Cargando…

On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal

BACKGROUND: We describe an on-site clinical mentoring program aimed at improving emergency obstetrical and new-born care (EmONC) in Nepal and assess its effectiveness on nurses’ knowledge and skills. In Nepal, both the maternal mortality ratio (MMR, 239/100,000 live births) and the neonatal mortalit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyet, Sophie, Rajbhandari, Swaraj, Alvarez, Valerie Broch, Bayou, Aida, Khanal, Sirjana, Pokhrel, Tara Nath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0396-1
_version_ 1783486178110996480
author Goyet, Sophie
Rajbhandari, Swaraj
Alvarez, Valerie Broch
Bayou, Aida
Khanal, Sirjana
Pokhrel, Tara Nath
author_facet Goyet, Sophie
Rajbhandari, Swaraj
Alvarez, Valerie Broch
Bayou, Aida
Khanal, Sirjana
Pokhrel, Tara Nath
author_sort Goyet, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We describe an on-site clinical mentoring program aimed at improving emergency obstetrical and new-born care (EmONC) in Nepal and assess its effectiveness on nurses’ knowledge and skills. In Nepal, both the maternal mortality ratio (MMR, 239/100,000 live births) and the neonatal mortality rate (NMR, 21/1000 live births) were among the highest in the world in 2016, despite impressive progress over recent decades considering the challenging environment. METHODS: From September 2016 to April 2018, three experienced nurses conducted repeated mentoring visits in 61 comprehensive or basic EmONC centers and birthing centers located in 4 provinces of Nepal. Using updated national training manuals and teaching aids, these clinical mentors assessed and taught 12 core EmONC clinical skills to their nurse-mentees. Clinical mentors worked with management mentors whose goal was to improve the nurses’ working environment. We assessed whether the cohort of nurse-mentees performed better as a group and individually performed better at the end of the program than at baseline using relevant tests (chi-square test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-population rank test). RESULTS: In total, 308 nurses were assessed, including 96 (31.2%), 77 (25.0%) and 135 (43.8%) who participated in all three, two or only one mentoring session, respectively. In total, 225 (73.0%) worked as auxiliary nurse-midwives (ANMs), while 69 (22.4%) worked as nurses. One hundred and ninety five (63.3%) were trained as skilled birth attendants, of which 45 (23.1%) were nurses, 141 (72.3%) were auxiliaries and 9 (4.6%) had other positions. The proportion of ANMs and nurse-mentees who obtained a knowledge assessment score ≥ 85% increased from 57.8 to 86.1% (p <  0.001). Clinical assessment scores increased significantly for each participant, and therefore for the group. SBA-trained mentees had better knowledge of maternal and new-born care and were better able to perform the 12 core clinical skills throughout the program. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that on-site clinical mentoring of nurses coupled with health facility management mentoring can improve nurses’ clinical competences in and performance of maternity and new-born care. Assessing evidence of impact on patient safety would be the next stage in evaluating this promising intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69509042020-01-09 On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal Goyet, Sophie Rajbhandari, Swaraj Alvarez, Valerie Broch Bayou, Aida Khanal, Sirjana Pokhrel, Tara Nath BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: We describe an on-site clinical mentoring program aimed at improving emergency obstetrical and new-born care (EmONC) in Nepal and assess its effectiveness on nurses’ knowledge and skills. In Nepal, both the maternal mortality ratio (MMR, 239/100,000 live births) and the neonatal mortality rate (NMR, 21/1000 live births) were among the highest in the world in 2016, despite impressive progress over recent decades considering the challenging environment. METHODS: From September 2016 to April 2018, three experienced nurses conducted repeated mentoring visits in 61 comprehensive or basic EmONC centers and birthing centers located in 4 provinces of Nepal. Using updated national training manuals and teaching aids, these clinical mentors assessed and taught 12 core EmONC clinical skills to their nurse-mentees. Clinical mentors worked with management mentors whose goal was to improve the nurses’ working environment. We assessed whether the cohort of nurse-mentees performed better as a group and individually performed better at the end of the program than at baseline using relevant tests (chi-square test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, and Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-population rank test). RESULTS: In total, 308 nurses were assessed, including 96 (31.2%), 77 (25.0%) and 135 (43.8%) who participated in all three, two or only one mentoring session, respectively. In total, 225 (73.0%) worked as auxiliary nurse-midwives (ANMs), while 69 (22.4%) worked as nurses. One hundred and ninety five (63.3%) were trained as skilled birth attendants, of which 45 (23.1%) were nurses, 141 (72.3%) were auxiliaries and 9 (4.6%) had other positions. The proportion of ANMs and nurse-mentees who obtained a knowledge assessment score ≥ 85% increased from 57.8 to 86.1% (p <  0.001). Clinical assessment scores increased significantly for each participant, and therefore for the group. SBA-trained mentees had better knowledge of maternal and new-born care and were better able to perform the 12 core clinical skills throughout the program. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that on-site clinical mentoring of nurses coupled with health facility management mentoring can improve nurses’ clinical competences in and performance of maternity and new-born care. Assessing evidence of impact on patient safety would be the next stage in evaluating this promising intervention. BioMed Central 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6950904/ /pubmed/31920460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0396-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goyet, Sophie
Rajbhandari, Swaraj
Alvarez, Valerie Broch
Bayou, Aida
Khanal, Sirjana
Pokhrel, Tara Nath
On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title_full On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title_fullStr On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title_short On-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in Nepal
title_sort on-site clinical mentoring as a maternal and new-born care quality improvement method: evidence from a nurse cohort study in nepal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0396-1
work_keys_str_mv AT goyetsophie onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal
AT rajbhandariswaraj onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal
AT alvarezvaleriebroch onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal
AT bayouaida onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal
AT khanalsirjana onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal
AT pokhreltaranath onsiteclinicalmentoringasamaternalandnewborncarequalityimprovementmethodevidencefromanursecohortstudyinnepal