Cargando…
MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572 |
_version_ | 1783486538816946176 |
---|---|
author | Barraclough, Jennifer Y. Joan, Michelyn Joglekar, Mugdha V. Hardikar, Anandwardhan A. Patel, Sanjay |
author_facet | Barraclough, Jennifer Y. Joan, Michelyn Joglekar, Mugdha V. Hardikar, Anandwardhan A. Patel, Sanjay |
author_sort | Barraclough, Jennifer Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing their diagnostic and prognostic potential. This systematic review sought to determine whether existing literature supports the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers after an Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presentation. Methods: A systematic review of published articles from 2005–2019 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken independently by two reviewers. Studies addressing prognosis in an ACS population yielded 32 studies and 2 systematic reviews. Results/conclusion: 23 prospective studies reported significant differences in miRNA levels and 16 compared the predictive power of miRNAs. The most common miRNAs assessed included miR-133a, -208b, -21, -1, -34a, -150, and -423, shown to be involved in cell differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Barriers to the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers include bias in miRNA selection, small sample size, variable normalization of data, and adjustment for confounders. Therefore, findings from this systematic review do not support the use of miRNAs for prognostication post-ACS beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, existing risk scores, and stratifications tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6952952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69529522020-01-23 MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review Barraclough, Jennifer Y. Joan, Michelyn Joglekar, Mugdha V. Hardikar, Anandwardhan A. Patel, Sanjay Cells Review Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing their diagnostic and prognostic potential. This systematic review sought to determine whether existing literature supports the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers after an Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presentation. Methods: A systematic review of published articles from 2005–2019 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken independently by two reviewers. Studies addressing prognosis in an ACS population yielded 32 studies and 2 systematic reviews. Results/conclusion: 23 prospective studies reported significant differences in miRNA levels and 16 compared the predictive power of miRNAs. The most common miRNAs assessed included miR-133a, -208b, -21, -1, -34a, -150, and -423, shown to be involved in cell differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Barriers to the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers include bias in miRNA selection, small sample size, variable normalization of data, and adjustment for confounders. Therefore, findings from this systematic review do not support the use of miRNAs for prognostication post-ACS beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, existing risk scores, and stratifications tools. MDPI 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6952952/ /pubmed/31817254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Barraclough, Jennifer Y. Joan, Michelyn Joglekar, Mugdha V. Hardikar, Anandwardhan A. Patel, Sanjay MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title | MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title_full | MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title_short | MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | micrornas as prognostic markers in acute coronary syndrome patients—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barracloughjennifery micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview AT joanmichelyn micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview AT joglekarmugdhav micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview AT hardikaranandwardhana micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview AT patelsanjay micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview |