Cargando…

Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of patients with time-critical and life-threatening illness represents a cognitive challenge for emergency room (ER) clinicians. We designed a cognitive aid, the Emergency Protocols Handbook, to simplify clinical management and team processes. Resuscitation guidelines were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Charlotte, Robertson, Dean, Rolfe, Margaret, Pascoe, Sharene, Passey, Megan E., Pit, Sabrina Winona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0441-x
_version_ 1783486166084878336
author Hall, Charlotte
Robertson, Dean
Rolfe, Margaret
Pascoe, Sharene
Passey, Megan E.
Pit, Sabrina Winona
author_facet Hall, Charlotte
Robertson, Dean
Rolfe, Margaret
Pascoe, Sharene
Passey, Megan E.
Pit, Sabrina Winona
author_sort Hall, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of patients with time-critical and life-threatening illness represents a cognitive challenge for emergency room (ER) clinicians. We designed a cognitive aid, the Emergency Protocols Handbook, to simplify clinical management and team processes. Resuscitation guidelines were reformatted into simple, single step-by-step pathways. This Australian randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of this cognitive aid in a simulated ER environment by observing team error rates when current resuscitation guidelines were followed, with and without the handbook. METHODS: Resuscitation teams were randomised to manage two scenarios with the handbook and two without in a high-fidelity simulation centre. Each scenario was video-recorded. The primary outcome measure was error rates (the number of errors made out of 15 key tasks per scenario). Key tasks varied by scenario. Each team completed four scenarios and was measured on 60 key tasks. Participants were surveyed regarding their perception of the usefulness of the handbook. RESULTS: Twenty-one groups performed 84 ER crisis simulations. The unadjusted error rate in the handbook group was 18.8% (121/645) versus 38.9% (239/615) in the non-handbook group. There was a statistically significant reduction of 54.0% (95% CI 49.9–57.9) in the estimated percentage error rate when the handbook was available across all scenarios 17.9% (95% CI 14.4–22.0%) versus 38.9% (95% CI 34.2–43.9%). Almost all (97%) participants said they would want to use this cognitive aid during a real medical crisis situation. CONCLUSION: This trial showed that by following the step-by-step, linear pathways in the handbook, clinicians more than halved their teams’ rate of error, across four simulated medical crises. The handbook improves team performance and enables healthcare teams to reduce clinical error rates and thus reduce harm for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001456448 registered: www.anzctr.org.au. Trial site: http://emergencyprotocols.org.au/
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69508522020-01-09 Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia Hall, Charlotte Robertson, Dean Rolfe, Margaret Pascoe, Sharene Passey, Megan E. Pit, Sabrina Winona Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of patients with time-critical and life-threatening illness represents a cognitive challenge for emergency room (ER) clinicians. We designed a cognitive aid, the Emergency Protocols Handbook, to simplify clinical management and team processes. Resuscitation guidelines were reformatted into simple, single step-by-step pathways. This Australian randomised controlled trial tested the effectiveness of this cognitive aid in a simulated ER environment by observing team error rates when current resuscitation guidelines were followed, with and without the handbook. METHODS: Resuscitation teams were randomised to manage two scenarios with the handbook and two without in a high-fidelity simulation centre. Each scenario was video-recorded. The primary outcome measure was error rates (the number of errors made out of 15 key tasks per scenario). Key tasks varied by scenario. Each team completed four scenarios and was measured on 60 key tasks. Participants were surveyed regarding their perception of the usefulness of the handbook. RESULTS: Twenty-one groups performed 84 ER crisis simulations. The unadjusted error rate in the handbook group was 18.8% (121/645) versus 38.9% (239/615) in the non-handbook group. There was a statistically significant reduction of 54.0% (95% CI 49.9–57.9) in the estimated percentage error rate when the handbook was available across all scenarios 17.9% (95% CI 14.4–22.0%) versus 38.9% (95% CI 34.2–43.9%). Almost all (97%) participants said they would want to use this cognitive aid during a real medical crisis situation. CONCLUSION: This trial showed that by following the step-by-step, linear pathways in the handbook, clinicians more than halved their teams’ rate of error, across four simulated medical crises. The handbook improves team performance and enables healthcare teams to reduce clinical error rates and thus reduce harm for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001456448 registered: www.anzctr.org.au. Trial site: http://emergencyprotocols.org.au/ BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950852/ /pubmed/31915029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0441-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hall, Charlotte
Robertson, Dean
Rolfe, Margaret
Pascoe, Sharene
Passey, Megan E.
Pit, Sabrina Winona
Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title_full Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title_fullStr Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title_short Do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? Trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (TEMPIST) in Australia
title_sort do cognitive aids reduce error rates in resuscitation team performance? trial of emergency medicine protocols in simulation training (tempist) in australia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0441-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hallcharlotte docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia
AT robertsondean docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia
AT rolfemargaret docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia
AT pascoesharene docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia
AT passeymegane docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia
AT pitsabrinawinona docognitiveaidsreduceerrorratesinresuscitationteamperformancetrialofemergencymedicineprotocolsinsimulationtrainingtempistinaustralia