Cargando…

Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles

The contribution of human gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and metabolites to host health has recently become much clearer. However, many confounding factors can influence the accuracy of gut microbiome and metabolome studies, resulting in inconsistencies in published results. In this study, we syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yali, Dong, Tianyu, Chen, Minjian, He, Lianping, Wang, Tingzhang, Liu, Xingyin, Chang, Hang, Mao, Jian-Hua, Hang, Bo, Snijders, Antoine M., Xia, Yankai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00763-19
_version_ 1783486404491214848
author Liang, Yali
Dong, Tianyu
Chen, Minjian
He, Lianping
Wang, Tingzhang
Liu, Xingyin
Chang, Hang
Mao, Jian-Hua
Hang, Bo
Snijders, Antoine M.
Xia, Yankai
author_facet Liang, Yali
Dong, Tianyu
Chen, Minjian
He, Lianping
Wang, Tingzhang
Liu, Xingyin
Chang, Hang
Mao, Jian-Hua
Hang, Bo
Snijders, Antoine M.
Xia, Yankai
author_sort Liang, Yali
collection PubMed
description The contribution of human gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and metabolites to host health has recently become much clearer. However, many confounding factors can influence the accuracy of gut microbiome and metabolome studies, resulting in inconsistencies in published results. In this study, we systematically investigated the effects of fecal sampling regions and storage and retrieval conditions on gut microbiome and metabolite profiles from three healthy children. Our analysis indicated that compared to homogenized and snap-frozen samples (standard control [SC]), different sampling regions did not affect microbial community alpha diversity, while a total of 22 of 176 identified metabolites varied significantly across different sampling regions. In contrast, storage conditions significantly influenced the microbiome and metabolome. Short-term room temperature storage had a minimal effect on the microbiome and metabolome profiles. Sample storage in RNALater showed a significant level of variation in both microbiome and metabolome profiles, independent of the storage or retrieval conditions. The effect of RNALater on the metabolome was stronger than the effect on the microbiome, and individual variability between study participants outweighed the effect of RNALater on the microbiome. We conclude that homogenizing stool samples was critical for metabolomic analysis but not necessary for microbiome analysis. Short-term room temperature storage had a minimal effect on the microbiome and metabolome profiles and is recommended for short-term fecal sample storage. In addition, our study indicates that the use of RNALater as a storage medium of stool samples for microbial and metabolomic analyses is not recommended. IMPORTANCE The gastrointestinal microbiome and metabolome can provide a new angle to understand the development of health and disease. Stool samples are most frequently used for large-scale cohort studies. Standardized procedures for stool sample handling and storage can be a determining factor for performing microbiome or metabolome studies. In this study, we focused on the effects of stool sampling regions and stool sample storage conditions on variations in the gut microbiome composition and metabolome profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6952195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69521952020-01-16 Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles Liang, Yali Dong, Tianyu Chen, Minjian He, Lianping Wang, Tingzhang Liu, Xingyin Chang, Hang Mao, Jian-Hua Hang, Bo Snijders, Antoine M. Xia, Yankai mSphere Research Article The contribution of human gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and metabolites to host health has recently become much clearer. However, many confounding factors can influence the accuracy of gut microbiome and metabolome studies, resulting in inconsistencies in published results. In this study, we systematically investigated the effects of fecal sampling regions and storage and retrieval conditions on gut microbiome and metabolite profiles from three healthy children. Our analysis indicated that compared to homogenized and snap-frozen samples (standard control [SC]), different sampling regions did not affect microbial community alpha diversity, while a total of 22 of 176 identified metabolites varied significantly across different sampling regions. In contrast, storage conditions significantly influenced the microbiome and metabolome. Short-term room temperature storage had a minimal effect on the microbiome and metabolome profiles. Sample storage in RNALater showed a significant level of variation in both microbiome and metabolome profiles, independent of the storage or retrieval conditions. The effect of RNALater on the metabolome was stronger than the effect on the microbiome, and individual variability between study participants outweighed the effect of RNALater on the microbiome. We conclude that homogenizing stool samples was critical for metabolomic analysis but not necessary for microbiome analysis. Short-term room temperature storage had a minimal effect on the microbiome and metabolome profiles and is recommended for short-term fecal sample storage. In addition, our study indicates that the use of RNALater as a storage medium of stool samples for microbial and metabolomic analyses is not recommended. IMPORTANCE The gastrointestinal microbiome and metabolome can provide a new angle to understand the development of health and disease. Stool samples are most frequently used for large-scale cohort studies. Standardized procedures for stool sample handling and storage can be a determining factor for performing microbiome or metabolome studies. In this study, we focused on the effects of stool sampling regions and stool sample storage conditions on variations in the gut microbiome composition and metabolome profile. American Society for Microbiology 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6952195/ /pubmed/31915218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00763-19 Text en Copyright © 2020 Liang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Liang, Yali
Dong, Tianyu
Chen, Minjian
He, Lianping
Wang, Tingzhang
Liu, Xingyin
Chang, Hang
Mao, Jian-Hua
Hang, Bo
Snijders, Antoine M.
Xia, Yankai
Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title_full Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title_fullStr Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title_short Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles
title_sort systematic analysis of impact of sampling regions and storage methods on fecal gut microbiome and metabolome profiles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00763-19
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyali systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT dongtianyu systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT chenminjian systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT helianping systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT wangtingzhang systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT liuxingyin systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT changhang systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT maojianhua systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT hangbo systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT snijdersantoinem systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles
AT xiayankai systematicanalysisofimpactofsamplingregionsandstoragemethodsonfecalgutmicrobiomeandmetabolomeprofiles