Cargando…
Does isolated atlantoaxial fusion result in better clinical outcome compared to occipitocervical fusion?
BACKGROUND: The C0 to C2 region is the keystone for range of motion in the upper cervical spine. Posterior procedures usually include a fusion of at least one segment. Atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) only inhibits any motion in the C1/C2 segment whereas occipitocervical fusion (OCF) additionally interfere...
Autores principales: | Wenning, Katharina E., Hoffmann, Martin F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1525-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fusion in treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures
por: Hu, Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Influence of Atlantoaxial Fusion on Sagittal Alignment of the Occipitocervical and Subaxial spines in Os Odontoideum with Atlantoaxial Instability
por: Choi, Byung-Wan, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Correlation of Posterior Occipitocervical Angle and Surgical Outcomes for Occipitocervical Fusion
por: Maulucci, Christopher M., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Importance of the Occipitoaxial Angle and Posterior Occipitocervical Angle in Occipitocervical Fusion
por: Tang, Chao, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Posterior Instrumentation for Occipitocervical Fusion
por: Sapkas, George, et al.
Publicado: (2011)