Cargando…

Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists

In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barel-Ben David, Yael, Garty, Erez S., Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250
_version_ 1783485801973153792
author Barel-Ben David, Yael
Garty, Erez S.
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
author_facet Barel-Ben David, Yael
Garty, Erez S.
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
author_sort Barel-Ben David, Yael
collection PubMed
description In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write for news media about science. On these general news platforms, scientists' stories would have to compete for attention with other news stories on hard (e.g. politics) and entertaining (e.g. celebrity news) topics written by professional writers. Do they stand a chance? This study aimed to quantitatively characterize audience interactions as an indicator of interest in science news stories authored by early career scientists (henceforth ‘scientists’) trained to function as science reporters, as compared to news items written by reporters and published in the same news outlets. To measure users' behavior, we collected data on the number of clicks, likes, comments and average time spent on page. The sample was composed of 150 science items written by 50 scientists trained to contribute popular science stories in the Davidson Institute of Science Education reporters’ program and published on two major Israeli news websites—Mako and Ynet between July 2015 to January 2018. Each science item was paired with another item written by the website’s organic reporter, and published on the same channel as the science story (e.g., tourism, health) and the same close time. Overall significant differences were not found in the public's engagement with the different items. Although, on one website there was a significant difference on two out of four engagement types, the second website did not have any difference, e.g., people did not click, like or comment more on items written by organic reporters than on the stories written by scientists. This creates an optimistic starting point for filling the science news void by scientists as science reporters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6948730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69487302020-01-17 Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists Barel-Ben David, Yael Garty, Erez S. Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet PLoS One Research Article In many countries the public's main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write for news media about science. On these general news platforms, scientists' stories would have to compete for attention with other news stories on hard (e.g. politics) and entertaining (e.g. celebrity news) topics written by professional writers. Do they stand a chance? This study aimed to quantitatively characterize audience interactions as an indicator of interest in science news stories authored by early career scientists (henceforth ‘scientists’) trained to function as science reporters, as compared to news items written by reporters and published in the same news outlets. To measure users' behavior, we collected data on the number of clicks, likes, comments and average time spent on page. The sample was composed of 150 science items written by 50 scientists trained to contribute popular science stories in the Davidson Institute of Science Education reporters’ program and published on two major Israeli news websites—Mako and Ynet between July 2015 to January 2018. Each science item was paired with another item written by the website’s organic reporter, and published on the same channel as the science story (e.g., tourism, health) and the same close time. Overall significant differences were not found in the public's engagement with the different items. Although, on one website there was a significant difference on two out of four engagement types, the second website did not have any difference, e.g., people did not click, like or comment more on items written by organic reporters than on the stories written by scientists. This creates an optimistic starting point for filling the science news void by scientists as science reporters. Public Library of Science 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6948730/ /pubmed/31914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250 Text en © 2020 Barel-Ben David et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barel-Ben David, Yael
Garty, Erez S.
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title_full Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title_fullStr Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title_full_unstemmed Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title_short Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
title_sort can scientists fill the science journalism void? online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6948730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250
work_keys_str_mv AT barelbendavidyael canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists
AT gartyerezs canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists
AT baramtsabariayelet canscientistsfillthesciencejournalismvoidonlinepublicengagementwithsciencestoriesauthoredbyscientists