Cargando…

Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of canine retraction, mesial movement of molar and pain perception in maxillary first premolar extraction patients with or without flapless cortical perforations (FCPs). METHODS: Thirty adult patients with class II div I malocclusion were randomly allocated with the h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kundi, Ibadullah, Alam, Mohammad Khursheed, Shaheed, Sohrab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.009
_version_ 1783486162899304448
author Kundi, Ibadullah
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Shaheed, Sohrab
author_facet Kundi, Ibadullah
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Shaheed, Sohrab
author_sort Kundi, Ibadullah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of canine retraction, mesial movement of molar and pain perception in maxillary first premolar extraction patients with or without flapless cortical perforations (FCPs). METHODS: Thirty adult patients with class II div I malocclusion were randomly allocated with the help of SPSS software to either perforation or conventional group for carrying out this randomized parallel group-controlled trial in 1:1 ratio. Maxillary first premolars were extracted and after canine retraction, distance between the tip of the canine and midpoint of incisal edge and the distance between the cervical midpoints on the height of contour of respective cinguli was measured. Also, mesial movement of molar and pain perception were assessed in both groups. Three bilateral cortical FCP of 1.5 mm diameter were made in the perforation group. Data were analyzed with the help of SPSS software with an intention-to-treat the FCP approach. RESULTS: Significant canine retraction in patients with FCP (mean retraction of 6.68 ± 0.60 [measured at crown tip level] and 5.97 ± 0.71 mm [measured at mid cervical level]) was revealed, while patients with conventional mechanics had mean retraction of 2.54 ± 0.49 and 2.33 ± 0.46 mm. Mesial movement of molar also showed significant difference (FCP = 0.48 ± 0.11 mm and Conventional = 0.65 ± 0.19 mm). Pain perception in control group was significantly lower in day 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: FCPs are an effective method of accelerating the rate of canine retractions by 2–3 fold of tooth movement, however, pain perception was high in day 1 and 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69508362020-01-09 Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction Kundi, Ibadullah Alam, Mohammad Khursheed Shaheed, Sohrab Saudi Dent J Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of canine retraction, mesial movement of molar and pain perception in maxillary first premolar extraction patients with or without flapless cortical perforations (FCPs). METHODS: Thirty adult patients with class II div I malocclusion were randomly allocated with the help of SPSS software to either perforation or conventional group for carrying out this randomized parallel group-controlled trial in 1:1 ratio. Maxillary first premolars were extracted and after canine retraction, distance between the tip of the canine and midpoint of incisal edge and the distance between the cervical midpoints on the height of contour of respective cinguli was measured. Also, mesial movement of molar and pain perception were assessed in both groups. Three bilateral cortical FCP of 1.5 mm diameter were made in the perforation group. Data were analyzed with the help of SPSS software with an intention-to-treat the FCP approach. RESULTS: Significant canine retraction in patients with FCP (mean retraction of 6.68 ± 0.60 [measured at crown tip level] and 5.97 ± 0.71 mm [measured at mid cervical level]) was revealed, while patients with conventional mechanics had mean retraction of 2.54 ± 0.49 and 2.33 ± 0.46 mm. Mesial movement of molar also showed significant difference (FCP = 0.48 ± 0.11 mm and Conventional = 0.65 ± 0.19 mm). Pain perception in control group was significantly lower in day 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: FCPs are an effective method of accelerating the rate of canine retractions by 2–3 fold of tooth movement, however, pain perception was high in day 1 and 2. Elsevier 2020-01 2019-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6950836/ /pubmed/31920274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.009 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kundi, Ibadullah
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Shaheed, Sohrab
Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title_full Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title_fullStr Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title_full_unstemmed Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title_short Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
title_sort micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.009
work_keys_str_mv AT kundiibadullah microosteoperforationeffectsasaninterventiononcanineretraction
AT alammohammadkhursheed microosteoperforationeffectsasaninterventiononcanineretraction
AT shaheedsohrab microosteoperforationeffectsasaninterventiononcanineretraction