Cargando…

Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study

AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golvankar, Kapil, Kader, Mohammed Abdul, Latheef, Abhilash Abdul, Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed, Abullais, Shahabe Saquib, Sibagathullah, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696
_version_ 1783486704217227264
author Golvankar, Kapil
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Latheef, Abhilash Abdul
Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed
Abullais, Shahabe Saquib
Sibagathullah, Mohammed
author_facet Golvankar, Kapil
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Latheef, Abhilash Abdul
Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed
Abullais, Shahabe Saquib
Sibagathullah, Mohammed
author_sort Golvankar, Kapil
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coronal plane was prepared. Actual working length (AL) was measured using a stereomicroscope under 8X magnification. Electronic working length measurements were recorded using Root ZX (EL1) and Elements Diagnostic Unit (EL2) apex locators. One-way ANOVA test was carried out to analyse the data among the experimental groups. RESULTS: The results of the one-way ANOVA test showed that difference in the working length determined by either apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. The independent ‘t’ test comparing between groups EL1 and AL; and EL2 and AL showed that working length determined by either of the apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, the Root ZX and Elements Diagnostic Unit apex locators are equally accurate for determination of working length when compared to actual working length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6953924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69539242020-01-16 Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study Golvankar, Kapil Kader, Mohammed Abdul Latheef, Abhilash Abdul Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Abullais, Shahabe Saquib Sibagathullah, Mohammed Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science AIM: The present in-vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of root canal working length determination between the third generation and fourth generation electronic apex locators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted single-rooted single canal teeth were selected for the study, and a definite coronal plane was prepared. Actual working length (AL) was measured using a stereomicroscope under 8X magnification. Electronic working length measurements were recorded using Root ZX (EL1) and Elements Diagnostic Unit (EL2) apex locators. One-way ANOVA test was carried out to analyse the data among the experimental groups. RESULTS: The results of the one-way ANOVA test showed that difference in the working length determined by either apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. The independent ‘t’ test comparing between groups EL1 and AL; and EL2 and AL showed that working length determined by either of the apex locators (EL1 and EL2) and actual length determined under a stereomicroscope (AL) was statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, the Root ZX and Elements Diagnostic Unit apex locators are equally accurate for determination of working length when compared to actual working length. Republic of Macedonia 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6953924/ /pubmed/31949530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Kapil Golvankar, Mohammed Abdul Kader, Abhilash Abdul Latheef, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed Ali, Shahabe Saquib Abullais, Mohammed Sibagathullah. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
spellingShingle Dental Science
Golvankar, Kapil
Kader, Mohammed Abdul
Latheef, Abhilash Abdul
Ali, Ahamed Babiker Mohammed
Abullais, Shahabe Saquib
Sibagathullah, Mohammed
Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Accuracy in Determining the Root Canal Working Length by Using Two Generations of Apex Locators – An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of accuracy in determining the root canal working length by using two generations of apex locators – an in vitro study
topic Dental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.696
work_keys_str_mv AT golvankarkapil comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy
AT kadermohammedabdul comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy
AT latheefabhilashabdul comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy
AT aliahamedbabikermohammed comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy
AT abullaisshahabesaquib comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy
AT sibagathullahmohammed comparisonofaccuracyindeterminingtherootcanalworkinglengthbyusingtwogenerationsofapexlocatorsaninvitrostudy