Cargando…

An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity

BACKGROUND: The release of dopamine (DA) has certain roles in the induction of conditioned place preference (CPP) and motor learning in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The aim of this study was to investigate the excitatory effects of DA through DA-D1 agonist (SKF38393) and elimination of the inhi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa, Alaei, Hojjatallah, Ghahremani, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_82_19
_version_ 1783486495715229696
author Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa
Alaei, Hojjatallah
Ghahremani, Parisa
author_facet Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa
Alaei, Hojjatallah
Ghahremani, Parisa
author_sort Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The release of dopamine (DA) has certain roles in the induction of conditioned place preference (CPP) and motor learning in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The aim of this study was to investigate the excitatory effects of DA through DA-D1 agonist (SKF38393) and elimination of the inhibitory effects of DA through DA-D2 antagonist (eticlopride) into the VTA and its synergistic effects with an ineffective dose of morphine in the induction of CPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Morphine (2.5 mg/kg; s. c.) did not induce a significant CPP, without any effect on the locomotor activity during the testing phase. SKF38393 (0.125, 0.5, and 1 μg/side) and eticlopride (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/side) individually or simultaneously were microinjected bilaterally into the VTA. RESULTS: The administration of SKF38393 (1 and 2 μg/rat) with ineffective morphine and also without morphine caused CPP on test day, while eticlopride (2 μg/rat) caused CPP with morphine only. Locomotor activity increased in groups receiving D1 agonist and D2 antagonist that presumed to be caused by the reinforcing effect. In addition, the concurrent administration of ineffective doses of D1 agonist and D2 antagonist into the VTA with ineffective morphine caused CPP but not with saline. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there was a need for morphine to activate the reward circuit through the D2 receptor in the VTA while the administration of the D1 agonist could independently activate the reward circuit. In addition, there was a probable synergistic effect using ineffective doses of D1 and D2 receptors, in the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6952765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69527652020-01-30 An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa Alaei, Hojjatallah Ghahremani, Parisa Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The release of dopamine (DA) has certain roles in the induction of conditioned place preference (CPP) and motor learning in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The aim of this study was to investigate the excitatory effects of DA through DA-D1 agonist (SKF38393) and elimination of the inhibitory effects of DA through DA-D2 antagonist (eticlopride) into the VTA and its synergistic effects with an ineffective dose of morphine in the induction of CPP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Morphine (2.5 mg/kg; s. c.) did not induce a significant CPP, without any effect on the locomotor activity during the testing phase. SKF38393 (0.125, 0.5, and 1 μg/side) and eticlopride (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/side) individually or simultaneously were microinjected bilaterally into the VTA. RESULTS: The administration of SKF38393 (1 and 2 μg/rat) with ineffective morphine and also without morphine caused CPP on test day, while eticlopride (2 μg/rat) caused CPP with morphine only. Locomotor activity increased in groups receiving D1 agonist and D2 antagonist that presumed to be caused by the reinforcing effect. In addition, the concurrent administration of ineffective doses of D1 agonist and D2 antagonist into the VTA with ineffective morphine caused CPP but not with saline. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there was a need for morphine to activate the reward circuit through the D2 receptor in the VTA while the administration of the D1 agonist could independently activate the reward circuit. In addition, there was a probable synergistic effect using ineffective doses of D1 and D2 receptors, in the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6952765/ /pubmed/32002395 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_82_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Advanced Biomedical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmadian, Seyed Mostafa
Alaei, Hojjatallah
Ghahremani, Parisa
An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title_full An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title_fullStr An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title_short An Assessment between D1 Receptor Agonist and D2 receptor Antagonist into the Ventral Tegmental Area on Conditioned Place Preference and Locomotor Activity
title_sort assessment between d1 receptor agonist and d2 receptor antagonist into the ventral tegmental area on conditioned place preference and locomotor activity
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32002395
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_82_19
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadianseyedmostafa anassessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity
AT alaeihojjatallah anassessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity
AT ghahremaniparisa anassessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity
AT ahmadianseyedmostafa assessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity
AT alaeihojjatallah assessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity
AT ghahremaniparisa assessmentbetweend1receptoragonistandd2receptorantagonistintotheventraltegmentalareaonconditionedplacepreferenceandlocomotoractivity