Cargando…
Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food security: protocol for a methodological study
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews should specify all outcomes at the protocol stage. Pre-specification helps prevent outcome choice from being influenced by knowledge of included study results. Completely specified outcomes comprise five elements: (1) domain (title), (2) specific measurement (technique...
Autores principales: | Durão, Solange, Visser, Marianne, Kredo, Tamara, Saldanha, Ian J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1268-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Indigenous Community-Led Programs to Address Food and Water Security: Protocol for a Systematic Review
por: Hart, Ashleigh Chanel, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Screening strategies for hypertension: a systematic review protocol
por: Schmidt, Bey-Marrié, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Impact of COVID-19 on the food security and identifying the compromised food security dimension: A systematic review protocol
por: Gebeyehu, Daniel Teshome, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Screening strategies for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol
por: Mearns, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability
por: Saldanha, Ian J., et al.
Publicado: (2014)