Cargando…

Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies

BACKGROUND: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srikandarajah, Nisaharan, Noble, Adam, Clark, Simon, Wilby, Martin, Freeman, Brian J. C., Fehlings, Michael G., Williamson, Paula R., Marson, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31923259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225907
_version_ 1783486671232172032
author Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Noble, Adam
Clark, Simon
Wilby, Martin
Freeman, Brian J. C.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Williamson, Paula R.
Marson, Tony
author_facet Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Noble, Adam
Clark, Simon
Wilby, Martin
Freeman, Brian J. C.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Williamson, Paula R.
Marson, Tony
author_sort Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area. There is significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting for CES, which does not allow data synthesis between studies. The hypothesis is that a COS for CES can be developed for future research studies using patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as key stakeholders. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with CES patients were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo to identify the outcomes of importance. These were combined with the outcomes obtained from a published systematic literature review of CES patients. The outcomes were grouped into a list of 37, for rating through two rounds of an international Delphi survey according to pre-set criteria. The Delphi survey had an overall response rate of 63% and included 172 participants (104 patients, 68 HCPs) from 14 countries who completed both rounds. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus at the end of the Delphi survey and there was no attrition bias detected. The results were discussed at an international consensus meeting attended by 34 key stakeholders (16 patients and 18 HCPs) from 8 countries. A further three outcomes were agreed to be included. There was no selection bias detected at the consensus meeting. There are 16 outcomes in total in the CESCOS. DISCUSSION: This is the first study in the literature that has determined the core outcomes in CES using a transparent international consensus process involving healthcare professionals and CES patients as key stakeholders. This COS is recommended as the most important outcomes to be reported in any research study investigating CES outcomes and will allow evidence synthesis in CES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69537622020-01-21 Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Noble, Adam Clark, Simon Wilby, Martin Freeman, Brian J. C. Fehlings, Michael G. Williamson, Paula R. Marson, Tony PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area. There is significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting for CES, which does not allow data synthesis between studies. The hypothesis is that a COS for CES can be developed for future research studies using patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as key stakeholders. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with CES patients were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo to identify the outcomes of importance. These were combined with the outcomes obtained from a published systematic literature review of CES patients. The outcomes were grouped into a list of 37, for rating through two rounds of an international Delphi survey according to pre-set criteria. The Delphi survey had an overall response rate of 63% and included 172 participants (104 patients, 68 HCPs) from 14 countries who completed both rounds. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus at the end of the Delphi survey and there was no attrition bias detected. The results were discussed at an international consensus meeting attended by 34 key stakeholders (16 patients and 18 HCPs) from 8 countries. A further three outcomes were agreed to be included. There was no selection bias detected at the consensus meeting. There are 16 outcomes in total in the CESCOS. DISCUSSION: This is the first study in the literature that has determined the core outcomes in CES using a transparent international consensus process involving healthcare professionals and CES patients as key stakeholders. This COS is recommended as the most important outcomes to be reported in any research study investigating CES outcomes and will allow evidence synthesis in CES. Public Library of Science 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6953762/ /pubmed/31923259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225907 Text en © 2020 Srikandarajah et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Noble, Adam
Clark, Simon
Wilby, Martin
Freeman, Brian J. C.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Williamson, Paula R.
Marson, Tony
Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title_full Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title_fullStr Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title_full_unstemmed Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title_short Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
title_sort cauda equina syndrome core outcome set (cescos): an international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31923259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225907
work_keys_str_mv AT srikandarajahnisaharan caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT nobleadam caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT clarksimon caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT wilbymartin caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT freemanbrianjc caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT fehlingsmichaelg caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT williamsonpaular caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies
AT marsontony caudaequinasyndromecoreoutcomesetcescosaninternationalpatientandhealthcareprofessionalconsensusforresearchstudies