Cargando…
A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci
Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liq...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004 |
_version_ | 1783485949139746816 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, John M. Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. |
author_facet | Nelson, John M. Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. |
author_sort | Nelson, John M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liquid contains fewer constituents than smoke, we hypothesize that growth media containing E-liquid or aerosol has less impact on oral commensal streptococci than cigarette smoke. Methods: Eight-hour growth curves were generated for three strains of streptococci following exposure of growth media to nicotine alone (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/mL), E-liquid ± nicotine (2.3, 4.7, 7.0 µL/mL), ECIG-generated aerosol ± nicotine (25, 50, 75 puffs), or cigarette smoke (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 puffs). Nicotine and E-liquid were added to the media at concentrations equivalent to vaporized amounts of 25, 50, or 75 puffs. Absorbance readings were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of bacterial growth. Results: Both E-liquid and aerosol (±nicotine) had little to no effect on eight-hour streptococcal growth. In contrast, five puffs of smoke inhibited streptococcal growth. Conclusions: Smoke-treated growth media, but not E-liquid or ECIG-generated aerosol, inhibits the growth of oral commensal streptococci. A possible implication is that aerosol may induce less periodontitis than smoke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6949915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69499152020-01-16 A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci Nelson, John M. Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Smoking is the number one predictor for the development of periodontal disease. Consequently, electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has prompted investigations into the health-related risks induced by ECIG-generated aerosol on oral commensal bacteria as compared to cigarette smoke. Since E-liquid contains fewer constituents than smoke, we hypothesize that growth media containing E-liquid or aerosol has less impact on oral commensal streptococci than cigarette smoke. Methods: Eight-hour growth curves were generated for three strains of streptococci following exposure of growth media to nicotine alone (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/mL), E-liquid ± nicotine (2.3, 4.7, 7.0 µL/mL), ECIG-generated aerosol ± nicotine (25, 50, 75 puffs), or cigarette smoke (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75 puffs). Nicotine and E-liquid were added to the media at concentrations equivalent to vaporized amounts of 25, 50, or 75 puffs. Absorbance readings were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h of bacterial growth. Results: Both E-liquid and aerosol (±nicotine) had little to no effect on eight-hour streptococcal growth. In contrast, five puffs of smoke inhibited streptococcal growth. Conclusions: Smoke-treated growth media, but not E-liquid or ECIG-generated aerosol, inhibits the growth of oral commensal streptococci. A possible implication is that aerosol may induce less periodontitis than smoke. MDPI 2019-12-09 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6949915/ /pubmed/31835369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nelson, John M. Cuadra, Giancarlo A. Palazzolo, Dominic L. A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title | A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title_full | A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title_short | A Comparison of Flavorless Electronic Cigarette-Generated Aerosol and Conventional Cigarette Smoke on the Planktonic Growth of Common Oral Commensal Streptococci |
title_sort | comparison of flavorless electronic cigarette-generated aerosol and conventional cigarette smoke on the planktonic growth of common oral commensal streptococci |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6949915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonjohnm acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci AT cuadragiancarloa acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci AT palazzolodominicl acomparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci AT nelsonjohnm comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci AT cuadragiancarloa comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci AT palazzolodominicl comparisonofflavorlesselectroniccigarettegeneratedaerosolandconventionalcigarettesmokeontheplanktonicgrowthofcommonoralcommensalstreptococci |