Cargando…

Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities

BACKGROUND: Second-look ultrasonography (US) is commonly performed for breast lesions detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the identification rate of these lesions remains low. We investigated if US methods using anatomical breast structures can improve the lesion identification rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izumori, Ayumi, Kokubu, Yumi, Sato, Kazuko, Gomi, Naoya, Morizono, Hidetomo, Sakai, Takehiko, Horii, Rie, Akiyama, Futoshi, Iwase, Takuji, Ohno, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01003-z
_version_ 1783486747493007360
author Izumori, Ayumi
Kokubu, Yumi
Sato, Kazuko
Gomi, Naoya
Morizono, Hidetomo
Sakai, Takehiko
Horii, Rie
Akiyama, Futoshi
Iwase, Takuji
Ohno, Shinji
author_facet Izumori, Ayumi
Kokubu, Yumi
Sato, Kazuko
Gomi, Naoya
Morizono, Hidetomo
Sakai, Takehiko
Horii, Rie
Akiyama, Futoshi
Iwase, Takuji
Ohno, Shinji
author_sort Izumori, Ayumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Second-look ultrasonography (US) is commonly performed for breast lesions detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the identification rate of these lesions remains low. We investigated if US methods using anatomical breast structures can improve the lesion identification rate of MR-detected lesions and evaluated the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the second-look US using the above-mentioned method. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 235 breast lesions (hereinafter, “targets”) subjected to second-look US following MRI between January 2013 and September 2015. US was employed using the conventional methods, and this assessment measured the positional relationships of lesions with regard to surrounding anatomical breast structures (glandular pattern, Cooper’s ligaments, adipose morphology, and vascular routes). Associations were assessed among the following variables: the MRI findings, target size, identification rate, and main US indicators that led to identifying the target; FNAC results and MRI findings; MRI findings and histopathological findings; and FNAC results and histopathological findings. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC were determined. RESULTS: The identification rate was 99%. The main US indicators leading to identification were a glandular pattern (28–30% of lesions) and other breast structures (~ 25% of lesions). FNAC was performed for 232 targets with the following results: sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 91.6%, PPV of 94.1%, NPV of 92.9%, false-negative rate of 14.3%, false-positive rate of 2.1%, and accuracy of 89.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Second-look US using anatomical breast structures as indicators and US-guided FNAC are useful for refining the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions detected using MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69541422020-01-23 Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities Izumori, Ayumi Kokubu, Yumi Sato, Kazuko Gomi, Naoya Morizono, Hidetomo Sakai, Takehiko Horii, Rie Akiyama, Futoshi Iwase, Takuji Ohno, Shinji Breast Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Second-look ultrasonography (US) is commonly performed for breast lesions detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the identification rate of these lesions remains low. We investigated if US methods using anatomical breast structures can improve the lesion identification rate of MR-detected lesions and evaluated the diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the second-look US using the above-mentioned method. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 235 breast lesions (hereinafter, “targets”) subjected to second-look US following MRI between January 2013 and September 2015. US was employed using the conventional methods, and this assessment measured the positional relationships of lesions with regard to surrounding anatomical breast structures (glandular pattern, Cooper’s ligaments, adipose morphology, and vascular routes). Associations were assessed among the following variables: the MRI findings, target size, identification rate, and main US indicators that led to identifying the target; FNAC results and MRI findings; MRI findings and histopathological findings; and FNAC results and histopathological findings. Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC were determined. RESULTS: The identification rate was 99%. The main US indicators leading to identification were a glandular pattern (28–30% of lesions) and other breast structures (~ 25% of lesions). FNAC was performed for 232 targets with the following results: sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 91.6%, PPV of 94.1%, NPV of 92.9%, false-negative rate of 14.3%, false-positive rate of 2.1%, and accuracy of 89.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Second-look US using anatomical breast structures as indicators and US-guided FNAC are useful for refining the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions detected using MRI. Springer Japan 2019-08-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6954142/ /pubmed/31407151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01003-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Izumori, Ayumi
Kokubu, Yumi
Sato, Kazuko
Gomi, Naoya
Morizono, Hidetomo
Sakai, Takehiko
Horii, Rie
Akiyama, Futoshi
Iwase, Takuji
Ohno, Shinji
Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title_full Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title_fullStr Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title_short Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
title_sort usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-01003-z
work_keys_str_mv AT izumoriayumi usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT kokubuyumi usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT satokazuko usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT gominaoya usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT morizonohidetomo usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT sakaitakehiko usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT horiirie usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT akiyamafutoshi usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT iwasetakuji usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities
AT ohnoshinji usefulnessofsecondlookultrasonographyusinganatomicalbreaststructuresasindicatorsformagneticresonanceimagingdetectedbreastabnormalities