Cargando…

Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma

The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schieferdecker, Aneta, Hörber, Sebastian, Ums, Monika, Besemer, Britta, Bokemeyer, Carsten, Peter, Andreas, Weisel, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8
_version_ 1783485878841114624
author Schieferdecker, Aneta
Hörber, Sebastian
Ums, Monika
Besemer, Britta
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Peter, Andreas
Weisel, Katja
author_facet Schieferdecker, Aneta
Hörber, Sebastian
Ums, Monika
Besemer, Britta
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Peter, Andreas
Weisel, Katja
author_sort Schieferdecker, Aneta
collection PubMed
description The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6949235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69492352020-01-13 Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma Schieferdecker, Aneta Hörber, Sebastian Ums, Monika Besemer, Britta Bokemeyer, Carsten Peter, Andreas Weisel, Katja Blood Cancer J Article The measurement of serum-free light chains (FLC) is standard of care in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma (MM). The revised international myeloma working group (IMWG) implemented the involved FLC/noninvolved FLC (iFLC/niFLC) ratio as a biomarker for MM requiring treatment. Recently, a new definition of high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) including iFLC/niFLC ratio was published. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay). Today, two additional assays, N Latex FLC and ELISA-based Sebia FLC, are available. Here, we report on a single-center-study comparing results of all three different assays for FLC correlation and its potential implications for diagnostic and clinical use. In total, 187 samples from 47 MM patients were examined, and determination of FLC was performed. Comparison analyses showed similar FLC results for Sebia FLC and N Latex FLC assay with markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite. Values of λ FLC exhibited high variability. The ratio of iFLC/niFLC showed significant discrepancies among these assays. Our data demonstrate that the three available assays may result in markedly discrepant results, and should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients. Furthermore, modifications of the assay-specific diagnostic (iFLC/niFLC) thresholds for SMM and MM are recommended. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6949235/ /pubmed/31915365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Schieferdecker, Aneta
Hörber, Sebastian
Ums, Monika
Besemer, Britta
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Peter, Andreas
Weisel, Katja
Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title_full Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title_short Comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
title_sort comparison of three different serum-free light-chain assays—implications on diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring of multiple myeloma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0267-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schieferdeckeraneta comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT horbersebastian comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT umsmonika comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT besemerbritta comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT bokemeyercarsten comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT peterandreas comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma
AT weiselkatja comparisonofthreedifferentserumfreelightchainassaysimplicationsondiagnosticandtherapeuticmonitoringofmultiplemyeloma