Cargando…

Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group

Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmann, Sylvia, Baniya, Chitra B., Litvinchuk, Spartak N., Miehe, Georg, Li, Jia‐Tang, Schmidt, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909
_version_ 1783486647736729600
author Hofmann, Sylvia
Baniya, Chitra B.
Litvinchuk, Spartak N.
Miehe, Georg
Li, Jia‐Tang
Schmidt, Joachim
author_facet Hofmann, Sylvia
Baniya, Chitra B.
Litvinchuk, Spartak N.
Miehe, Georg
Li, Jia‐Tang
Schmidt, Joachim
author_sort Hofmann, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to explore alternative biogeographic scenarios for their origin in the Greater Himalaya, namely, immigration, South Tibetan origin, strict vicariance. We sequenced 150 Nanorana samples from 62 localities for three mitochondrial (1,524 bp) and three nuclear markers (2,043 bp) and complemented the data with sequence data available from GenBank. We reconstructed a gene tree, phylogenetic networks, and ancestral areas. Based on the nuDNA, we also generated a time‐calibrated species tree. The results revealed two major clades (Nanorana and Quasipaa), which originated in the Lower Miocene from eastern China and subsequently spread into the HTO (Nanorana). Five well‐supported subclades are found within Nanorana: from the East, Central, and Northwest Himalaya, the Tibetan Plateau, and the southeastern Plateau margin. The latter subclade represents the most basal group (subgenus Chaparana), the Plateau group (Nanorana) represents the sister clade to all species of the Greater Himalaya (Paa). We found no evidence for an east–west range expansion of Paa along the Himalaya, nor clear support for a strict vicariance model. Diversification in each of the three Himalayan subclades has probably occurred in distinct areas. Specimens from the NW Himalaya are placed basally relative to the highly diverse Central Himalayan group, while the lineage from the Tibetan Plateau is placed within a more terminal clade. Our data indicate a Tibetan origin of Himalayan Nanorana and support a previous hypothesis, which implies that a significant part of the Himalayan biodiversity results from primary diversification of the species groups in South Tibet before this part of the HTO was uplifted to its recent heights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69535892020-01-14 Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group Hofmann, Sylvia Baniya, Chitra B. Litvinchuk, Spartak N. Miehe, Georg Li, Jia‐Tang Schmidt, Joachim Ecol Evol Original Research Recent advances in the understanding of the evolution of the Asian continent challenge the long‐held belief of a faunal immigration into the Himalaya. Spiny frogs of the genus Nanorana are a characteristic faunal group of the Himalaya–Tibet orogen (HTO). We examine the phylogeny of these frogs to explore alternative biogeographic scenarios for their origin in the Greater Himalaya, namely, immigration, South Tibetan origin, strict vicariance. We sequenced 150 Nanorana samples from 62 localities for three mitochondrial (1,524 bp) and three nuclear markers (2,043 bp) and complemented the data with sequence data available from GenBank. We reconstructed a gene tree, phylogenetic networks, and ancestral areas. Based on the nuDNA, we also generated a time‐calibrated species tree. The results revealed two major clades (Nanorana and Quasipaa), which originated in the Lower Miocene from eastern China and subsequently spread into the HTO (Nanorana). Five well‐supported subclades are found within Nanorana: from the East, Central, and Northwest Himalaya, the Tibetan Plateau, and the southeastern Plateau margin. The latter subclade represents the most basal group (subgenus Chaparana), the Plateau group (Nanorana) represents the sister clade to all species of the Greater Himalaya (Paa). We found no evidence for an east–west range expansion of Paa along the Himalaya, nor clear support for a strict vicariance model. Diversification in each of the three Himalayan subclades has probably occurred in distinct areas. Specimens from the NW Himalaya are placed basally relative to the highly diverse Central Himalayan group, while the lineage from the Tibetan Plateau is placed within a more terminal clade. Our data indicate a Tibetan origin of Himalayan Nanorana and support a previous hypothesis, which implies that a significant part of the Himalayan biodiversity results from primary diversification of the species groups in South Tibet before this part of the HTO was uplifted to its recent heights. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6953589/ /pubmed/31938536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hofmann, Sylvia
Baniya, Chitra B.
Litvinchuk, Spartak N.
Miehe, Georg
Li, Jia‐Tang
Schmidt, Joachim
Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title_full Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title_fullStr Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title_full_unstemmed Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title_short Phylogeny of spiny frogs Nanorana (Anura: Dicroglossidae) supports a Tibetan origin of a Himalayan species group
title_sort phylogeny of spiny frogs nanorana (anura: dicroglossidae) supports a tibetan origin of a himalayan species group
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5909
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmannsylvia phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup
AT baniyachitrab phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup
AT litvinchukspartakn phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup
AT miehegeorg phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup
AT lijiatang phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup
AT schmidtjoachim phylogenyofspinyfrogsnanoranaanuradicroglossidaesupportsatibetanoriginofahimalayanspeciesgroup