Cargando…

Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis

PURPOSE: This study was aimed at identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in bacterial and fungal keratitis. The candidate genes can be selected and quantified to distinguish between causative agents of infectious keratitis to improve therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: The expression profile of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Rui, Zou, He, Wang, Lufei, Liu, Lu, Song, Meijiao, Zhang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_65_19
_version_ 1783486241053868032
author Tian, Rui
Zou, He
Wang, Lufei
Liu, Lu
Song, Meijiao
Zhang, Hui
author_facet Tian, Rui
Zou, He
Wang, Lufei
Liu, Lu
Song, Meijiao
Zhang, Hui
author_sort Tian, Rui
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was aimed at identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in bacterial and fungal keratitis. The candidate genes can be selected and quantified to distinguish between causative agents of infectious keratitis to improve therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: The expression profile of bacterial or fungal infection, and normal corneal tissues were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. The limma package in R was used to screen DEGs in bacterial and fungal keratitis. The Co-Express tool was used to calculate correlation coefficients of co-expressed genes. The “Advanced network merge” function of Cytoscape tool was applied to obtain a fusional co-expression network based on bacterial and fungal keratitis DEGs. Finally, functional enrichment analysis by DAVID software and KEGG analysis by KOBAS of DEGs in fusion network were performed. RESULTS: In total, 451 DEGs in bacterial keratitis and 353 DEGs in fungal keratitis were screened, among which 148 DEGs were found only in bacterial keratitis and 50 DEGs only in fungal keratitis. Besides, 117 co-expressed gene pairs were identified among bacterial keratitis DEGs and 87 pairs among fungal keratitis DEGs. In total, nine biological pathways and seven KEGG pathways were screened by analyzing DEGs in the fusional co-expression network. CONCLUSION: TLR4 is the representative DEG specific to bacterial keratitis, and SOD2 is the representative DEG specific to fungal keratitis, both of which are promising candidate genes to distinguish between bacterial and fungal keratitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6951210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69512102020-01-16 Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis Tian, Rui Zou, He Wang, Lufei Liu, Lu Song, Meijiao Zhang, Hui Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: This study was aimed at identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in bacterial and fungal keratitis. The candidate genes can be selected and quantified to distinguish between causative agents of infectious keratitis to improve therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: The expression profile of bacterial or fungal infection, and normal corneal tissues were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. The limma package in R was used to screen DEGs in bacterial and fungal keratitis. The Co-Express tool was used to calculate correlation coefficients of co-expressed genes. The “Advanced network merge” function of Cytoscape tool was applied to obtain a fusional co-expression network based on bacterial and fungal keratitis DEGs. Finally, functional enrichment analysis by DAVID software and KEGG analysis by KOBAS of DEGs in fusion network were performed. RESULTS: In total, 451 DEGs in bacterial keratitis and 353 DEGs in fungal keratitis were screened, among which 148 DEGs were found only in bacterial keratitis and 50 DEGs only in fungal keratitis. Besides, 117 co-expressed gene pairs were identified among bacterial keratitis DEGs and 87 pairs among fungal keratitis DEGs. In total, nine biological pathways and seven KEGG pathways were screened by analyzing DEGs in the fusional co-expression network. CONCLUSION: TLR4 is the representative DEG specific to bacterial keratitis, and SOD2 is the representative DEG specific to fungal keratitis, both of which are promising candidate genes to distinguish between bacterial and fungal keratitis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-01 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6951210/ /pubmed/31856463 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_65_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tian, Rui
Zou, He
Wang, Lufei
Liu, Lu
Song, Meijiao
Zhang, Hui
Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title_full Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title_fullStr Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title_short Analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
title_sort analysis of differentially expressed genes in bacterial and fungal keratitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856463
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_65_19
work_keys_str_mv AT tianrui analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis
AT zouhe analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis
AT wanglufei analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis
AT liulu analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis
AT songmeijiao analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis
AT zhanghui analysisofdifferentiallyexpressedgenesinbacterialandfungalkeratitis