Cargando…

A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci

Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, John M., Cuadra, Giancarlo A., Palazzolo, Dominic L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004
_version_ 1783485949139746816
author Nelson, John M.
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
author_facet Nelson, John M.
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
author_sort Nelson, John M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liquid contains fewer constituents than smoke, we hypothesize that growth media containing E-liquid or aerosol has less impact on oral commensal streptococci than cigarette smoke. Methods: Eight-hour growth curves were generated for three strains of streptococci following exposure of growth media to nicotine alone (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/mL), E-liquid ± nicotine (2.3, 4.7, 7.0 µL/mL), ECIG-generated aerosol ± nicotine (25, 50, 75 puffs), or cigarette smoke (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 puffs). Nicotine and E-liquid were added to the media at concentrations equivalent to vaporized amounts of 25, 50, or 75 puffs. Absorbance readings were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of bacterial growth. Results: Both E-liquid and aerosol (±nicotine) had little to no effect on eight-hour streptococcal growth. In contrast, five puffs of smoke inhibited streptococcal growth. Conclusions: Smoke-treated growth media, but not E-liquid or ECIG-generated aerosol, inhibits the growth of oral commensal streptococci. A possible implication is that aerosol may induce less periodontitis than smoke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6949915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69499152020-01-16 A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci Nelson, John M. Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liquid contains fewer constituents than smoke, we hypothesize that growth media containing E-liquid or aerosol has less impact on oral commensal streptococci than cigarette smoke. Methods: Eight-hour growth curves were generated for three strains of streptococci following exposure of growth media to nicotine alone (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/mL), E-liquid ± nicotine (2.3, 4.7, 7.0 µL/mL), ECIG-generated aerosol ± nicotine (25, 50, 75 puffs), or cigarette smoke (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 puffs). Nicotine and E-liquid were added to the media at concentrations equivalent to vaporized amounts of 25, 50, or 75 puffs. Absorbance readings were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of bacterial growth. Results: Both E-liquid and aerosol (±nicotine) had little to no effect on eight-hour streptococcal growth. In contrast, five puffs of smoke inhibited streptococcal growth. Conclusions: Smoke-treated growth media, but not E-liquid or ECIG-generated aerosol, inhibits the growth of oral commensal streptococci. A possible implication is that aerosol may induce less periodontitis than smoke. MDPI 2019-12-09 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6949915/ /pubmed/31835369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nelson, John M.
Cuadra, Giancarlo A.
Palazzolo, Dominic L.
A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_full A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_fullStr A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_short A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
title_sort comparison of flavorless electronic cigarette-generated aerosol and conventional cigarette smoke on the planktonic growth of common oral commensal streptococci
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonjohnm acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT cuadragiancarloa acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT palazzolodominicl acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT nelsonjohnm comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT cuadragiancarloa comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci
AT palazzolodominicl comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci