Cargando…

Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same

BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption, even at low-levels, can not be guaranteed as safe or risk free. Specifically, the 2009 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council drinking guidelines recommend that adults should not drink more than two standard drinks on any day on average, and no more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mugavin, Janette, MacLean, Sarah, Room, Robin, Callinan, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8147-5
_version_ 1783486807306928128
author Mugavin, Janette
MacLean, Sarah
Room, Robin
Callinan, Sarah
author_facet Mugavin, Janette
MacLean, Sarah
Room, Robin
Callinan, Sarah
author_sort Mugavin, Janette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption, even at low-levels, can not be guaranteed as safe or risk free. Specifically, the 2009 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council drinking guidelines recommend that adults should not drink more than two standard drinks on any day on average, and no more than four drinks on a single occasion. Nearly 40% of Australians aged 12 years and older drink alcohol but don’t exceed these recommended limits, yet adult low-risk drinkers have been largely overlooked in Australian alcohol survey research, where they are usually grouped with abstainers. This paper examines the socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinking adults (18+ years old), compared to those who abstain. METHODS: Data from the 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey were used. In the past 12 months, 4796 Australians had not consumed alcohol and 8734 had consumed alcohol at low-risk levels, accounting for both average volume and episodic drinking (hereafter low-risk). RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that low-risk drinkers were more likely to be older, married, Australian-born, and reside in a less disadvantaged neighbourhood compared with abstainers. There was no significant difference by sex between low-risk drinkers and abstainers. CONCLUSIONS: The socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinkers differed from that of abstainers. Combining low-risk drinkers and abstainers into a single group, which is often the practice in survey research, may mask important differences. The study may support improved targeting of health promotion initiatives that encourage low-risk drinkers not to increase consumption or, in view of increasing evidence that low-risk drinking is not risk free, to move towards abstinence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69545072020-01-14 Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same Mugavin, Janette MacLean, Sarah Room, Robin Callinan, Sarah BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Alcohol consumption, even at low-levels, can not be guaranteed as safe or risk free. Specifically, the 2009 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council drinking guidelines recommend that adults should not drink more than two standard drinks on any day on average, and no more than four drinks on a single occasion. Nearly 40% of Australians aged 12 years and older drink alcohol but don’t exceed these recommended limits, yet adult low-risk drinkers have been largely overlooked in Australian alcohol survey research, where they are usually grouped with abstainers. This paper examines the socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinking adults (18+ years old), compared to those who abstain. METHODS: Data from the 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey were used. In the past 12 months, 4796 Australians had not consumed alcohol and 8734 had consumed alcohol at low-risk levels, accounting for both average volume and episodic drinking (hereafter low-risk). RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression results indicated that low-risk drinkers were more likely to be older, married, Australian-born, and reside in a less disadvantaged neighbourhood compared with abstainers. There was no significant difference by sex between low-risk drinkers and abstainers. CONCLUSIONS: The socio-demographic profile of low-risk drinkers differed from that of abstainers. Combining low-risk drinkers and abstainers into a single group, which is often the practice in survey research, may mask important differences. The study may support improved targeting of health promotion initiatives that encourage low-risk drinkers not to increase consumption or, in view of increasing evidence that low-risk drinking is not risk free, to move towards abstinence. BioMed Central 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6954507/ /pubmed/31924194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8147-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mugavin, Janette
MacLean, Sarah
Room, Robin
Callinan, Sarah
Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title_full Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title_fullStr Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title_full_unstemmed Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title_short Adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
title_sort adult low-risk drinkers and abstainers are not the same
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8147-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mugavinjanette adultlowriskdrinkersandabstainersarenotthesame
AT macleansarah adultlowriskdrinkersandabstainersarenotthesame
AT roomrobin adultlowriskdrinkersandabstainersarenotthesame
AT callinansarah adultlowriskdrinkersandabstainersarenotthesame