Cargando…
A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation
OBJECTIVES: To illustrate key contextual factors that may have effects on clinical decision support (CDS) adoption and, ultimately, success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative evaluation of 2 similar radiology CDS innovations for near-term endpoints affecting adoption and present the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002 |
_version_ | 1783486374516621312 |
---|---|
author | Marcial, Laura Haak Johnston, Douglas S Shapiro, Michael R Jacobs, Sara R Blumenfeld, Barry Rojas Smith, Lucia |
author_facet | Marcial, Laura Haak Johnston, Douglas S Shapiro, Michael R Jacobs, Sara R Blumenfeld, Barry Rojas Smith, Lucia |
author_sort | Marcial, Laura Haak |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To illustrate key contextual factors that may have effects on clinical decision support (CDS) adoption and, ultimately, success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative evaluation of 2 similar radiology CDS innovations for near-term endpoints affecting adoption and present the findings using an evaluation framework. We identified key contextual factors between these 2 innovations and determined important adoption differences between them. RESULTS: Degree of electronic health record integration, approach to education and training, key drivers of adoption, and tailoring of the CDS to the clinical context were handled differently between the 2 innovations, contributing to variation in their relative degrees of adoption and use. Attention to these factors had impacts on both near and later-term measures of success (eg, patient outcomes). DISCUSSION: CDS adoption is a well-studied early-term measure of CDS success that directly impacts outcomes. Adoption requires attention throughout the design phases of an intervention especially to key factors directly affecting it, including how implementation across multiple sites and systems complicates adoption, which prior experience with CDS matters, and that practice guidelines invariably require tailoring to the clinical context. CONCLUSION: With better planning for the capture of early-term measures of successful CDS implementation, especially adoption, critical adjustments may be made to ensure that the CDS is effectively implemented to be successful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69520242020-01-24 A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation Marcial, Laura Haak Johnston, Douglas S Shapiro, Michael R Jacobs, Sara R Blumenfeld, Barry Rojas Smith, Lucia JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVES: To illustrate key contextual factors that may have effects on clinical decision support (CDS) adoption and, ultimately, success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative evaluation of 2 similar radiology CDS innovations for near-term endpoints affecting adoption and present the findings using an evaluation framework. We identified key contextual factors between these 2 innovations and determined important adoption differences between them. RESULTS: Degree of electronic health record integration, approach to education and training, key drivers of adoption, and tailoring of the CDS to the clinical context were handled differently between the 2 innovations, contributing to variation in their relative degrees of adoption and use. Attention to these factors had impacts on both near and later-term measures of success (eg, patient outcomes). DISCUSSION: CDS adoption is a well-studied early-term measure of CDS success that directly impacts outcomes. Adoption requires attention throughout the design phases of an intervention especially to key factors directly affecting it, including how implementation across multiple sites and systems complicates adoption, which prior experience with CDS matters, and that practice guidelines invariably require tailoring to the clinical context. CONCLUSION: With better planning for the capture of early-term measures of successful CDS implementation, especially adoption, critical adjustments may be made to ensure that the CDS is effectively implemented to be successful. Oxford University Press 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6952024/ /pubmed/31984353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Marcial, Laura Haak Johnston, Douglas S Shapiro, Michael R Jacobs, Sara R Blumenfeld, Barry Rojas Smith, Lucia A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title | A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title_full | A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title_fullStr | A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title_short | A qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
title_sort | qualitative framework-based evaluation of radiology clinical decision support initiatives: eliciting key factors to physician adoption in implementation |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marciallaurahaak aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT johnstondouglass aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT shapiromichaelr aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT jacobssarar aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT blumenfeldbarry aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT rojassmithlucia aqualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT marciallaurahaak qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT johnstondouglass qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT shapiromichaelr qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT jacobssarar qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT blumenfeldbarry qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation AT rojassmithlucia qualitativeframeworkbasedevaluationofradiologyclinicaldecisionsupportinitiativeselicitingkeyfactorstophysicianadoptioninimplementation |