Cargando…
Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review
PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032 |
_version_ | 1783486734989787136 |
---|---|
author | Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Kowal, Mateusz Sopel, Mirosław Taradaj, Jakub Rosińczuk, Joanna |
author_facet | Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Kowal, Mateusz Sopel, Mirosław Taradaj, Jakub Rosińczuk, Joanna |
author_sort | Dymarek, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and EBSCOhost databases were systematically searched. Studies published between the years 2000 and 2019 in the impact factor journals and available in the English full-text version were eligible for inclusion. All qualified articles were classified in terms of their scientific reliability and methodological quality using the PEDro criteria. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and the registration on the PROSPERO database was done. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were reviewed of a total sample of 303 patients (age: 57.87±10.45 years and duration of stroke: 40.49±25.63 months) who were treated with ESWT. Recent data confirm both a subjective (spasticity, pain, and functioning) and objective (range of motion, postural control, muscular endurance, muscle tone, and muscle elasticity) improvements for post-stroke spasticity. The mean difference showing clinical improvement was: ∆=34.45% of grade for fESWT and ∆=34.97% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=0.52%) for spasticity (p<0.05), and ∆=38.83% of angular degrees for fESWT and ∆=32.26% for rESWT that determines the more beneficial effect of fESWT (∆=6.57%) for range of motion (p<0.05), and ∆=18.32% for fESWT and ∆=22.27% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=3.95%) for alpha motor neuron excitability (p<0.05). The mean PEDro score was 4.70±2.5 points for fESWT and 5.71±2.21 points for rESWT, thus an overall quality of evidence grade of moderate (“fair” for fESWT and “good” for rESWT). Three studies in fESWT and four in rESWT obtained Sackett’s grading system’s highest Level 1 of evidence. CONCLUSION: The studies affirm the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing muscle spasticity and improving motor recovery after stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6954086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69540862020-02-04 Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Kowal, Mateusz Sopel, Mirosław Taradaj, Jakub Rosińczuk, Joanna Clin Interv Aging Review PURPOSE: This systematic review examines intervention studies using extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) application in post-stroke muscle spasticity with particular emphasis on the comparison of two different types of radial (rESWT) and focused shock waves (fESWT). METHODS: PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and EBSCOhost databases were systematically searched. Studies published between the years 2000 and 2019 in the impact factor journals and available in the English full-text version were eligible for inclusion. All qualified articles were classified in terms of their scientific reliability and methodological quality using the PEDro criteria. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and the registration on the PROSPERO database was done. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were reviewed of a total sample of 303 patients (age: 57.87±10.45 years and duration of stroke: 40.49±25.63 months) who were treated with ESWT. Recent data confirm both a subjective (spasticity, pain, and functioning) and objective (range of motion, postural control, muscular endurance, muscle tone, and muscle elasticity) improvements for post-stroke spasticity. The mean difference showing clinical improvement was: ∆=34.45% of grade for fESWT and ∆=34.97% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=0.52%) for spasticity (p<0.05), and ∆=38.83% of angular degrees for fESWT and ∆=32.26% for rESWT that determines the more beneficial effect of fESWT (∆=6.57%) for range of motion (p<0.05), and ∆=18.32% for fESWT and ∆=22.27% for rESWT that gives a slightly better effect of rESWT (∆=3.95%) for alpha motor neuron excitability (p<0.05). The mean PEDro score was 4.70±2.5 points for fESWT and 5.71±2.21 points for rESWT, thus an overall quality of evidence grade of moderate (“fair” for fESWT and “good” for rESWT). Three studies in fESWT and four in rESWT obtained Sackett’s grading system’s highest Level 1 of evidence. CONCLUSION: The studies affirm the effectiveness of ESWT in reducing muscle spasticity and improving motor recovery after stroke. Dove 2020-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6954086/ /pubmed/32021129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032 Text en © 2020 Dymarek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Kowal, Mateusz Sopel, Mirosław Taradaj, Jakub Rosińczuk, Joanna Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title_full | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title_short | Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review |
title_sort | shock waves as a treatment modality for spasticity reduction and recovery improvement in post-stroke adults – current evidence and qualitative systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S221032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dymarekrobert shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT ptaszkowskikuba shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT ptaszkowskalucyna shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT kowalmateusz shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT sopelmirosław shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT taradajjakub shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview AT rosinczukjoanna shockwavesasatreatmentmodalityforspasticityreductionandrecoveryimprovementinpoststrokeadultscurrentevidenceandqualitativesystematicreview |