Cargando…

Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?

BACKGROUND: An appropriate method of anastomosis is crucial for gastric cancer patients who require gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surgeons have proposed different types of modified gastrojejunostomies in the last two decades. We focused on two types of standard anastomosis, i.e., Uncut Roux-Y and Roux-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sah, B. K., Li, J., Yan, C., Li, C., Yan, M., Zhu, Z. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0672-8
_version_ 1783486581886156800
author Sah, B. K.
Li, J.
Yan, C.
Li, C.
Yan, M.
Zhu, Z. G.
author_facet Sah, B. K.
Li, J.
Yan, C.
Li, C.
Yan, M.
Zhu, Z. G.
author_sort Sah, B. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An appropriate method of anastomosis is crucial for gastric cancer patients who require gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surgeons have proposed different types of modified gastrojejunostomies in the last two decades. We focused on two types of standard anastomosis, i.e., Uncut Roux-Y and Roux-Y gastrojejunostomies, and compared the differences in immediate postoperative complications between the two types. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on 236 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy with gastrojejunal Roux-Y or Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis for six consecutive years. Immediate postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The authors discussed the causes of the significant complications and their management. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographics between the two groups (92 Roux-y Versus 144 Uncut Roux-y). The overall complication rate was 20.8% with 1.4% anastomotic leakage in the Uncut Roux-Y group versus 33.7% with 7.6% anastomotic failures in the Roux-Y group (p < 0.05). More abdominal infections occurred in the Roux-Y anastomosis group compared with the Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis group (p < 0.05). Duration of postoperative stay was significantly longer in patients with Roux-y anastomosis group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the surgical simplicity and postoperative complications, the Uncut Roux-Y is a better choice for anastomosis in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrojejunostomy. A well-designed large cohort in a multi-centre randomized controlled trial is necessary to support these findings and compare other aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69531352020-01-14 Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y? Sah, B. K. Li, J. Yan, C. Li, C. Yan, M. Zhu, Z. G. BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: An appropriate method of anastomosis is crucial for gastric cancer patients who require gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surgeons have proposed different types of modified gastrojejunostomies in the last two decades. We focused on two types of standard anastomosis, i.e., Uncut Roux-Y and Roux-Y gastrojejunostomies, and compared the differences in immediate postoperative complications between the two types. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on 236 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy with gastrojejunal Roux-Y or Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis for six consecutive years. Immediate postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The authors discussed the causes of the significant complications and their management. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographics between the two groups (92 Roux-y Versus 144 Uncut Roux-y). The overall complication rate was 20.8% with 1.4% anastomotic leakage in the Uncut Roux-Y group versus 33.7% with 7.6% anastomotic failures in the Roux-Y group (p < 0.05). More abdominal infections occurred in the Roux-Y anastomosis group compared with the Uncut Roux-Y anastomosis group (p < 0.05). Duration of postoperative stay was significantly longer in patients with Roux-y anastomosis group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the surgical simplicity and postoperative complications, the Uncut Roux-Y is a better choice for anastomosis in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrojejunostomy. A well-designed large cohort in a multi-centre randomized controlled trial is necessary to support these findings and compare other aspects. BioMed Central 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6953135/ /pubmed/31918683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0672-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sah, B. K.
Li, J.
Yan, C.
Li, C.
Yan, M.
Zhu, Z. G.
Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title_full Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title_fullStr Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title_full_unstemmed Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title_short Anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in Chinese patients: uncut roux-Y or roux-Y?
title_sort anastomosis for distal gastrectomy in chinese patients: uncut roux-y or roux-y?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0672-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sahbk anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy
AT lij anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy
AT yanc anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy
AT lic anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy
AT yanm anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy
AT zhuzg anastomosisfordistalgastrectomyinchinesepatientsuncutrouxyorrouxy