Cargando…

Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot

BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot repair results in late occurrence of pulmonary regurgitation, which requires pulmonary valve replacement in a large proportion of patients. Both homografts and bioprostheses are used for pulmonary valve replacement as uncertainty remains on which prosthesis should be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cocomello, Lucia, Meloni, Marco, Rapetto, Filippo, Baquedano, Mai, Ordoñez, Maria Victoria, Biglino, Giovanni, Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara, Parry, Andrew, Stoica, Serban, Caputo, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013654
_version_ 1783486215417233408
author Cocomello, Lucia
Meloni, Marco
Rapetto, Filippo
Baquedano, Mai
Ordoñez, Maria Victoria
Biglino, Giovanni
Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara
Parry, Andrew
Stoica, Serban
Caputo, Massimo
author_facet Cocomello, Lucia
Meloni, Marco
Rapetto, Filippo
Baquedano, Mai
Ordoñez, Maria Victoria
Biglino, Giovanni
Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara
Parry, Andrew
Stoica, Serban
Caputo, Massimo
author_sort Cocomello, Lucia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot repair results in late occurrence of pulmonary regurgitation, which requires pulmonary valve replacement in a large proportion of patients. Both homografts and bioprostheses are used for pulmonary valve replacement as uncertainty remains on which prosthesis should be considered superior. We performed a long‐term imaging and clinical comparison between these 2 strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared echocardiographic and clinical follow‐up data of 209 patients with previous tetralogy of Fallot repair who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with homograft (n=75) or bioprosthesis (n=134) between 1995 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital. The primary end point was the composite of pulmonary valve replacement reintervention and structural valve deterioration, defined as a transpulmonary pressure decrease ≥50 mm Hg or pulmonary regurgitation degree of ≥2. Mixed linear model and Cox regression model were used for comparisons. Echocardiographic follow‐up duration was longer in the homograft group (8 [interquartile range, 4–12] versus 4 [interquartile range, 3–6] years; P<0.001). At the latest echocardiographic follow‐up, homografts showed a significantly lower transpulmonary systolic pressure decrease (16 [interquartile range, 12–25] mm Hg) when compared with bioprostheses (28 [interquartile range, 18–41] mm Hg; mixed model P<0.001) and a similar degree of pulmonary regurgitation (degree 0‐4) (1 [interquartile range, 0–2] versus 2 [interquartile range, 0–2]; mixed model P=0.19). At 9 years, freedom from structural valve deterioration and reintervention was 81.6% (95% CI, 71.5%–91.6%) versus 43.4% (95% CI, 23.6%–63.2%) in the homograft and bioprosthesis groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13–0.55; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with bioprostheses, pulmonary homografts were associated lower transvalvular gradient during follow‐up and were associated with a significantly lower risk of reintervention or structural valve degeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6951084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69510842020-01-10 Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot Cocomello, Lucia Meloni, Marco Rapetto, Filippo Baquedano, Mai Ordoñez, Maria Victoria Biglino, Giovanni Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara Parry, Andrew Stoica, Serban Caputo, Massimo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot repair results in late occurrence of pulmonary regurgitation, which requires pulmonary valve replacement in a large proportion of patients. Both homografts and bioprostheses are used for pulmonary valve replacement as uncertainty remains on which prosthesis should be considered superior. We performed a long‐term imaging and clinical comparison between these 2 strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared echocardiographic and clinical follow‐up data of 209 patients with previous tetralogy of Fallot repair who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with homograft (n=75) or bioprosthesis (n=134) between 1995 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital. The primary end point was the composite of pulmonary valve replacement reintervention and structural valve deterioration, defined as a transpulmonary pressure decrease ≥50 mm Hg or pulmonary regurgitation degree of ≥2. Mixed linear model and Cox regression model were used for comparisons. Echocardiographic follow‐up duration was longer in the homograft group (8 [interquartile range, 4–12] versus 4 [interquartile range, 3–6] years; P<0.001). At the latest echocardiographic follow‐up, homografts showed a significantly lower transpulmonary systolic pressure decrease (16 [interquartile range, 12–25] mm Hg) when compared with bioprostheses (28 [interquartile range, 18–41] mm Hg; mixed model P<0.001) and a similar degree of pulmonary regurgitation (degree 0‐4) (1 [interquartile range, 0–2] versus 2 [interquartile range, 0–2]; mixed model P=0.19). At 9 years, freedom from structural valve deterioration and reintervention was 81.6% (95% CI, 71.5%–91.6%) versus 43.4% (95% CI, 23.6%–63.2%) in the homograft and bioprosthesis groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13–0.55; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with bioprostheses, pulmonary homografts were associated lower transvalvular gradient during follow‐up and were associated with a significantly lower risk of reintervention or structural valve degeneration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6951084/ /pubmed/31838974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013654 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cocomello, Lucia
Meloni, Marco
Rapetto, Filippo
Baquedano, Mai
Ordoñez, Maria Victoria
Biglino, Giovanni
Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara
Parry, Andrew
Stoica, Serban
Caputo, Massimo
Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title_full Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title_fullStr Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title_full_unstemmed Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title_short Long‐Term Comparison Between Pulmonary Homograft Versus Bioprosthesis for Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot
title_sort long‐term comparison between pulmonary homograft versus bioprosthesis for pulmonary valve replacement in tetralogy of fallot
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013654
work_keys_str_mv AT cocomellolucia longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT melonimarco longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT rapettofilippo longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT baquedanomai longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT ordonezmariavictoria longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT biglinogiovanni longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT bucciarelliduccichiara longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT parryandrew longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT stoicaserban longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot
AT caputomassimo longtermcomparisonbetweenpulmonaryhomograftversusbioprosthesisforpulmonaryvalvereplacementintetralogyoffallot