Cargando…

Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework

BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levesque, Jean-Frederic, Sutherland, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5
_version_ 1783486172934176768
author Levesque, Jean-Frederic
Sutherland, Kim
author_facet Levesque, Jean-Frederic
Sutherland, Kim
author_sort Levesque, Jean-Frederic
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach. Their aim is to bring clarity to performance assessment, using relevant and robust concepts – and avoiding reductionist measures – to build a whole-of-system view of performance. Existing performance frameworks are not fully aligned with these developments. METHODS: An eight stage process to develop a conceptual framework incorporated literature review, mapping, categorisation, integration, synthesis and validation of performance constructs that have been used by organisations and researchers in order to assess, reflect and report on healthcare performance. RESULTS: A total of 19 performance frameworks were identified and included in the review. Existing frameworks mostly adopted either a logic model (inputs, outputs and outcomes), a functional, or a goal-achievement approach. The mapping process identified 110 performance terms and concepts. These were integrated, synthesised and resynthesised to produce a framework that features 12 derived constructs reflecting combinations of patients’ needs and expectations; healthcare resources and structures; receipt and experience of healthcare services; healthcare processes, functions and context; and healthcare outcomes. The 12 constructs gauge performance in terms of coverage, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, productivity, efficiency, impact, sustainability, resilience, adaptability and equity. They reflect four performance perspectives (patient, population, delivery organisation and system). CONCLUSIONS: Internationally, healthcare systems and researchers have used a variety of terms to categorise indicators of healthcare performance, however few frameworks are based on a theoretically-based conceptual underpinning. The proposed framework incorporates a manageable number of performance domains that together provide a comprehensive assessment, as well as conceptual and operational clarity and coherence that support multifaceted measurement systems for healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69508822020-01-09 Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework Levesque, Jean-Frederic Sutherland, Kim BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The science of measuring and reporting on the performance of healthcare systems is rapidly evolving. In the past decade, across many jurisdictions, organisations tasked with monitoring progress towards reform targets have broadened their purview to take a more system-functioning approach. Their aim is to bring clarity to performance assessment, using relevant and robust concepts – and avoiding reductionist measures – to build a whole-of-system view of performance. Existing performance frameworks are not fully aligned with these developments. METHODS: An eight stage process to develop a conceptual framework incorporated literature review, mapping, categorisation, integration, synthesis and validation of performance constructs that have been used by organisations and researchers in order to assess, reflect and report on healthcare performance. RESULTS: A total of 19 performance frameworks were identified and included in the review. Existing frameworks mostly adopted either a logic model (inputs, outputs and outcomes), a functional, or a goal-achievement approach. The mapping process identified 110 performance terms and concepts. These were integrated, synthesised and resynthesised to produce a framework that features 12 derived constructs reflecting combinations of patients’ needs and expectations; healthcare resources and structures; receipt and experience of healthcare services; healthcare processes, functions and context; and healthcare outcomes. The 12 constructs gauge performance in terms of coverage, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, productivity, efficiency, impact, sustainability, resilience, adaptability and equity. They reflect four performance perspectives (patient, population, delivery organisation and system). CONCLUSIONS: Internationally, healthcare systems and researchers have used a variety of terms to categorise indicators of healthcare performance, however few frameworks are based on a theoretically-based conceptual underpinning. The proposed framework incorporates a manageable number of performance domains that together provide a comprehensive assessment, as well as conceptual and operational clarity and coherence that support multifaceted measurement systems for healthcare. BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950882/ /pubmed/31915001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Levesque, Jean-Frederic
Sutherland, Kim
Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title_full Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title_fullStr Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title_full_unstemmed Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title_short Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
title_sort combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5
work_keys_str_mv AT levesquejeanfrederic combiningpatientclinicalandsystemperspectivesinassessingperformanceinhealthcareanintegratedmeasurementframework
AT sutherlandkim combiningpatientclinicalandsystemperspectivesinassessingperformanceinhealthcareanintegratedmeasurementframework