Cargando…

Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review

PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dymarek, Robert, Ptaszkowski, Kuba, Ptaszkowska, Lucyna, Kowal, Mateusz, Sopel, Mirosław, Taradaj, Jakub, Rosińczuk, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021129
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032
_version_ 1783486734989787136
author Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Kowal, Mateusz
Sopel, Mirosław
Taradaj, Jakub
Rosińczuk, Joanna
author_facet Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Kowal, Mateusz
Sopel, Mirosław
Taradaj, Jakub
Rosińczuk, Joanna
author_sort Dymarek, Robert
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and EBSCOhost databases were systematically searched. Studies published between the years 2000 and 2019 in the impact factor journals and available in the English full-text version were eligible for inclusion. All qualified articles were classified in terms of their scientific reliability and methodological quality using the PEDro criteria. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and the registration on the PROSPERO database was done. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were reviewed of a total sample of 303 patients (age: 57.87±10.45 years and duration of stroke: 40.49±25.63 months) who were treated with ESWT. Recent data confirm both a subjective (spasticity, pain, and functioning) and objective (range of motion, postural control, muscular endurance, muscle tone, and muscle elasticity) improvements for post-stroke spasticity. The mean difference showing clinical improvement was: ∆=34.45% of grade for fESWT and ∆=34.97% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=0.52%) for spasticity (p<0.05), and ∆=38.83% of angular degrees for fESWT and ∆=32.26% for rESWT that determines the more beneficial effect of fESWT (∆=6.57%) for range of motion (p<0.05), and ∆=18.32% for fESWT and ∆=22.27% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=3.95%) for alpha motor neuron excitability (p<0.05). The mean PEDro score was 4.70±2.5 points for fESWT and 5.71±2.21 points for rESWT, thus an overall quality of evidence grade of moderate (“fair” for fESWT and “good” for rESWT). Three studies in fESWT and four in rESWT obtained Sackett’s grading system’s highest Level 1 of evidence. CONCLUSION: The studies affirm the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing muscle spasticity and improving motor recovery after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69540862020-02-04 Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Kowal, Mateusz Sopel, Mirosław Taradaj, Jakub Rosińczuk, Joanna Clin Interv Aging Review PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and EBSCOhost databases were systematically searched. Studies published between the years 2000 and 2019 in the impact factor journals and available in the English full-text version were eligible for inclusion. All qualified articles were classified in terms of their scientific reliability and methodological quality using the PEDro criteria. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and the registration on the PROSPERO database was done. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were reviewed of a total sample of 303 patients (age: 57.87±10.45 years and duration of stroke: 40.49±25.63 months) who were treated with ESWT. Recent data confirm both a subjective (spasticity, pain, and functioning) and objective (range of motion, postural control, muscular endurance, muscle tone, and muscle elasticity) improvements for post-stroke spasticity. The mean difference showing clinical improvement was: ∆=34.45% of grade for fESWT and ∆=34.97% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=0.52%) for spasticity (p<0.05), and ∆=38.83% of angular degrees for fESWT and ∆=32.26% for rESWT that determines the more beneficial effect of fESWT (∆=6.57%) for range of motion (p<0.05), and ∆=18.32% for fESWT and ∆=22.27% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=3.95%) for alpha motor neuron excitability (p<0.05). The mean PEDro score was 4.70±2.5 points for fESWT and 5.71±2.21 points for rESWT, thus an overall quality of evidence grade of moderate (“fair” for fESWT and “good” for rESWT). Three studies in fESWT and four in rESWT obtained Sackett’s grading system’s highest Level 1 of evidence. CONCLUSION: The studies affirm the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing muscle spasticity and improving motor recovery after stroke. Dove 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6954086/ /pubmed/32021129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032 Text en © 2020 Dymarek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Kowal, Mateusz
Sopel, Mirosław
Taradaj, Jakub
Rosińczuk, Joanna
Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title_full Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title_fullStr Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title_short Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
title_sort shock waves as a treatment modality for spasticity reduction and recovery improvement in post-stroke adults – current evidence and qualitative systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021129
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032
work_keys_str_mv AT dymarekrobert shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT ptaszkowskikuba shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT ptaszkowskalucyna shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT kowalmateusz shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT sopelmirosław shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT taradajjakub shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview
AT rosinczukjoanna shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview