Cargando…
Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content
Mental models provide a cognitive framework allowing for spatially organizing information while reasoning about the world. However, transitive reasoning studies often rely on perception of stimuli that contain visible spatial features, allowing the possibility that associated neural representations...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31925291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0740-8 |
_version_ | 1783486438595100672 |
---|---|
author | Alfred, Katherine L. Connolly, Andrew C. Cetron, Joshua S. Kraemer, David J. M. |
author_facet | Alfred, Katherine L. Connolly, Andrew C. Cetron, Joshua S. Kraemer, David J. M. |
author_sort | Alfred, Katherine L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mental models provide a cognitive framework allowing for spatially organizing information while reasoning about the world. However, transitive reasoning studies often rely on perception of stimuli that contain visible spatial features, allowing the possibility that associated neural representations are specific to inherently spatial content. Here, we test the hypothesis that neural representations of mental models generated through transitive reasoning rely on a frontoparietal network irrespective of the spatial nature of the stimulus content. Content within three models ranges from expressly visuospatial to abstract. All mental models participants generated were based on inferred relationships never directly observed. Here, using multivariate representational similarity analysis, we show that patterns representative of mental models were revealed in both superior parietal lobule and anterior prefrontal cortex and converged across stimulus types. These results support the conclusion that, independent of content, transitive reasoning using mental models relies on neural mechanisms associated with spatial cognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69523872020-01-13 Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content Alfred, Katherine L. Connolly, Andrew C. Cetron, Joshua S. Kraemer, David J. M. Commun Biol Article Mental models provide a cognitive framework allowing for spatially organizing information while reasoning about the world. However, transitive reasoning studies often rely on perception of stimuli that contain visible spatial features, allowing the possibility that associated neural representations are specific to inherently spatial content. Here, we test the hypothesis that neural representations of mental models generated through transitive reasoning rely on a frontoparietal network irrespective of the spatial nature of the stimulus content. Content within three models ranges from expressly visuospatial to abstract. All mental models participants generated were based on inferred relationships never directly observed. Here, using multivariate representational similarity analysis, we show that patterns representative of mental models were revealed in both superior parietal lobule and anterior prefrontal cortex and converged across stimulus types. These results support the conclusion that, independent of content, transitive reasoning using mental models relies on neural mechanisms associated with spatial cognition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6952387/ /pubmed/31925291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0740-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Alfred, Katherine L. Connolly, Andrew C. Cetron, Joshua S. Kraemer, David J. M. Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title | Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title_full | Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title_fullStr | Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title_full_unstemmed | Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title_short | Mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
title_sort | mental models use common neural spatial structure for spatial and abstract content |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31925291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0740-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alfredkatherinel mentalmodelsusecommonneuralspatialstructureforspatialandabstractcontent AT connollyandrewc mentalmodelsusecommonneuralspatialstructureforspatialandabstractcontent AT cetronjoshuas mentalmodelsusecommonneuralspatialstructureforspatialandabstractcontent AT kraemerdavidjm mentalmodelsusecommonneuralspatialstructureforspatialandabstractcontent |