Cargando…
Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock
BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding long‐term outcomes in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3‐year clinical outcomes of patients with ST‐segment‐eleva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013870 |
_version_ | 1783486215876509696 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Joo Myung Rhee, Tae‐Min Kim, Hyun Kuk Hwang, Doyeon Lee, Seung Hun Choi, Ki Hong Kim, Jihoon Park, Taek Kyu Yang, Jeong Hoon Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin‐Ho Choi, Seung‐Hyuk Koo, Bon‐Kwon Chae, Shung Chull Cho, Myeong‐Chan Kim, Chong Jin Kim, Ju Han Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon‐Cheol Jeong, Myung Ho Hahn, Joo‐Yong |
author_facet | Lee, Joo Myung Rhee, Tae‐Min Kim, Hyun Kuk Hwang, Doyeon Lee, Seung Hun Choi, Ki Hong Kim, Jihoon Park, Taek Kyu Yang, Jeong Hoon Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin‐Ho Choi, Seung‐Hyuk Koo, Bon‐Kwon Chae, Shung Chull Cho, Myeong‐Chan Kim, Chong Jin Kim, Ju Han Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon‐Cheol Jeong, Myung Ho Hahn, Joo‐Yong |
author_sort | Lee, Joo Myung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding long‐term outcomes in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3‐year clinical outcomes of patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct‐related artery (IRA)–only PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 13 104 patients from the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR‐NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry––National Institutes of Health) registry, we selected 659 patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction who had concomitant non‐IRA stenosis and presented with cardiogenic shock. The primary outcome was all‐cause death. Multivessel PCI was performed in 260 patients and IRA‐only PCI in 399 patients. At 3 years, patients in the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.94 [P=0.024]), all‐cause death or MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84 [P=0.004]), and non‐IRA repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10–0.50 [P<0.001]) than those in the IRA‐only PCI group. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis. Landmark analysis at 1 year demonstrated that the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of recurrent MI and non‐IRA repeat revascularization beyond 1 year (log‐rank P=0.030 and P=0.017, respectively) than the IRA‐only PCI group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of all‐cause death than IRA‐only PCI at 3 years, suggesting potential benefit of non‐IRA revascularization during the index hospitalization to improve long‐term clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6951086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69510862020-01-10 Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock Lee, Joo Myung Rhee, Tae‐Min Kim, Hyun Kuk Hwang, Doyeon Lee, Seung Hun Choi, Ki Hong Kim, Jihoon Park, Taek Kyu Yang, Jeong Hoon Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin‐Ho Choi, Seung‐Hyuk Koo, Bon‐Kwon Chae, Shung Chull Cho, Myeong‐Chan Kim, Chong Jin Kim, Ju Han Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon‐Cheol Jeong, Myung Ho Hahn, Joo‐Yong J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding long‐term outcomes in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease presenting with cardiogenic shock according to revascularization strategy. We sought to compare the 3‐year clinical outcomes of patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction multivessel disease with cardiogenic shock and patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and infarct‐related artery (IRA)–only PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 13 104 patients from the nationwide, multicenter, prospective KAMIR‐NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry––National Institutes of Health) registry, we selected 659 patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction who had concomitant non‐IRA stenosis and presented with cardiogenic shock. The primary outcome was all‐cause death. Multivessel PCI was performed in 260 patients and IRA‐only PCI in 399 patients. At 3 years, patients in the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.94 [P=0.024]), all‐cause death or MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84 [P=0.004]), and non‐IRA repeat revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10–0.50 [P<0.001]) than those in the IRA‐only PCI group. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analysis. Landmark analysis at 1 year demonstrated that the multivessel PCI group had a lower risk of recurrent MI and non‐IRA repeat revascularization beyond 1 year (log‐rank P=0.030 and P=0.017, respectively) than the IRA‐only PCI group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of all‐cause death than IRA‐only PCI at 3 years, suggesting potential benefit of non‐IRA revascularization during the index hospitalization to improve long‐term clinical outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6951086/ /pubmed/31818215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013870 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lee, Joo Myung Rhee, Tae‐Min Kim, Hyun Kuk Hwang, Doyeon Lee, Seung Hun Choi, Ki Hong Kim, Jihoon Park, Taek Kyu Yang, Jeong Hoon Song, Young Bin Choi, Jin‐Ho Choi, Seung‐Hyuk Koo, Bon‐Kwon Chae, Shung Chull Cho, Myeong‐Chan Kim, Chong Jin Kim, Ju Han Kim, Hyo‐Soo Gwon, Hyeon‐Cheol Jeong, Myung Ho Hahn, Joo‐Yong Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title | Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full | Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title_short | Comparison of Long‐Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct‐Related Artery–Only Revascularization for Patients With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock |
title_sort | comparison of long‐term clinical outcome between multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus infarct‐related artery–only revascularization for patients with st‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejoomyung comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT rheetaemin comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT kimhyunkuk comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT hwangdoyeon comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT leeseunghun comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT choikihong comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT kimjihoon comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT parktaekkyu comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT yangjeonghoon comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT songyoungbin comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT choijinho comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT choiseunghyuk comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT koobonkwon comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT chaeshungchull comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT chomyeongchan comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT kimchongjin comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT kimjuhan comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT kimhyosoo comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT gwonhyeoncheol comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT jeongmyungho comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT hahnjooyong comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock AT comparisonoflongtermclinicaloutcomebetweenmultivesselpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversusinfarctrelatedarteryonlyrevascularizationforpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionwithcardiogenicshock |