Cargando…
Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects
BACKGROUND: Digital Pills (DP) are an innovative drug-device technology that permits to combine traditional medications with a monitoring system that automatically records data about medication adherence as well as patients’ physiological data. Although DP are a promising innovation in the field of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1 |
_version_ | 1783486160340779008 |
---|---|
author | Martani, Andrea Geneviève, Lester Darryl Poppe, Christopher Casonato, Carlo Wangmo, Tenzin |
author_facet | Martani, Andrea Geneviève, Lester Darryl Poppe, Christopher Casonato, Carlo Wangmo, Tenzin |
author_sort | Martani, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital Pills (DP) are an innovative drug-device technology that permits to combine traditional medications with a monitoring system that automatically records data about medication adherence as well as patients’ physiological data. Although DP are a promising innovation in the field of digital medicine, their use has also raised a number of ethical concerns. These ethical concerns, however, have been expressed principally from a theoretical perspective, whereas an ethical analysis with a more empirically oriented approach is lacking. There is also a lack of clarity about the empirical evidence available concerning the application of this innovative digital medicine. METHODS: To map the studies where DP have been tested on patients and discuss the ethically relevant issues evident therein, we performed a scoping review of the empirical literature concerning DP. RESULTS: Our search allowed us to identify 18 papers reporting on studies where DP were tested on patients. These included studies with different designs and involving patients with a variety of conditions. In the empirical literature, a number of issues with ethical relevance were evident. At the patient level, the ethical issues include users’ interaction with DP, personal sphere, health-related risks and patients’ benefits. At the provider level, ethically relevant issues touch upon the doctor-patient relationship and the question of data access. At the societal level, they concern the benefits to society, the quality of evidence and the dichotomy device-medicine. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that evidence concerning DP is not robust and that more research should be performed and study results made available to evaluate this digital medicine. Moreover, our analysis of the ethically relevant aspects within empirical literature underscores that there are concrete and specific open questions that should be tackled in the ethical discussion about this new technological solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6950823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69508232020-01-09 Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects Martani, Andrea Geneviève, Lester Darryl Poppe, Christopher Casonato, Carlo Wangmo, Tenzin BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Digital Pills (DP) are an innovative drug-device technology that permits to combine traditional medications with a monitoring system that automatically records data about medication adherence as well as patients’ physiological data. Although DP are a promising innovation in the field of digital medicine, their use has also raised a number of ethical concerns. These ethical concerns, however, have been expressed principally from a theoretical perspective, whereas an ethical analysis with a more empirically oriented approach is lacking. There is also a lack of clarity about the empirical evidence available concerning the application of this innovative digital medicine. METHODS: To map the studies where DP have been tested on patients and discuss the ethically relevant issues evident therein, we performed a scoping review of the empirical literature concerning DP. RESULTS: Our search allowed us to identify 18 papers reporting on studies where DP were tested on patients. These included studies with different designs and involving patients with a variety of conditions. In the empirical literature, a number of issues with ethical relevance were evident. At the patient level, the ethical issues include users’ interaction with DP, personal sphere, health-related risks and patients’ benefits. At the provider level, ethically relevant issues touch upon the doctor-patient relationship and the question of data access. At the societal level, they concern the benefits to society, the quality of evidence and the dichotomy device-medicine. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that evidence concerning DP is not robust and that more research should be performed and study results made available to evaluate this digital medicine. Moreover, our analysis of the ethically relevant aspects within empirical literature underscores that there are concrete and specific open questions that should be tackled in the ethical discussion about this new technological solution. BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950823/ /pubmed/31914995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martani, Andrea Geneviève, Lester Darryl Poppe, Christopher Casonato, Carlo Wangmo, Tenzin Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title | Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title_full | Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title_fullStr | Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title_short | Digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
title_sort | digital pills: a scoping review of the empirical literature and analysis of the ethical aspects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0443-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martaniandrea digitalpillsascopingreviewoftheempiricalliteratureandanalysisoftheethicalaspects AT genevievelesterdarryl digitalpillsascopingreviewoftheempiricalliteratureandanalysisoftheethicalaspects AT poppechristopher digitalpillsascopingreviewoftheempiricalliteratureandanalysisoftheethicalaspects AT casonatocarlo digitalpillsascopingreviewoftheempiricalliteratureandanalysisoftheethicalaspects AT wangmotenzin digitalpillsascopingreviewoftheempiricalliteratureandanalysisoftheethicalaspects |