Cargando…

Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) and intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) combination therapy with IAI monotherapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate the number of injections and SMYL sessions required. METHODS: This pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanar, Hatice Selen, Arsan, Aysu, Altun, Ahmet, Akı, Suat Fazıl, Hacısalihoglu, Aynur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856493
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_350_19
_version_ 1783486219698569216
author Kanar, Hatice Selen
Arsan, Aysu
Altun, Ahmet
Akı, Suat Fazıl
Hacısalihoglu, Aynur
author_facet Kanar, Hatice Selen
Arsan, Aysu
Altun, Ahmet
Akı, Suat Fazıl
Hacısalihoglu, Aynur
author_sort Kanar, Hatice Selen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) and intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) combination therapy with IAI monotherapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate the number of injections and SMYL sessions required. METHODS: This prospective study compared a group of 28 patients treated with a combination of SMYL and IAI with a group of 28 patients treated only with IAI. All patients initially received 3 monthly IAIs, and the monotherapy group was given additional injections as needed. The combination therapy patients additionally received SMYL after the loading phase. The primary outcome measures were the change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to month 12; the secondary outcomes were the mean number of required injections and SMYL sessions. RESULTS: In the monotherapy group, the BCVA improved from 0.38 ± 0.10 to 0.20 ± 0.10 logMAR; in the combination group, BCVA improved from 0.40 ± 0.09 to 0.17 ± 0.06 logMAR at the end of the 12(th) month. The CMT was reduced from 451.28 ± 44.85 to 328.8 ± 49.69 μm in the monotherapy group and from 466.07 ± 71.79 to 312.0 ± 39.29 μm in the combination group. Improvement of the mean BCVA and reduction of the mean CMT were similar in each group. The combination group required significantly fewer injections (3.21 ± 0.41 vs 5.39 ± 1.54; P < 0.001). By month 12, 75% of patients in the monotherapy group had required additional IAIs when compared with 16% in the combination group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SMYL combination therapy demonstrated significant visual improvements in patients with DME. In the combination group, the retreatment rate and number of required injections were significantly lower compared with the IAI monotherapy group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6951119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69511192020-01-16 Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial Kanar, Hatice Selen Arsan, Aysu Altun, Ahmet Akı, Suat Fazıl Hacısalihoglu, Aynur Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SMYL) and intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) combination therapy with IAI monotherapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate the number of injections and SMYL sessions required. METHODS: This prospective study compared a group of 28 patients treated with a combination of SMYL and IAI with a group of 28 patients treated only with IAI. All patients initially received 3 monthly IAIs, and the monotherapy group was given additional injections as needed. The combination therapy patients additionally received SMYL after the loading phase. The primary outcome measures were the change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to month 12; the secondary outcomes were the mean number of required injections and SMYL sessions. RESULTS: In the monotherapy group, the BCVA improved from 0.38 ± 0.10 to 0.20 ± 0.10 logMAR; in the combination group, BCVA improved from 0.40 ± 0.09 to 0.17 ± 0.06 logMAR at the end of the 12(th) month. The CMT was reduced from 451.28 ± 44.85 to 328.8 ± 49.69 μm in the monotherapy group and from 466.07 ± 71.79 to 312.0 ± 39.29 μm in the combination group. Improvement of the mean BCVA and reduction of the mean CMT were similar in each group. The combination group required significantly fewer injections (3.21 ± 0.41 vs 5.39 ± 1.54; P < 0.001). By month 12, 75% of patients in the monotherapy group had required additional IAIs when compared with 16% in the combination group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SMYL combination therapy demonstrated significant visual improvements in patients with DME. In the combination group, the retreatment rate and number of required injections were significantly lower compared with the IAI monotherapy group. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6951119/ /pubmed/31856493 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_350_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kanar, Hatice Selen
Arsan, Aysu
Altun, Ahmet
Akı, Suat Fazıl
Hacısalihoglu, Aynur
Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title_full Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title_short Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial
title_sort can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856493
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_350_19
work_keys_str_mv AT kanarhaticeselen cansubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentchangetheantivascularendothelialgrowthfactoralgorithmindiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arsanaysu cansubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentchangetheantivascularendothelialgrowthfactoralgorithmindiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT altunahmet cansubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentchangetheantivascularendothelialgrowthfactoralgorithmindiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT akısuatfazıl cansubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentchangetheantivascularendothelialgrowthfactoralgorithmindiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hacısalihogluaynur cansubthresholdmicropulseyellowlasertreatmentchangetheantivascularendothelialgrowthfactoralgorithmindiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedclinicaltrial