Cargando…
Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5 |
_version_ | 1783486172934176768 |
---|---|
author | Levesque, Jean-Frederic Sutherland, Kim |
author_facet | Levesque, Jean-Frederic Sutherland, Kim |
author_sort | Levesque, Jean-Frederic |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach. Their aim is to bring clarity to performance assessment, using relevant and robust concepts – and avoiding reductionist measures – to build a whole-of-system view of performance. Existing performance frameworks are not fully aligned with these developments. METHODS: An eight stage process to develop a conceptual framework incorporated literature review, mapping, categorisation, integration, synthesis and validation of performance constructs that have been used by organisations and researchers in order to assess, reflect and report on healthcare performance. RESULTS: A total of 19 performance frameworks were identified and included in the review. Existing frameworks mostly adopted either a logic model (inputs, outputs and outcomes), a functional, or a goal-achievement approach. The mapping process identified 110 performance terms and concepts. These were integrated, synthesised and resynthesised to produce a framework that features 12 derived constructs reflecting combinations of patients’ needs and expectations; healthcare resources and structures; receipt and experience of healthcare services; healthcare processes, functions and context; and healthcare outcomes. The 12 constructs gauge performance in terms of coverage, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, productivity, efficiency, impact, sustainability, resilience, adaptability and equity. They reflect four performance perspectives (patient, population, delivery organisation and system). CONCLUSIONS: Internationally, healthcare systems and researchers have used a variety of terms to categorise indicators of healthcare performance, however few frameworks are based on a theoretically-based conceptual underpinning. The proposed framework incorporates a manageable number of performance domains that together provide a comprehensive assessment, as well as conceptual and operational clarity and coherence that support multifaceted measurement systems for healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6950882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69508822020-01-09 Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework Levesque, Jean-Frederic Sutherland, Kim BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach. Their aim is to bring clarity to performance assessment, using relevant and robust concepts – and avoiding reductionist measures – to build a whole-of-system view of performance. Existing performance frameworks are not fully aligned with these developments. METHODS: An eight stage process to develop a conceptual framework incorporated literature review, mapping, categorisation, integration, synthesis and validation of performance constructs that have been used by organisations and researchers in order to assess, reflect and report on healthcare performance. RESULTS: A total of 19 performance frameworks were identified and included in the review. Existing frameworks mostly adopted either a logic model (inputs, outputs and outcomes), a functional, or a goal-achievement approach. The mapping process identified 110 performance terms and concepts. These were integrated, synthesised and resynthesised to produce a framework that features 12 derived constructs reflecting combinations of patients’ needs and expectations; healthcare resources and structures; receipt and experience of healthcare services; healthcare processes, functions and context; and healthcare outcomes. The 12 constructs gauge performance in terms of coverage, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, productivity, efficiency, impact, sustainability, resilience, adaptability and equity. They reflect four performance perspectives (patient, population, delivery organisation and system). CONCLUSIONS: Internationally, healthcare systems and researchers have used a variety of terms to categorise indicators of healthcare performance, however few frameworks are based on a theoretically-based conceptual underpinning. The proposed framework incorporates a manageable number of performance domains that together provide a comprehensive assessment, as well as conceptual and operational clarity and coherence that support multifaceted measurement systems for healthcare. BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950882/ /pubmed/31915001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Levesque, Jean-Frederic Sutherland, Kim Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title | Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title_full | Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title_fullStr | Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title_short | Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
title_sort | combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levesquejeanfrederic combiningpatientclinicalandsystemperspectivesinassessingperformanceinhealthcareanintegratedmeasurementframework AT sutherlandkim combiningpatientclinicalandsystemperspectivesinassessingperformanceinhealthcareanintegratedmeasurementframework |