Cargando…

Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND: We describe the creation and evaluation of a personal audit and feedback (A&F) tool for anesthesiologists. METHODS: A survey aimed at capturing barriers for personal improvement efforts and feedback preferences was administered to attending anesthesiologists. The results informed the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbeito, Atilio, Segall, Noa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy054
_version_ 1783486367395741696
author Barbeito, Atilio
Segall, Noa
author_facet Barbeito, Atilio
Segall, Noa
author_sort Barbeito, Atilio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We describe the creation and evaluation of a personal audit and feedback (A&F) tool for anesthesiologists. METHODS: A survey aimed at capturing barriers for personal improvement efforts and feedback preferences was administered to attending anesthesiologists. The results informed the design and implementation of 4 dashboards that display information on individual practice characteristics as well as comparative performance on several quality metrics. The dashboards’ usability was then tested using the human-centered design framework. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists listed lack of information on current practice as the main barrier for improvement. Regarding usability, participants gave the dashboards an average score of 3.8 (scale 1–5) on consistency, learnability, and information organization, and performed the assigned tasks well, with an average score of 89% (range 79–100%). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the design, implementation, and usability testing of an innovative tool that utilizes data derived from the electronic health record (EHR) system to provide A&F to anesthesiology providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6951966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69519662020-01-24 Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists Barbeito, Atilio Segall, Noa JAMIA Open Case Reports BACKGROUND: We describe the creation and evaluation of a personal audit and feedback (A&F) tool for anesthesiologists. METHODS: A survey aimed at capturing barriers for personal improvement efforts and feedback preferences was administered to attending anesthesiologists. The results informed the design and implementation of 4 dashboards that display information on individual practice characteristics as well as comparative performance on several quality metrics. The dashboards’ usability was then tested using the human-centered design framework. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists listed lack of information on current practice as the main barrier for improvement. Regarding usability, participants gave the dashboards an average score of 3.8 (scale 1–5) on consistency, learnability, and information organization, and performed the assigned tasks well, with an average score of 89% (range 79–100%). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the design, implementation, and usability testing of an innovative tool that utilizes data derived from the electronic health record (EHR) system to provide A&F to anesthesiology providers. Oxford University Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6951966/ /pubmed/31984342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy054 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Case Reports
Barbeito, Atilio
Segall, Noa
Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title_full Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title_fullStr Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title_full_unstemmed Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title_short Development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
title_sort development and usability testing of an audit and feedback tool for anesthesiologists
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy054
work_keys_str_mv AT barbeitoatilio developmentandusabilitytestingofanauditandfeedbacktoolforanesthesiologists
AT segallnoa developmentandusabilitytestingofanauditandfeedbacktoolforanesthesiologists