Cargando…

Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potemin, Sergey, Kübler, Jens, Uvarov, Ivan, Wenz, Frederik, Giordano, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y
_version_ 1783486824494137344
author Potemin, Sergey
Kübler, Jens
Uvarov, Ivan
Wenz, Frederik
Giordano, Frank
author_facet Potemin, Sergey
Kübler, Jens
Uvarov, Ivan
Wenz, Frederik
Giordano, Frank
author_sort Potemin, Sergey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar). During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities. Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy. Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 92 (53.5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.4 Gy [40–50.4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]). The median age was 65 years [33–82]. The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months]. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.4%. Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.4% in the IORT group and 65.4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.66, p = 0.51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69545802020-01-14 Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy Potemin, Sergey Kübler, Jens Uvarov, Ivan Wenz, Frederik Giordano, Frank Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concomitant chemotherapy is the current standard-of-care for locally-advanced rectal cancer. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is to date only recommended for pelvic recurrences or incompletely resectable tumors. We here report on patients with stage II/III rectal cancer that were treated with IORT in a regional Russian university center due to limited access to EBRT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that were diagnosed with locally-advanced rectal cancer and underwent surgery from December 2012 to October 2016 at a regional oncological center in Russia (Krasnodar). During this period, access to EBRT was limited due to a temporary lack of a sufficient number of EBRT facilities. Patients unable to travel to a distant radiotherapy site received IORT alone, those that could travel received neoadjuvant external beam (chemo-) radiotherapy. Factors of interest were tumor stage, tumor differentiation, resection status, surgery type and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed local progression-free survival (L-PFS), PFS and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 92 (53.5%) were treated with IORT alone (median dose: 15 Gy [8.4–17 Gy]) and 80 (46.5%) received both neoadjuvant EBRT (median dose: 50.4 Gy [40–50.4 Gy]) and IORT (median dose: 15 Gy [15–17 Gy]). The median age was 65 years [33–82]. The median follow-up was 23 months [0–63 months]. The incidence of toxicity was low in both groups with an overall complication rate of 5.4%. Local PFS at 4 years was comparable with 59.4% in the IORT group and 65.4% in the IORT/EBRT group (p = 0.70). Similarly, there was no difference in OS or PFS (p = 0.66, p = 0.51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IORT is a valuable option for patients with locally-advanced rectal cancer in the absence of access to EBRT. BioMed Central 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6954580/ /pubmed/31924250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Potemin, Sergey
Kübler, Jens
Uvarov, Ivan
Wenz, Frederik
Giordano, Frank
Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title_full Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title_fullStr Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title_short Intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
title_sort intraoperative radiotherapy as an immediate adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer due to limited access to external-beam radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-1458-y
work_keys_str_mv AT poteminsergey intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT kublerjens intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT uvarovivan intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT wenzfrederik intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT giordanofrank intraoperativeradiotherapyasanimmediateadjuvanttreatmentofrectalcancerduetolimitedaccesstoexternalbeamradiotherapy