Cargando…

Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments

BACKGROUND: The assembly of animal microbiomes is influenced by multiple environmental factors and host genetics, although the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. Bifidobacteria (genus Bifidobacterium, phylum Actinobacteria) are common first colonizers of gut microbiomes in humans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez, Cynthia I., Martiny, Jennifer B. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6435-1
_version_ 1783486154554736640
author Rodriguez, Cynthia I.
Martiny, Jennifer B. H.
author_facet Rodriguez, Cynthia I.
Martiny, Jennifer B. H.
author_sort Rodriguez, Cynthia I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assembly of animal microbiomes is influenced by multiple environmental factors and host genetics, although the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. Bifidobacteria (genus Bifidobacterium, phylum Actinobacteria) are common first colonizers of gut microbiomes in humans and inhabit other mammals, social insects, food, and sewages. In humans, the presence of bifidobacteria in the gut has been correlated with health-promoting benefits. Here, we compared the genome sequences of a subset of the over 400 Bifidobacterium strains publicly available to investigate the adaptation of bifidobacteria diversity. We tested 1) whether bifidobacteria show a phylogenetic signal with their isolation sources (hosts and environments) and 2) whether key traits encoded by the bifidobacteria genomes depend on the host or environment from which they were isolated. We analyzed Bifidobacterium genomes available in the PATRIC and NCBI repositories and identified the hosts and/or environment from which they were isolated. A multilocus phylogenetic analysis was conducted to compare the genetic relatedness the strains harbored by different hosts and environments. Furthermore, we examined differences in genomic traits and genes related to amino acid biosynthesis and degradation of carbohydrates. RESULTS: We found that bifidobacteria diversity appears to have evolved with their hosts as strains isolated from the same host were non-randomly associated with their phylogenetic relatedness. Moreover, bifidobacteria isolated from different sources displayed differences in genomic traits such as genome size and accessory gene composition and on particular traits related to amino acid production and degradation of carbohydrates. In contrast, when analyzing diversity within human-derived bifidobacteria, we observed no phylogenetic signal or differences on specific traits (amino acid biosynthesis genes and CAZymes). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study shows that bifidobacteria diversity is strongly adapted to specific hosts and environments and that several genomic traits were associated with their isolation sources. However, this signal is not observed in human-derived strains alone. Looking into the genomic signatures of bifidobacteria strains in different environments can give insights into how this bacterial group adapts to their environment and what types of traits are important for these adaptations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69507982020-01-09 Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments Rodriguez, Cynthia I. Martiny, Jennifer B. H. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The assembly of animal microbiomes is influenced by multiple environmental factors and host genetics, although the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. Bifidobacteria (genus Bifidobacterium, phylum Actinobacteria) are common first colonizers of gut microbiomes in humans and inhabit other mammals, social insects, food, and sewages. In humans, the presence of bifidobacteria in the gut has been correlated with health-promoting benefits. Here, we compared the genome sequences of a subset of the over 400 Bifidobacterium strains publicly available to investigate the adaptation of bifidobacteria diversity. We tested 1) whether bifidobacteria show a phylogenetic signal with their isolation sources (hosts and environments) and 2) whether key traits encoded by the bifidobacteria genomes depend on the host or environment from which they were isolated. We analyzed Bifidobacterium genomes available in the PATRIC and NCBI repositories and identified the hosts and/or environment from which they were isolated. A multilocus phylogenetic analysis was conducted to compare the genetic relatedness the strains harbored by different hosts and environments. Furthermore, we examined differences in genomic traits and genes related to amino acid biosynthesis and degradation of carbohydrates. RESULTS: We found that bifidobacteria diversity appears to have evolved with their hosts as strains isolated from the same host were non-randomly associated with their phylogenetic relatedness. Moreover, bifidobacteria isolated from different sources displayed differences in genomic traits such as genome size and accessory gene composition and on particular traits related to amino acid production and degradation of carbohydrates. In contrast, when analyzing diversity within human-derived bifidobacteria, we observed no phylogenetic signal or differences on specific traits (amino acid biosynthesis genes and CAZymes). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study shows that bifidobacteria diversity is strongly adapted to specific hosts and environments and that several genomic traits were associated with their isolation sources. However, this signal is not observed in human-derived strains alone. Looking into the genomic signatures of bifidobacteria strains in different environments can give insights into how this bacterial group adapts to their environment and what types of traits are important for these adaptations. BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950798/ /pubmed/31914919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6435-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodriguez, Cynthia I.
Martiny, Jennifer B. H.
Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title_full Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title_fullStr Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title_short Evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
title_sort evolutionary relationships among bifidobacteria and their hosts and environments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6435-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezcynthiai evolutionaryrelationshipsamongbifidobacteriaandtheirhostsandenvironments
AT martinyjenniferbh evolutionaryrelationshipsamongbifidobacteriaandtheirhostsandenvironments