Cargando…

What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets

INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riddell, Jeff, Brown, Alisha, Robins, Lynne, Nauman, Rafae, Yang, Jeanette, Jauregui, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913814
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004
_version_ 1783485793035091968
author Riddell, Jeff
Brown, Alisha
Robins, Lynne
Nauman, Rafae
Yang, Jeanette
Jauregui, Joshua
author_facet Riddell, Jeff
Brown, Alisha
Robins, Lynne
Nauman, Rafae
Yang, Jeanette
Jauregui, Joshua
author_sort Riddell, Jeff
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery tool, little attention has been paid to the nature of the conversation occurring on Twitter. We aim to describe how influential EPs use Twitter by characterizing the language, purpose, frequencies, content, and degree of engagement of their tweets. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods analysis following a combined content analysis approach. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of a sample of tweets from the 61 most influential EPs on Twitter. We present descriptive tweet characteristics and noteworthy themes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1375 unique tweets from 57 unique users, representing 93% of the influential Twitter EPs. A majority of tweets (1104/1375, 80%) elicited some response in the form of retweets, likes, or replies, demonstrating community engagement. The qualitative analysis identified 15 distinct categories of tweets. CONCLUSION: Influential EPs on Twitter were engaged in largely medical conversations in which most messages generated some form of interaction. They shared resources and opinions while also building social rapport in a community of practice. This data can help EPs make informed decisions about social media engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6948680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69486802020-01-13 What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets Riddell, Jeff Brown, Alisha Robins, Lynne Nauman, Rafae Yang, Jeanette Jauregui, Joshua West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery tool, little attention has been paid to the nature of the conversation occurring on Twitter. We aim to describe how influential EPs use Twitter by characterizing the language, purpose, frequencies, content, and degree of engagement of their tweets. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods analysis following a combined content analysis approach. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of a sample of tweets from the 61 most influential EPs on Twitter. We present descriptive tweet characteristics and noteworthy themes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1375 unique tweets from 57 unique users, representing 93% of the influential Twitter EPs. A majority of tweets (1104/1375, 80%) elicited some response in the form of retweets, likes, or replies, demonstrating community engagement. The qualitative analysis identified 15 distinct categories of tweets. CONCLUSION: Influential EPs on Twitter were engaged in largely medical conversations in which most messages generated some form of interaction. They shared resources and opinions while also building social rapport in a community of practice. This data can help EPs make informed decisions about social media engagement. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-01 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6948680/ /pubmed/31913814 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Riddell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Riddell, Jeff
Brown, Alisha
Robins, Lynne
Nauman, Rafae
Yang, Jeanette
Jauregui, Joshua
What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title_full What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title_fullStr What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title_full_unstemmed What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title_short What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
title_sort what’s all the chatter? a mixed-methods analysis of emergency physicians’ tweets
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913814
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004
work_keys_str_mv AT riddelljeff whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets
AT brownalisha whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets
AT robinslynne whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets
AT naumanrafae whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets
AT yangjeanette whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets
AT jaureguijoshua whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets