Cargando…
Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250 |
_version_ | 1783485801973153792 |
---|---|
author | Barel-Ben David, Yael Garty, Erez S. Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet |
author_facet | Barel-Ben David, Yael Garty, Erez S. Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet |
author_sort | Barel-Ben David, Yael |
collection | PubMed |
description | In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write for news media about science. On these general news platforms, scientists' stories would have to compete for attention with other news stories on hard (e.g. politics) and entertaining (e.g. celebrity news) topics written by professional writers. Do they stand a chance? This study aimed to quantitatively characterize audience interactions as an indicator of interest in science news stories authored by early career scientists (henceforth ‘scientists’) trained to function as science reporters, as compared to news items written by reporters and published in the same news outlets. To measure users' behavior, we collected data on the number of clicks, likes, comments and average time spent on page. The sample was composed of 150 science items written by 50 scientists trained to contribute popular science stories in the Davidson Institute of Science Education reporters’ program and published on two major Israeli news websites—Mako and Ynet between July 2015 to January 2018. Each science item was paired with another item written by the website’s organic reporter, and published on the same channel as the science story (e.g., tourism, health) and the same close time. Overall significant differences were not found in the public's engagement with the different items. Although, on one website there was a significant difference on two out of four engagement types, the second website did not have any difference, e.g., people did not click, like or comment more on items written by organic reporters than on the stories written by scientists. This creates an optimistic starting point for filling the science news void by scientists as science reporters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6948730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69487302020-01-17 Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists Barel-Ben David, Yael Garty, Erez S. Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet PLoS One Research Article In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write for news media about science. On these general news platforms, scientists' stories would have to compete for attention with other news stories on hard (e.g. politics) and entertaining (e.g. celebrity news) topics written by professional writers. Do they stand a chance? This study aimed to quantitatively characterize audience interactions as an indicator of interest in science news stories authored by early career scientists (henceforth ‘scientists’) trained to function as science reporters, as compared to news items written by reporters and published in the same news outlets. To measure users' behavior, we collected data on the number of clicks, likes, comments and average time spent on page. The sample was composed of 150 science items written by 50 scientists trained to contribute popular science stories in the Davidson Institute of Science Education reporters’ program and published on two major Israeli news websites—Mako and Ynet between July 2015 to January 2018. Each science item was paired with another item written by the website’s organic reporter, and published on the same channel as the science story (e.g., tourism, health) and the same close time. Overall significant differences were not found in the public's engagement with the different items. Although, on one website there was a significant difference on two out of four engagement types, the second website did not have any difference, e.g., people did not click, like or comment more on items written by organic reporters than on the stories written by scientists. This creates an optimistic starting point for filling the science news void by scientists as science reporters. Public Library of Science 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6948730/ /pubmed/31914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250 Text en © 2020 Barel-Ben David et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barel-Ben David, Yael Garty, Erez S. Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title | Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title_full | Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title_fullStr | Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title_full_unstemmed | Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title_short | Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
title_sort | can scientists fill the science journalism void? online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barelbendavidyael canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists AT gartyerezs canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists AT baramtsabariayelet canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists |