Cargando…
Can prospective systematic reviews of animal studies improve clinical translation?
Systematic reviews are powerful tools with the potential to generate high quality evidence. Their application to animal studies has been instrumental in exposing the poor quality of these studies, as well as a catalyst for improvements in study design, conduct and reporting. It has been suggested th...
Autores principales: | Pound, Pandora, Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02205-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is it possible to overcome issues of external validity in preclinical animal research? Why most animal models are bound to fail
por: Pound, Pandora, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The impact of conducting preclinical systematic reviews on researchers and their research: A mixed method case study
por: Menon, Julia M. L., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
por: Hooijmans, C. R., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
How Can Systematic Reviews Teach Us More about the Implementation of the 3Rs and Animal Welfare?
por: Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Improving planning, design, reporting and scientific quality of animal experiments by using the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, in addition to the ARRIVE guidelines
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2011)