Cargando…

MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review

Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barraclough, Jennifer Y., Joan, Michelyn, Joglekar, Mugdha V., Hardikar, Anandwardhan A., Patel, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572
_version_ 1783486538816946176
author Barraclough, Jennifer Y.
Joan, Michelyn
Joglekar, Mugdha V.
Hardikar, Anandwardhan A.
Patel, Sanjay
author_facet Barraclough, Jennifer Y.
Joan, Michelyn
Joglekar, Mugdha V.
Hardikar, Anandwardhan A.
Patel, Sanjay
author_sort Barraclough, Jennifer Y.
collection PubMed
description Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing their diagnostic and prognostic potential. This systematic review sought to determine whether existing literature supports the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers after an Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presentation. Methods: A systematic review of published articles from 2005–2019 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken independently by two reviewers. Studies addressing prognosis in an ACS population yielded 32 studies and 2 systematic reviews. Results/conclusion: 23 prospective studies reported significant differences in miRNA levels and 16 compared the predictive power of miRNAs. The most common miRNAs assessed included miR-133a, -208b, -21, -1, -34a, -150, and -423, shown to be involved in cell differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Barriers to the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers include bias in miRNA selection, small sample size, variable normalization of data, and adjustment for confounders. Therefore, findings from this systematic review do not support the use of miRNAs for prognostication post-ACS beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, existing risk scores, and stratifications tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6952952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69529522020-01-23 MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review Barraclough, Jennifer Y. Joan, Michelyn Joglekar, Mugdha V. Hardikar, Anandwardhan A. Patel, Sanjay Cells Review Background: The potential utility of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of multiple disease states has been an area of great interest since their discovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, there is a large pool of literature amassed from the last decade assessing their diagnostic and prognostic potential. This systematic review sought to determine whether existing literature supports the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers after an Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) presentation. Methods: A systematic review of published articles from 2005–2019 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken independently by two reviewers. Studies addressing prognosis in an ACS population yielded 32 studies and 2 systematic reviews. Results/conclusion: 23 prospective studies reported significant differences in miRNA levels and 16 compared the predictive power of miRNAs. The most common miRNAs assessed included miR-133a, -208b, -21, -1, -34a, -150, and -423, shown to be involved in cell differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Barriers to the use of miRNAs as prognostic markers include bias in miRNA selection, small sample size, variable normalization of data, and adjustment for confounders. Therefore, findings from this systematic review do not support the use of miRNAs for prognostication post-ACS beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, existing risk scores, and stratifications tools. MDPI 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6952952/ /pubmed/31817254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Barraclough, Jennifer Y.
Joan, Michelyn
Joglekar, Mugdha V.
Hardikar, Anandwardhan A.
Patel, Sanjay
MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title_full MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title_short MicroRNAs as Prognostic Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients—A Systematic Review
title_sort micrornas as prognostic markers in acute coronary syndrome patients—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6952952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31817254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8121572
work_keys_str_mv AT barracloughjennifery micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview
AT joanmichelyn micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview
AT joglekarmugdhav micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview
AT hardikaranandwardhana micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview
AT patelsanjay micrornasasprognosticmarkersinacutecoronarysyndromepatientsasystematicreview