Cargando…

The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers

The dose emission from DPIs can be affected by the inspiratory parameters achieved by the patient as well as the device in-use. Conventional in-vitro dose emission methodology was used, but instead of using inhalation volume (Vin) of 2 or 4 L and peak inhalation flow (PIF) corresponding to 4 kPa, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abadelah, Mohamad, Al-Assadi, Jumannah, Rooney, James, Larhrib, Hassane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.007
_version_ 1783486192342269952
author Abadelah, Mohamad
Al-Assadi, Jumannah
Rooney, James
Larhrib, Hassane
author_facet Abadelah, Mohamad
Al-Assadi, Jumannah
Rooney, James
Larhrib, Hassane
author_sort Abadelah, Mohamad
collection PubMed
description The dose emission from DPIs can be affected by the inspiratory parameters achieved by the patient as well as the device in-use. Conventional in-vitro dose emission methodology was used, but instead of using inhalation volume (Vin) of 2 or 4 L and peak inhalation flow (PIF) corresponding to 4 kPa, a range of PIFs (28.3, 60, 90 and 120 L min(−1)) and Vins (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, and 4 L) were used. The formulation was composed of spray dried Theophylline as a model drug with Lactohale® α lactose monohydrate carrier. The formulation was aerosolised using two DPIs; a low resistance Breezhaler® and high resistance Handihaler®. The formulation showed a consistent dose content uniformity with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 1.70%. The drug distribution on the surface of the carrier was obvious from the SE micrographs with some drug particles lodged into lactose crevices. The dose emission after the first inhalation (ED1) and total emitted dose (TED) of theophylline increased with PIF and Vin, irrespective of the inhaler device. However, the dose delivered was superior for the Handihaler® compared to Breezhaler®. Drug retention in the capsule and device was high at low PIFs and Vins and reduced after the second inhalation. Therefore, our study supports the recommendations for patients who cannot achieve sufficient PIF and Vin to inhale twice for each dose to ensure the better clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6950967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69509672020-01-09 The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers Abadelah, Mohamad Al-Assadi, Jumannah Rooney, James Larhrib, Hassane Saudi Pharm J Article The dose emission from DPIs can be affected by the inspiratory parameters achieved by the patient as well as the device in-use. Conventional in-vitro dose emission methodology was used, but instead of using inhalation volume (Vin) of 2 or 4 L and peak inhalation flow (PIF) corresponding to 4 kPa, a range of PIFs (28.3, 60, 90 and 120 L min(−1)) and Vins (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, and 4 L) were used. The formulation was composed of spray dried Theophylline as a model drug with Lactohale® α lactose monohydrate carrier. The formulation was aerosolised using two DPIs; a low resistance Breezhaler® and high resistance Handihaler®. The formulation showed a consistent dose content uniformity with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 1.70%. The drug distribution on the surface of the carrier was obvious from the SE micrographs with some drug particles lodged into lactose crevices. The dose emission after the first inhalation (ED1) and total emitted dose (TED) of theophylline increased with PIF and Vin, irrespective of the inhaler device. However, the dose delivered was superior for the Handihaler® compared to Breezhaler®. Drug retention in the capsule and device was high at low PIFs and Vins and reduced after the second inhalation. Therefore, our study supports the recommendations for patients who cannot achieve sufficient PIF and Vin to inhale twice for each dose to ensure the better clinical outcome. Elsevier 2020-01 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6950967/ /pubmed/31920434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.007 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abadelah, Mohamad
Al-Assadi, Jumannah
Rooney, James
Larhrib, Hassane
The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title_full The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title_fullStr The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title_full_unstemmed The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title_short The effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
title_sort effect of inspiratory parameters after two separate inhalations on the dose emission of theophylline from low and high resistance dry powder inhalers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6950967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT abadelahmohamad theeffectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT alassadijumannah theeffectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT rooneyjames theeffectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT larhribhassane theeffectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT abadelahmohamad effectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT alassadijumannah effectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT rooneyjames effectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers
AT larhribhassane effectofinspiratoryparametersaftertwoseparateinhalationsonthedoseemissionoftheophyllinefromlowandhighresistancedrypowderinhalers