), and pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) examinations of the right eye. RNFL thickness, PERG, and PVEP readings were evaluated. RESULTS: In AD, the mean of average RNFL thickness was 45.28 μm, SD = 3.61, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), while the superior RNFL thickness was 54.44 μm, SD = 2.85, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and inferior RNFL thickness was 47.11 μm, SD = 4.52, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). For PERG, the mean P50 latency was 63.88 ms, SD = 7.94, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and the mean amplitudes of P50 waves were 1.79 μV, SD = 0.64, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and N95 waves were 2.43 μV, SD = 0.90, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). For PVEP, the mean latency of P100 was 119.00 ms, SD = 9.07, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), while the mean latency of N135 was 145.20 ms, SD = 8.53, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). The mean amplitude of P100 waves was 3.71 μV, SD = 1.60, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), whereas the mean amplitude of N135 waves was 3.67 μV, SD = 2.02, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). RNFL thickness strongly correlates with PERG readings, with P50 latency R = 0.582, R2 = 0.339, P=0.002 (P < 0.05), amplitude of P50 wave at R = 0.749, R2 = 0.561, P ≤ 0.001 (P < 0.05), and amplitude of N95 wave at R = 0.500, R2 = 0.250, P=0.011 (P < 0.05). No significant difference and correlation were observed on PVEP readings. CONCLUSION: The mean of the average, superior and inferior RNFL thickness were significantly lower in the AD group compared with control. There is also significant difference of PERG and PVEP parameters between AD and controls. Regression analysis showed average RNFL thickness having significantly linear relationship with the PERG parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6948353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69483532020-01-16 Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Ngoo, Qi Zhe Wan Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Ab Razak, Asrenee J Ophthalmol Research Article OBJECTIVE: To study the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and visual electrophysiology testing in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A cross-sectional, hospital-based study: 25 AD subjects and 25 controls were recruited. Candidates who fulfil the criteria with normal ocular examinations were made to proceed with scanning laser polarimetry, pattern electroretinogram (PERG), and pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) examinations of the right eye. RNFL thickness, PERG, and PVEP readings were evaluated. RESULTS: In AD, the mean of average RNFL thickness was 45.28 μm, SD = 3.61, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), while the superior RNFL thickness was 54.44 μm, SD = 2.85, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and inferior RNFL thickness was 47.11 μm, SD = 4.52, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). For PERG, the mean P50 latency was 63.88 ms, SD = 7.94, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and the mean amplitudes of P50 waves were 1.79 μV, SD = 0.64, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05) and N95 waves were 2.43 μV, SD = 0.90, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). For PVEP, the mean latency of P100 was 119.00 ms, SD = 9.07, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), while the mean latency of N135 was 145.20 ms, SD = 8.53, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). The mean amplitude of P100 waves was 3.71 μV, SD = 1.60, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05), whereas the mean amplitude of N135 waves was 3.67 μV, SD = 2.02, P < 0.001 (P < 0.05). RNFL thickness strongly correlates with PERG readings, with P50 latency R = 0.582, R2 = 0.339, P=0.002 (P < 0.05), amplitude of P50 wave at R = 0.749, R2 = 0.561, P ≤ 0.001 (P < 0.05), and amplitude of N95 wave at R = 0.500, R2 = 0.250, P=0.011 (P < 0.05). No significant difference and correlation were observed on PVEP readings. CONCLUSION: The mean of the average, superior and inferior RNFL thickness were significantly lower in the AD group compared with control. There is also significant difference of PERG and PVEP parameters between AD and controls. Regression analysis showed average RNFL thickness having significantly linear relationship with the PERG parameters. Hindawi 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6948353/ /pubmed/31949951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6248185 Text en Copyright © 2019 Qi Zhe Ngoo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ngoo, Qi Zhe Wan Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Ab Razak, Asrenee Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title | Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full | Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title_short | Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, Electroretinogram and Visual Evoked Potential in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease |
title_sort | evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in patients with alzheimer's disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6248185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngooqizhe evaluationofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknesselectroretinogramandvisualevokedpotentialinpatientswithalzheimersdisease AT wanhitamwanhazabbah evaluationofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknesselectroretinogramandvisualevokedpotentialinpatientswithalzheimersdisease AT abrazakasrenee evaluationofretinalnervefiberlayerthicknesselectroretinogramandvisualevokedpotentialinpatientswithalzheimersdisease |