Cargando…

Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model

BACKGROUND: Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obst, Kate Louise, Due, Clemence, Oxlad, Melissa, Middleton, Philippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9
_version_ 1783486607919153152
author Obst, Kate Louise
Due, Clemence
Oxlad, Melissa
Middleton, Philippa
author_facet Obst, Kate Louise
Due, Clemence
Oxlad, Melissa
Middleton, Philippa
author_sort Obst, Kate Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. RESULTS: A final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. CONCLUSION: There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018103981
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69532752020-01-14 Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model Obst, Kate Louise Due, Clemence Oxlad, Melissa Middleton, Philippa BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Emotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men’s grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men’s grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men’s experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men’s grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men’s grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth. RESULTS: A final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men’s grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience. CONCLUSION: There is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men’s grief. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018103981 BioMed Central 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6953275/ /pubmed/31918681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Obst, Kate Louise
Due, Clemence
Oxlad, Melissa
Middleton, Philippa
Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title_full Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title_fullStr Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title_full_unstemmed Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title_short Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
title_sort men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31918681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9
work_keys_str_mv AT obstkatelouise mensgrieffollowingpregnancylossandneonatallossasystematicreviewandemergingtheoreticalmodel
AT dueclemence mensgrieffollowingpregnancylossandneonatallossasystematicreviewandemergingtheoreticalmodel
AT oxladmelissa mensgrieffollowingpregnancylossandneonatallossasystematicreviewandemergingtheoreticalmodel
AT middletonphilippa mensgrieffollowingpregnancylossandneonatallossasystematicreviewandemergingtheoreticalmodel