Cargando…

Live Birth Rates in Poor Responders’ Group after Previous Treatment with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Compared with Poor Responders Used Only Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Before in Vitro Fertilization

BACKGROUND: This prospective pilot study determined the efficacy of previous transvaginal intraovarian injection with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in poor ovarian responders (PORs) fulfilling the Bologna criteria before in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Stojkovska, Snezhana, Dimitrov, Gligor, Stamenkovska, Nikoleta, Hadzi-Lega, Makuli, Petanovski, Zoran
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:	Clinical Science
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6953937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.825

Ejemplares similares

Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders
por: ÖZKAN, Zehra Sema
Publicado: (2019)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders
por: Yoo, Ji Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
por: Haahr, Thor, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Type and dose of gonadotropins in poor ovarian responders: does it matter?
por: Boudry, Liese, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Low Dose Growth Hormone Adjuvant Treatment With Ultra-Long Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responders Showed Non-inferior Pregnancy Outcome Compared With Normal Responders
por: Lee, Yi-Xuan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients
por: Selman, Helmy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?
por: Blumenfeld, Zeev
Publicado: (2020)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
por: Zhang, John
Publicado: (2015)

Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
por: Polat, Mehtap, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment modalities for poor ovarian responders
por: Di Guardo, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pregnancy Outcomes in Double Stimulation versus Two Consecutive Mild Stimulations for IVF in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Li, Jingzhe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
por: Bercaire, Ludmila, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders
por: Lebovitz, Oshrit, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
por: Liu, Ahui, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
por: Massin, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Individualized ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI treatment: it is time to stop using high FSH doses in predicted low responders
por: Leijdekkers, Jori A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
por: Llácer, Joaquín, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Original delayed-start ovarian stimulation protocol with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and high-dose gonadotropin for poor responders and patients with poor-quality embryos
por: Takeuchi, Kazuhiro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Perifollicular Vascularity in Poor Ovarian Responders in In vitro Fertilization Cycles
por: Majeed, Asifa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

LH supplementation of ovarian stimulation protocols influences follicular fluid steroid composition contributing to the improvement of ovarian response in poor responder women
por: Marchiani, S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy
por: Merviel, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of pregnancy outcome after letrozole versus clomiphene treatment for mild ovarian stimulation protocol in poor responders
por: Eftekhar, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

“Short agonist stop” protocol, an ovarian stimulation for poor responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A pilot study
por: Mauries, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Efficacies of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in poor ovarian responders classified by the POSEIDON criteria
por: Li, Fei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
por: Liu, Xiaoping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders
por: Luo, Yanqun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve
por: Lazer, Tal, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Pilehvari, Shamim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
por: Ebrahimi, Mahbod, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Datta, Adrija Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mild or Conventional GnRH-Antagonist Protocols for Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders (Poseidon Group 4)
por: Le, Hoang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Vural, Fisun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ovarian Reserve Markers to Identify Poor Responders in the Context of Poseidon Classification
por: Grisendi, Valentina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The impact of dehydroepiandrosterone in poor ovarian responders on assisted reproduction technology treatment
por: Monteiro, Cecilia de Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Nomogram to predict FSH starting dose in poor ovarian response women in progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocol
por: Wu, Shuxie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?
por: Shapira, Moran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
por: Moini, Ashraf, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comment on “The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders”
por: Orvieto, Raoul
Publicado: (2015)

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study
por: de Souza, Tatiane Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_3ug155lku556or6a7572tke1k8