Cargando…
High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes
OBJECTIVES: High‐need (HN) Medicare beneficiaries heavily use healthcare services at a high cost. This population is heterogeneous, composed of individuals with varying degrees of medical complexity and healthcare needs. To improve healthcare delivery and decrease costs, it is critical to identify t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16146 |
_version_ | 1783486462442864640 |
---|---|
author | Keeney, Tamra Belanger, Emmanuelle Jones, Rich N. Joyce, Nina R. Meyers, David J. Mor, Vincent |
author_facet | Keeney, Tamra Belanger, Emmanuelle Jones, Rich N. Joyce, Nina R. Meyers, David J. Mor, Vincent |
author_sort | Keeney, Tamra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: High‐need (HN) Medicare beneficiaries heavily use healthcare services at a high cost. This population is heterogeneous, composed of individuals with varying degrees of medical complexity and healthcare needs. To improve healthcare delivery and decrease costs, it is critical to identify the subpopulations present within this population. We aimed to (1) identify distinct clinical phenotypes present within HN Medicare beneficiaries, and (2) examine differences in outcomes between phenotypes. DESIGN: Latent class analysis was used to identify phenotypes within a sample of HN fee‐for‐service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older using Medicare claims and post‐acute assessment data. SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Two cross‐sectional cohorts were used to identify phenotypes. Cohorts included FFS Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who survived through 2014 (n = 415 659) and 2015 (n = 416 643). MEASUREMENTS: The following variables were used to identify phenotypes: acute and post‐acute care use, functional dependency in one or more activities of daily living, presence of six or more chronic conditions, and complex chronic conditions. Mortality, hospitalizations, healthcare expenditures, and days in the community were compared between phenotypes. RESULTS: Five phenotypes were identified: (1) comorbid ischemic heart disease with hospitalization and skilled nursing facility use (22% of the HN sample), (2) comorbid ischemic heart disease with home care use (23%), (3) home care use (12%), (4) high comorbidity with hospitalization (32%), and (5) Alzheimer's disease/related dementias with functional dependency and nursing home use (11%). Mortality was highest in phenotypes 1 and 2; hospitalizations and expenditures were highest in phenotypes 1, 3, and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a first step toward classifying the heterogeneity among HN Medicare beneficiaries. Further work is needed to identify modifiable utilization patterns between phenotypes to improve the value of healthcare provided to these subpopulations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:70–77, 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69525362020-01-10 High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes Keeney, Tamra Belanger, Emmanuelle Jones, Rich N. Joyce, Nina R. Meyers, David J. Mor, Vincent J Am Geriatr Soc Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: High‐need (HN) Medicare beneficiaries heavily use healthcare services at a high cost. This population is heterogeneous, composed of individuals with varying degrees of medical complexity and healthcare needs. To improve healthcare delivery and decrease costs, it is critical to identify the subpopulations present within this population. We aimed to (1) identify distinct clinical phenotypes present within HN Medicare beneficiaries, and (2) examine differences in outcomes between phenotypes. DESIGN: Latent class analysis was used to identify phenotypes within a sample of HN fee‐for‐service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older using Medicare claims and post‐acute assessment data. SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: Two cross‐sectional cohorts were used to identify phenotypes. Cohorts included FFS Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who survived through 2014 (n = 415 659) and 2015 (n = 416 643). MEASUREMENTS: The following variables were used to identify phenotypes: acute and post‐acute care use, functional dependency in one or more activities of daily living, presence of six or more chronic conditions, and complex chronic conditions. Mortality, hospitalizations, healthcare expenditures, and days in the community were compared between phenotypes. RESULTS: Five phenotypes were identified: (1) comorbid ischemic heart disease with hospitalization and skilled nursing facility use (22% of the HN sample), (2) comorbid ischemic heart disease with home care use (23%), (3) home care use (12%), (4) high comorbidity with hospitalization (32%), and (5) Alzheimer's disease/related dementias with functional dependency and nursing home use (11%). Mortality was highest in phenotypes 1 and 2; hospitalizations and expenditures were highest in phenotypes 1, 3, and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a first step toward classifying the heterogeneity among HN Medicare beneficiaries. Further work is needed to identify modifiable utilization patterns between phenotypes to improve the value of healthcare provided to these subpopulations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:70–77, 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-08-27 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6952536/ /pubmed/31454082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16146 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Keeney, Tamra Belanger, Emmanuelle Jones, Rich N. Joyce, Nina R. Meyers, David J. Mor, Vincent High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title | High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title_full | High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title_fullStr | High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title_short | High‐Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes |
title_sort | high‐need phenotypes in medicare beneficiaries: drivers of variation in utilization and outcomes |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keeneytamra highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes AT belangeremmanuelle highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes AT jonesrichn highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes AT joyceninar highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes AT meyersdavidj highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes AT morvincent highneedphenotypesinmedicarebeneficiariesdriversofvariationinutilizationandoutcomes |