Cargando…
Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y |
_version_ | 1783486824494137344 |
---|---|
author | Potemin, Sergey Kübler, Jens Uvarov, Ivan Wenz, Frederik Giordano, Frank |
author_facet | Potemin, Sergey Kübler, Jens Uvarov, Ivan Wenz, Frederik Giordano, Frank |
author_sort | Potemin, Sergey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar). During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities. Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy. Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 92 (53.5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.4 Gy [40–50.4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]). The median age was 65 years [33–82]. The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months]. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.4%. Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.4% in the IORT group and 65.4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.66, p = 0.51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6954580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69545802020-01-14 Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy Potemin, Sergey Kübler, Jens Uvarov, Ivan Wenz, Frederik Giordano, Frank Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar). During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities. Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy. Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 92 (53.5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.4 Gy [40–50.4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]). The median age was 65 years [33–82]. The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months]. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.4%. Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.4% in the IORT group and 65.4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.66, p = 0.51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT. BioMed Central 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6954580/ /pubmed/31924250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Potemin, Sergey Kübler, Jens Uvarov, Ivan Wenz, Frederik Giordano, Frank Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title | Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title_full | Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title_short | Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
title_sort | intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poteminsergey intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy AT kublerjens intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy AT uvarovivan intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy AT wenzfrederik intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy AT giordanofrank intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy |