Cargando…
Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Republic of Macedonia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696 |
_version_ | 1783486704217227264 |
---|---|
author | Golvankar, Kapil Kader, Mohammed Abdul Latheef, Abhilash Abdul Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Abullais, Shahabe Saquib Sibagathullah, Mohammed |
author_facet | Golvankar, Kapil Kader, Mohammed Abdul Latheef, Abhilash Abdul Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Abullais, Shahabe Saquib Sibagathullah, Mohammed |
author_sort | Golvankar, Kapil |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coronal plane was prepared. Actual working length (AL) was measured using a stereomicroscope under 8X magnification. Electronic working length measurements were recorded using Root ZX (EL1) and Elements Diagnostic Unit (EL2) apex locators. One-way ANOVA test was carried out to analyse the data among the experimental groups. RESULTS: The results of the one-way ANOVA test showed that difference in the working length determined by either apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. The independent ‘t’ test comparing between groups EL1 and AL; and EL2 and AL showed that working length determined by either of the apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, the Root ZX and Elements Diagnostic Unit apex locators are equally accurate for determination of working length when compared to actual working length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6953924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Republic of Macedonia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69539242020-01-16 Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study Golvankar, Kapil Kader, Mohammed Abdul Latheef, Abhilash Abdul Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Abullais, Shahabe Saquib Sibagathullah, Mohammed Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coronal plane was prepared. Actual working length (AL) was measured using a stereomicroscope under 8X magnification. Electronic working length measurements were recorded using Root ZX (EL1) and Elements Diagnostic Unit (EL2) apex locators. One-way ANOVA test was carried out to analyse the data among the experimental groups. RESULTS: The results of the one-way ANOVA test showed that difference in the working length determined by either apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. The independent ‘t’ test comparing between groups EL1 and AL; and EL2 and AL showed that working length determined by either of the apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, the Root ZX and Elements Diagnostic Unit apex locators are equally accurate for determination of working length when compared to actual working length. Republic of Macedonia 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6953924/ /pubmed/31949530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Kapil Golvankar, Mohammed Abdul Kader, Abhilash Abdul Latheef, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Ali, Shahabe Saquib Abullais, Mohammed Sibagathullah. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Dental Science Golvankar, Kapil Kader, Mohammed Abdul Latheef, Abhilash Abdul Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Abullais, Shahabe Saquib Sibagathullah, Mohammed Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of accuracy in determining the root canal working length by using two generations of apex locators – an in vitro study |
topic | Dental Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golvankarkapil comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy AT kadermohammedabdul comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy AT latheefabhilashabdul comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy AT aliahamedbabikermohammed comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy AT abullaisshahabesaquib comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy AT sibagathullahmohammed comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy |