Cargando…
Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions
Infertility has been a common postoperative problem caused by peritoneal adhesions. Since several prophylactic agents have recently shown promising preliminary results, more complete studies comparing their real efficacy and safety are needed urgently. The aim of this study was to investigate and de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219105 |
_version_ | 1783486411627823104 |
---|---|
author | Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Mendes, Fernando Luis Fernandes de Andrade, Claudio Moura Cardeman, Leon de Nadai Filho, Nilton Portari, Elyzabeth Avvad Fonseca, Marlon de Freitas |
author_facet | Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Mendes, Fernando Luis Fernandes de Andrade, Claudio Moura Cardeman, Leon de Nadai Filho, Nilton Portari, Elyzabeth Avvad Fonseca, Marlon de Freitas |
author_sort | Crispi, Claudio Peixoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infertility has been a common postoperative problem caused by peritoneal adhesions. Since several prophylactic agents have recently shown promising preliminary results, more complete studies comparing their real efficacy and safety are needed urgently. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe practical considerations of a porcine model that can be used to assess such prophylactic agents. First, 10 healthy 5½ months old female pigs (24.3–31.3 Kg) underwent a standardized laparoscopy to provoke peritubal adhesion formation without prophylactic agents. After 30 days, a second-look laparoscopy was performed to evaluate adhesions and perform adnexectomy for histopathological evaluation. Adhesions at different sites were classified by grade, for which the scores range from 0 (no adhesion) to 3 (very strong vascularized adhesions), and also by area, with scores ranging from 0 (no adhesion) to 4 (>75% of the injured area). The histopathological evaluation of the distal uterine horns, oviducts and ovaries were compared withthose from a control group of six healthy pigs with no previous surgery. Biological samples were collected to assess vitality, inflammation and renal, hepatic and hematopoietic systems. There were small (but significant) changes in serum albumin (P = 0.07), globulin (P = 0.07), C-reactive protein (P = 0.011), fibrinogen (P = 0.023) and bilirubin (P<0.01) after 30 days, but all values were within the normal range. No inflammation or abscess formation was observed, but different degrees of adhesion were identified. The estimated occurrence of adhesion (scores >0) and of strong / very strong adhesion (scores >1) was 75% (95% CI: 55–94.9) and 65% (95% CI: 45–85), respectively. The porcine model represents a useful animal platform that can be used to test the efficacy and safety of candidate prophylactic agents intended to prevent postoperative peritubal adhesions formation. We present several practical considerations and measures that can help to minimize animal suffering and avoid problems during such experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69522542020-01-21 Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Mendes, Fernando Luis Fernandes de Andrade, Claudio Moura Cardeman, Leon de Nadai Filho, Nilton Portari, Elyzabeth Avvad Fonseca, Marlon de Freitas PLoS One Research Article Infertility has been a common postoperative problem caused by peritoneal adhesions. Since several prophylactic agents have recently shown promising preliminary results, more complete studies comparing their real efficacy and safety are needed urgently. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe practical considerations of a porcine model that can be used to assess such prophylactic agents. First, 10 healthy 5½ months old female pigs (24.3–31.3 Kg) underwent a standardized laparoscopy to provoke peritubal adhesion formation without prophylactic agents. After 30 days, a second-look laparoscopy was performed to evaluate adhesions and perform adnexectomy for histopathological evaluation. Adhesions at different sites were classified by grade, for which the scores range from 0 (no adhesion) to 3 (very strong vascularized adhesions), and also by area, with scores ranging from 0 (no adhesion) to 4 (>75% of the injured area). The histopathological evaluation of the distal uterine horns, oviducts and ovaries were compared withthose from a control group of six healthy pigs with no previous surgery. Biological samples were collected to assess vitality, inflammation and renal, hepatic and hematopoietic systems. There were small (but significant) changes in serum albumin (P = 0.07), globulin (P = 0.07), C-reactive protein (P = 0.011), fibrinogen (P = 0.023) and bilirubin (P<0.01) after 30 days, but all values were within the normal range. No inflammation or abscess formation was observed, but different degrees of adhesion were identified. The estimated occurrence of adhesion (scores >0) and of strong / very strong adhesion (scores >1) was 75% (95% CI: 55–94.9) and 65% (95% CI: 45–85), respectively. The porcine model represents a useful animal platform that can be used to test the efficacy and safety of candidate prophylactic agents intended to prevent postoperative peritubal adhesions formation. We present several practical considerations and measures that can help to minimize animal suffering and avoid problems during such experiments. Public Library of Science 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6952254/ /pubmed/31918436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219105 Text en © 2020 Crispi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Crispi, Claudio Peixoto Mendes, Fernando Luis Fernandes de Andrade, Claudio Moura Cardeman, Leon de Nadai Filho, Nilton Portari, Elyzabeth Avvad Fonseca, Marlon de Freitas Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title | Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title_full | Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title_fullStr | Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title_short | Practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (Sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
title_sort | practical considerations in the use of a porcine model (sus scrofa domesticus) to assess prevention of postoperative peritubal adhesions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crispiclaudiopeixoto practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT crispiclaudiopeixoto practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT mendesfernandoluisfernandes practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT deandradeclaudiomoura practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT cardemanleon practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT denadaifilhonilton practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT portarielyzabethavvad practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions AT fonsecamarlondefreitas practicalconsiderationsintheuseofaporcinemodelsusscrofadomesticustoassesspreventionofpostoperativeperitubaladhesions |