Cargando…
What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets
INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913814 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004 |
_version_ | 1783485793035091968 |
---|---|
author | Riddell, Jeff Brown, Alisha Robins, Lynne Nauman, Rafae Yang, Jeanette Jauregui, Joshua |
author_facet | Riddell, Jeff Brown, Alisha Robins, Lynne Nauman, Rafae Yang, Jeanette Jauregui, Joshua |
author_sort | Riddell, Jeff |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery tool, little attention has been paid to the nature of the conversation occurring on Twitter. We aim to describe how influential EPs use Twitter by characterizing the language, purpose, frequencies, content, and degree of engagement of their tweets. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods analysis following a combined content analysis approach. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of a sample of tweets from the 61 most influential EPs on Twitter. We present descriptive tweet characteristics and noteworthy themes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1375 unique tweets from 57 unique users, representing 93% of the influential Twitter EPs. A majority of tweets (1104/1375, 80%) elicited some response in the form of retweets, likes, or replies, demonstrating community engagement. The qualitative analysis identified 15 distinct categories of tweets. CONCLUSION: Influential EPs on Twitter were engaged in largely medical conversations in which most messages generated some form of interaction. They shared resources and opinions while also building social rapport in a community of practice. This data can help EPs make informed decisions about social media engagement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6948680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69486802020-01-13 What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets Riddell, Jeff Brown, Alisha Robins, Lynne Nauman, Rafae Yang, Jeanette Jauregui, Joshua West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: Twitter is growing in popularity and influence among emergency physicians (EP), with over 2200 self-identified EP users. As Twitter’s popularity has increased among EPs so too has its influence. While there has been debate about the value of Twitter as an effective educational delivery tool, little attention has been paid to the nature of the conversation occurring on Twitter. We aim to describe how influential EPs use Twitter by characterizing the language, purpose, frequencies, content, and degree of engagement of their tweets. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods analysis following a combined content analysis approach. We conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses of a sample of tweets from the 61 most influential EPs on Twitter. We present descriptive tweet characteristics and noteworthy themes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1375 unique tweets from 57 unique users, representing 93% of the influential Twitter EPs. A majority of tweets (1104/1375, 80%) elicited some response in the form of retweets, likes, or replies, demonstrating community engagement. The qualitative analysis identified 15 distinct categories of tweets. CONCLUSION: Influential EPs on Twitter were engaged in largely medical conversations in which most messages generated some form of interaction. They shared resources and opinions while also building social rapport in a community of practice. This data can help EPs make informed decisions about social media engagement. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-01 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6948680/ /pubmed/31913814 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Riddell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Riddell, Jeff Brown, Alisha Robins, Lynne Nauman, Rafae Yang, Jeanette Jauregui, Joshua What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title | What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title_full | What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title_fullStr | What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title_full_unstemmed | What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title_short | What’s All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians’ Tweets |
title_sort | what’s all the chatter? a mixed-methods analysis of emergency physicians’ tweets |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913814 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riddelljeff whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets AT brownalisha whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets AT robinslynne whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets AT naumanrafae whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets AT yangjeanette whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets AT jaureguijoshua whatsallthechatteramixedmethodsanalysisofemergencyphysicianstweets |