Cargando…
Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909 |
_version_ | 1783486647736729600 |
---|---|
author | Hofmann, Sylvia Baniya, Chitra B. Litvinchuk, Spartak N. Miehe, Georg Li, Jia‐Tang Schmidt, Joachim |
author_facet | Hofmann, Sylvia Baniya, Chitra B. Litvinchuk, Spartak N. Miehe, Georg Li, Jia‐Tang Schmidt, Joachim |
author_sort | Hofmann, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to explore alternative biogeographic scenarios for their origin in the Greater Himalaya, namely, immigration, South Tibetan origin, strict vicariance. We sequenced 150 Nanorana samples from 62 localities for three mitochondrial (1,524 bp) and three nuclear markers (2,043 bp) and complemented the data with sequence data available from GenBank. We reconstructed a gene tree, phylogenetic networks, and ancestral areas. Based on the nuDNA, we also generated a time‐calibrated species tree. The results revealed two major clades (Nanorana and Quasipaa), which originated in the Lower Miocene from eastern China and subsequently spread into the HTO (Nanorana). Five well‐supported subclades are found within Nanorana: from the East, Central, and Northwest Himalaya, the Tibetan Plateau, and the southeastern Plateau margin. The latter subclade represents the most basal group (subgenus Chaparana), the Plateau group (Nanorana) represents the sister clade to all species of the Greater Himalaya (Paa). We found no evidence for an east–west range expansion of Paa along the Himalaya, nor clear support for a strict vicariance model. Diversification in each of the three Himalayan subclades has probably occurred in distinct areas. Specimens from the NW Himalaya are placed basally relative to the highly diverse Central Himalayan group, while the lineage from the Tibetan Plateau is placed within a more terminal clade. Our data indicate a Tibetan origin of Himalayan Nanorana and support a previous hypothesis, which implies that a significant part of the Himalayan biodiversity results from primary diversification of the species groups in South Tibet before this part of the HTO was uplifted to its recent heights. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6953589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69535892020-01-14 Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group Hofmann, Sylvia Baniya, Chitra B. Litvinchuk, Spartak N. Miehe, Georg Li, Jia‐Tang Schmidt, Joachim Ecol Evol Original Research Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to explore alternative biogeographic scenarios for their origin in the Greater Himalaya, namely, immigration, South Tibetan origin, strict vicariance. We sequenced 150 Nanorana samples from 62 localities for three mitochondrial (1,524 bp) and three nuclear markers (2,043 bp) and complemented the data with sequence data available from GenBank. We reconstructed a gene tree, phylogenetic networks, and ancestral areas. Based on the nuDNA, we also generated a time‐calibrated species tree. The results revealed two major clades (Nanorana and Quasipaa), which originated in the Lower Miocene from eastern China and subsequently spread into the HTO (Nanorana). Five well‐supported subclades are found within Nanorana: from the East, Central, and Northwest Himalaya, the Tibetan Plateau, and the southeastern Plateau margin. The latter subclade represents the most basal group (subgenus Chaparana), the Plateau group (Nanorana) represents the sister clade to all species of the Greater Himalaya (Paa). We found no evidence for an east–west range expansion of Paa along the Himalaya, nor clear support for a strict vicariance model. Diversification in each of the three Himalayan subclades has probably occurred in distinct areas. Specimens from the NW Himalaya are placed basally relative to the highly diverse Central Himalayan group, while the lineage from the Tibetan Plateau is placed within a more terminal clade. Our data indicate a Tibetan origin of Himalayan Nanorana and support a previous hypothesis, which implies that a significant part of the Himalayan biodiversity results from primary diversification of the species groups in South Tibet before this part of the HTO was uplifted to its recent heights. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6953589/ /pubmed/31938536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hofmann, Sylvia Baniya, Chitra B. Litvinchuk, Spartak N. Miehe, Georg Li, Jia‐Tang Schmidt, Joachim Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title | Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title_full | Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title_fullStr | Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title_full_unstemmed | Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title_short | Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group |
title_sort | phylogeny of spiny frogs nanorana (anura: dicroglossidae) supports a tibetan origin of a himalayan species group |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmannsylvia phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup AT baniyachitrab phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup AT litvinchukspartakn phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup AT miehegeorg phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup AT lijiatang phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup AT schmidtjoachim phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup |