Cargando…

Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of decreasing tobacco use to achieve mortality reduction targets of the Sustainable Development Goals in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), evaluations of tobacco control programmes in these settings are scarce. We assessed the impacts of India’s Natio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nazar, Gaurang P, Chang, Kiara C-M, Srivastava, Swati, Pearce, Neil, Karan, Anup, Millett, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054621
_version_ 1783486514043289600
author Nazar, Gaurang P
Chang, Kiara C-M
Srivastava, Swati
Pearce, Neil
Karan, Anup
Millett, Christopher
author_facet Nazar, Gaurang P
Chang, Kiara C-M
Srivastava, Swati
Pearce, Neil
Karan, Anup
Millett, Christopher
author_sort Nazar, Gaurang P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of decreasing tobacco use to achieve mortality reduction targets of the Sustainable Development Goals in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), evaluations of tobacco control programmes in these settings are scarce. We assessed the impacts of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme (NTCP), as implemented in 42 districts during 2007–2009, on household-reported consumption of bidis and cigarettes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from nationally representative Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys (1999–2000; 2004–2005 and 2011–2012). Outcomes were: any bidi/cigarette consumption in the household and monthly consumption of bidi/cigarette sticks per person. A difference-in-differences two-part model was used to compare changes in bidi/cigarette consumption between NTCP intervention and control districts, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and time-based heterogeneity. FINDINGS: There was an overall decline in household-reported bidi and cigarette consumption between 1999–2000 and 2011–2012. However, compared with control districts, NTCP districts had no significantly different reductions in the proportions of households reporting bidi (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.28) or cigarette (AOR: 1.01 to 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.26) consumption, or for the monthly per person consumption of bidi (adjusted coefficient: 0.07, 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.28) or cigarette (adjusted coefficient: −0.002, 95% CI: −0.26 to 0.26) sticks among bidi/cigarette consuming households. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that early implementation of the NTCP may not have produced reductions in tobacco use reflecting generally poor performance against the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control objectives in India. This study highlights the importance of strengthening the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control policies in LMICs to achieve national and international child health and premature NCD mortality reduction targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6952846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69528462020-01-23 Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis Nazar, Gaurang P Chang, Kiara C-M Srivastava, Swati Pearce, Neil Karan, Anup Millett, Christopher Tob Control Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of decreasing tobacco use to achieve mortality reduction targets of the Sustainable Development Goals in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), evaluations of tobacco control programmes in these settings are scarce. We assessed the impacts of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme (NTCP), as implemented in 42 districts during 2007–2009, on household-reported consumption of bidis and cigarettes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from nationally representative Household Consumer Expenditure Surveys (1999–2000; 2004–2005 and 2011–2012). Outcomes were: any bidi/cigarette consumption in the household and monthly consumption of bidi/cigarette sticks per person. A difference-in-differences two-part model was used to compare changes in bidi/cigarette consumption between NTCP intervention and control districts, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and time-based heterogeneity. FINDINGS: There was an overall decline in household-reported bidi and cigarette consumption between 1999–2000 and 2011–2012. However, compared with control districts, NTCP districts had no significantly different reductions in the proportions of households reporting bidi (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.28) or cigarette (AOR: 1.01 to 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.26) consumption, or for the monthly per person consumption of bidi (adjusted coefficient: 0.07, 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.28) or cigarette (adjusted coefficient: −0.002, 95% CI: −0.26 to 0.26) sticks among bidi/cigarette consuming households. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that early implementation of the NTCP may not have produced reductions in tobacco use reflecting generally poor performance against the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control objectives in India. This study highlights the importance of strengthening the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control policies in LMICs to achieve national and international child health and premature NCD mortality reduction targets. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01 2018-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6952846/ /pubmed/30554161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054621 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nazar, Gaurang P
Chang, Kiara C-M
Srivastava, Swati
Pearce, Neil
Karan, Anup
Millett, Christopher
Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_full Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_fullStr Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_short Impact of India’s National Tobacco Control Programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
title_sort impact of india’s national tobacco control programme on bidi and cigarette consumption: a difference-in-differences analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054621
work_keys_str_mv AT nazargaurangp impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT changkiaracm impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT srivastavaswati impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT pearceneil impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT karananup impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT millettchristopher impactofindiasnationaltobaccocontrolprogrammeonbidiandcigaretteconsumptionadifferenceindifferencesanalysis