Cargando…

Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review

Background: Some evidence suggests environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) might cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We reviewed available epidemiological data in never smokers. Methods: We identified epidemiological studies providing estimates of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Peter N., Forey, Barbara A., Coombs, Katharine J., Hamling, Jan S., Thornton, Alison J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13887.3
_version_ 1783486621322051584
author Lee, Peter N.
Forey, Barbara A.
Coombs, Katharine J.
Hamling, Jan S.
Thornton, Alison J.
author_facet Lee, Peter N.
Forey, Barbara A.
Coombs, Katharine J.
Hamling, Jan S.
Thornton, Alison J.
author_sort Lee, Peter N.
collection PubMed
description Background: Some evidence suggests environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) might cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We reviewed available epidemiological data in never smokers. Methods: We identified epidemiological studies providing estimates of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for various ETS exposure indices. Confounder-adjusted RRs for COPD were extracted, or derived using standard methods. Meta-analyses were conducted for each exposure index, with tests for heterogeneity and publication bias. For the main index (spouse ever smoked or nearest equivalent), analyses investigated variation in RR by location, publication period, study type, sex, diagnosis, study size, confounder adjustment, never smoker definition, and exposure index definition. Results: Twenty-eight relevant studies were identified; nine European or Middle Eastern, nine Asian, eight American and two from multiple countries. Five were prospective, seven case-control and 16 cross-sectional. The COPD definition involved death or hospitalisation in seven studies, GOLD stage 1+ criteria in twelve, and other definitions in nine. For the main index, random-effects meta-analysis of 33 heterogeneous (p<0.001) estimates gave a RR of 1.20 (95%CI 1.08-1.34). Higher estimates for females (1.59,1.16-2.19, n=11) than males (1.29,0.94-1.76, n=7) or sexes combined (1.10,0.99-1.22, n=15 where sex-specific not available), and lower estimates for studies of 150+ cases (1.08,0.97-1.20, n=13) partly explained the heterogeneity. Estimates were higher for Asian studies (1.34,1.08-1.67, n=10), case-control studies (1.55,1.04-2.32, n=8), and COPD mortality or hospitalisation (1.40,1.12-1.74, n=11). Some increase was seen for severer COPD (1.29,1.10-1.52, n=7). Dose-response evidence was heterogeneous. Evidence for childhood (0.88,0.72-1.07, n=2) and workplace (1.12,0.77-1.64, n=4) exposure was limited, but an increase was seen for overall adulthood exposure (1.20,1.03-1.39, n=17). We discuss study weaknesses that may bias estimation of the association of COPD with ETS. Conclusions: Although the evidence strongly suggests that ETS increases COPD, study weaknesses and absence of well-designed large studies preclude reliable effect estimation. More definitive evidence is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69534252020-02-20 Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review Lee, Peter N. Forey, Barbara A. Coombs, Katharine J. Hamling, Jan S. Thornton, Alison J. F1000Res Systematic Review Background: Some evidence suggests environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) might cause chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We reviewed available epidemiological data in never smokers. Methods: We identified epidemiological studies providing estimates of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for various ETS exposure indices. Confounder-adjusted RRs for COPD were extracted, or derived using standard methods. Meta-analyses were conducted for each exposure index, with tests for heterogeneity and publication bias. For the main index (spouse ever smoked or nearest equivalent), analyses investigated variation in RR by location, publication period, study type, sex, diagnosis, study size, confounder adjustment, never smoker definition, and exposure index definition. Results: Twenty-eight relevant studies were identified; nine European or Middle Eastern, nine Asian, eight American and two from multiple countries. Five were prospective, seven case-control and 16 cross-sectional. The COPD definition involved death or hospitalisation in seven studies, GOLD stage 1+ criteria in twelve, and other definitions in nine. For the main index, random-effects meta-analysis of 33 heterogeneous (p<0.001) estimates gave a RR of 1.20 (95%CI 1.08-1.34). Higher estimates for females (1.59,1.16-2.19, n=11) than males (1.29,0.94-1.76, n=7) or sexes combined (1.10,0.99-1.22, n=15 where sex-specific not available), and lower estimates for studies of 150+ cases (1.08,0.97-1.20, n=13) partly explained the heterogeneity. Estimates were higher for Asian studies (1.34,1.08-1.67, n=10), case-control studies (1.55,1.04-2.32, n=8), and COPD mortality or hospitalisation (1.40,1.12-1.74, n=11). Some increase was seen for severer COPD (1.29,1.10-1.52, n=7). Dose-response evidence was heterogeneous. Evidence for childhood (0.88,0.72-1.07, n=2) and workplace (1.12,0.77-1.64, n=4) exposure was limited, but an increase was seen for overall adulthood exposure (1.20,1.03-1.39, n=17). We discuss study weaknesses that may bias estimation of the association of COPD with ETS. Conclusions: Although the evidence strongly suggests that ETS increases COPD, study weaknesses and absence of well-designed large studies preclude reliable effect estimation. More definitive evidence is required. F1000 Research Limited 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6953425/ /pubmed/32089819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13887.3 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Lee PN et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lee, Peter N.
Forey, Barbara A.
Coombs, Katharine J.
Hamling, Jan S.
Thornton, Alison J.
Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title_full Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title_fullStr Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title_short Epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to COPD in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
title_sort epidemiological evidence relating environmental smoke to copd in lifelong non-smokers: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089819
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13887.3
work_keys_str_mv AT leepetern epidemiologicalevidencerelatingenvironmentalsmoketocopdinlifelongnonsmokersasystematicreview
AT foreybarbaraa epidemiologicalevidencerelatingenvironmentalsmoketocopdinlifelongnonsmokersasystematicreview
AT coombskatharinej epidemiologicalevidencerelatingenvironmentalsmoketocopdinlifelongnonsmokersasystematicreview
AT hamlingjans epidemiologicalevidencerelatingenvironmentalsmoketocopdinlifelongnonsmokersasystematicreview
AT thorntonalisonj epidemiologicalevidencerelatingenvironmentalsmoketocopdinlifelongnonsmokersasystematicreview